Politics of Petulance (title renamed to match original post)

[Dashinka 24,638]

On 2/29/2024 at 12:48 AM, Family said:

The ‘partners’ are declared racists and anti immigrant , CIS , for example, is a designated HATE GROUP . …won’t surprise anyone that it’s folks held administration positions in the last round, heh…

The CIS was founded by Otis L. Graham and John Tanton. The organization was founded in 1985 as a spin-off from the Federation for American Immigration Reform and is one of a number of anti-immigration organizations 

Opposition to work permits for foreign university students

CIS seeks an end to "Optional Practical Training" work permits, which foreign students who attend American universities can use to obtain internships.^[41]

 

Tanton is a retired Michigan ophthalmologist who opposed immigration on racial grounds, desired a white ethnic majority in the United States and advocated for eugenics.^[46][12][47] The SPLC's 2009 report charged that "FAIR, CIS and NumbersUSA are all part of a network of restrictionist organizations conceived and created by John Tanton" who they said had "deeply racist" views, and said that the group had "frequently manipulated data" in order to promote anti-immigration goals.^[45]

 

https://www.heritage.org/press/project-2025-reaches-100-coalition-partners-continues-grow-preparation-next-president?preview_id=2848&preview_nonce=e270c3a857&preview=true&_thumbnail_id=2853

Project 2025 Reaches 100 Coalition Partners, Continues to Grow in Preparation for Next President

Is anything coming out of the SPLC credible today?

[Family 4,065]

 

[Family 4,065]

A cognitive test to be president? Sure. Try this one.

 

Over the past several weeks, it has been proposed that the leading candidates for president of the United States be administered cognitive tests to determine their mental acuity. This, generally, is worrying. Under the circumstances, however, it is a good idea. I suggest that each candidate answer the following:

1. What year is it?
2. What country do you live in?

3. Is that country a democracy or a dictatorship?

4. Let’s get that in writing, please.

5. Put the following words in the correct order: respecting an establishment of religion Congress shall make no law.

6. Draw a person.

7. Draw a fertilized egg.

8. Are the two different?

9. Draw a clock.

10. How many minutes from midnight is this clock?

11. Is it good or bad that it is that close to midnight?

12. Who is the president now?
13. Who won the last presidential election?

14. Should these answers be the same?

15. “If Pennsylvania does not pick the winner for president, they are going to change the name of the state.” Does this statement make sense?

16. Here is a picture of Vladimir Putin. Can you see any friends in this picture?

17. If two people were engaged in a contest to win the most of something, and Joe won 306 but Don won only 232, who would have won that contest: Joe or Don?

18. Which of the following is a good place to store classified documents: (a) garage (b) bathroom (c) library (d) none of the above?

19. Here is a picture of the Supreme Court. Circle the people on it who owe you, personally, favors, if the system is functioning as it should.

20. How many terms does the president get to serve?

21. If the blue house is made of bricks, the red house is made of bricks, and the orange house is made of bricks, what should the White House be doing to prevent civilian deaths? 22. Should the president’s children get jobs in the administration?

23. What year is it again?

24. Is this a year when we have a king?

25. Make a perfect phone call.

26. Bend over and pick a classified document up from the floor. Bend over and pick up another classified document. Keep picking them up until you have gathered them all.

27. Where is Kate Middleton? Oh, just figured I’d ask. 28. Do you know how much money you are worth?

29. What number world war comes next?

30. The 14th Amendment! Good or bad?

31. As best as you can recollect, what form of government is the United States?

32. Does the United States have a dictator?

33. What about just for Day 1 of an administration? [If yes, ask questions

33a through

33e. If no, proceed to Question

34.] 33a. Really? Are you serious?

33b. What do you mean “stop asking questions”? 33c. Or else what?

33d. *palely* Yes, understood, would you like to proceed directly to Question

34? 33e. What can an informed citizenry facing two candidates who are both flawed but not at all equivalently dangerous do to stop this?

34. Draw another clock.

 

—-😴Am unable to post link. Apologies. Article is from Washington Post

Edited March 2 by Family

[Dashinka 24,638]

How many would Old Corrupt Petulant Joe get right?

[Crazy Cat 41,985]

29 minutes ago, Dashinka said:

How many would Old Corrupt Petulant Joe get right?

It amazes me that anyone who can see even questions the need for Joe to be evaluated......but then, it's obvious that no medical training is needed to know he is severely impaired.  

[TBoneTX 45,603]

12 hours ago, Crazy Cat said:

no medical training is needed to know he is severely impaired

My thought is assisted living with memory care.

[Ban Hammer 13,434]

15 hours ago, Crazy Cat said:

It amazes me that anyone who can see even questions the need for Joe to be evaluated......but then, it's obvious that no medical training is needed to know he is severely impaired.  

i'm still wondering what happened to all of the armchair doctors that were busy diagnosing trump went to as we have a real need for their expertise.

[Dashinka 24,638]

On 3/3/2024 at 2:12 AM, Ban Hammer said:

i'm still wondering what happened to all of the armchair doctors that were busy diagnosing trump went to as we have a real need for their expertise.

They are still diagnosing Trump as the WH/Democrats/DC Establishment are really pushing a narrative showing Trump in decline all while trying to tell us to not believe our eyes and ears when we see Biden speak or attempt to walk.

[Family 4,065]

[Dashinka 24,638]

Hmm, Leftist/Democrats seem to be very petulant.  Of course the main difference being that these petulant Leftist/Democrats actually think they have some influence.  Bless their hearts.

 

Keith Olbermann Calls for Dissolution of SCOTUS: 'Political Whores on the Court' Overruled the Constitution for Trump

 

 

Olbermann kicked things off when he tweeted, "The Supreme Court has betrayed democracy. Its members including Jackson, Kagan and Sotomayor have proved themselves inept at reading comprehension. And collectively the "court" has shown itself to be corrupt and illegitimate. It must be dissolved."

 

With such a fiery take, it's no surprise that Olbermann was soon peppered with questions from plenty of people on Twitter/X. Josie Globach, who runs the account for The Redheaded Libertarian, asked, "Dissolve the separation of powers to save democracy?"

 

Olbermann fired back, "If the political whores on the court are overruling quite explicit language in the constitution to benefit one politician, your 'separation of powers' died long ago."

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/keith-olbermann-calls-for-dissolution-of-scotus-political-whores-on-the-court-overruled-the-constitution-for-trump/ar-BB1jkZGI

 

[Family 4,065]

 

[Dashinka 24,638]

More Leftist media types being unhinged and completely petulant.

 

https://www.mrctv.org/videos/mrcs-brent-bozell-joins-fbns-varney-mocking-media-reaction-scotus-trump-ballot-decision

 

 

[TBoneTX 45,603]

11 hours ago, Dashinka said:

Hmm, Leftist/Democrats seem to be very petulant.

All their news sites call it a "5 to 4" SCOTUS decision.   

[Family 4,065]

History will remember SCOTUS calling Trump an 'oathbreaking insurrectionist'

 

[Family 4,065]

8 minutes ago, Family said:

History will remember SCOTUS calling Trump an 'oathbreaking insurrectionist'

 

Oath breaking insurrectionist  indeed

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-719_19m2.pdf