Politics of Petulance (title renamed to match original post)

[Family 3,988]

Oh ooh…

 

Lauren Boebert's Ex-Husband Breaks Silence on 'Cruel' Restraining Order

 

Jayson Boebert, the ex-husband of Representative Lauren Boebert, broke his silence on a restraining order obtained by the congresswoman after he was charged in connection to two domestic altercations last month.

Lauren Boebert obtained a temporary restraining order against her ex-husband last Friday. In her request for the order, Boebert made several allegations against him, including name-calling, making harassing phone calls and "abusing children in the household.

 

Newsweek reviewed the order, which applies to the Colorado Republican congresswoman and three of their children.

Jayson Boebert responded to the report in an interview with Westword, a Denver, Colorado-based news magazine. He alleged that he was never served with the order and only learned of it when an Associated Press reporter contacted him for a statement. He described the order as "cruel and unfair."

 

It is a prison sentence to keep me from my family," he said.

 

https://www.newsweek.com/lauren-boebert-ex-husband-breaks-silence-restraining-order-1867924

[TBoneTX 45,248]

40 minutes ago, Family said:

Lauren Boebert

She's toast in the upcoming election.

[Family 3,988]

Belly laugh 😂 on page 58  of Jack Smith latest brief 

Trump plus 2 , attorney claims he does not own laptop or desk top computer and is unable to view security cctv footage on his small

tablet . ..so Jack’s Team

hand delivers him a laptop
 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited February 8 by Family

[Family 3,988]

33 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

She's toast in the upcoming election.

I am baffled at how the media knew about the TRO before the ex husband was even served ….

Is Lauren pulling an Amber /TMZ  …if so it backfired badly . 

[TBoneTX 45,248]

1 hour ago, Family said:

I am baffled at how the media knew about the TRO before the ex husband was even served

I dunno, either.

[Dashinka 24,479]

12 hours ago, Family said:

Belly laugh 😂 on page 58  of Jack Smith latest brief 

Trump plus 2 , attorney claims he does not own laptop or desk top computer and is unable to view security cctv footage on his small

tablet . ..so Jack’s Team

hand delivers him a laptop
 

 

 

 

 

 

Always love Larry O. as it brings up nice memories.

 

 

[Family 3,988]

Listen 

 

 

[Family 3,988]

1 hour ago, Family said:

Listen 

 

 

A user friendly link to the 2 hour  oral

arguments before Supreme Court . Includes playback   text and filtered searches 

 

 

https://www.c-span.org/video/?532724-1/supreme-ct-hears-case-fmr-pres-trumps-colorado-ballot-eligibility

[Family 3,988]

Union workers just don’t understand show biz 😂 ..campaign location scouts may have made a Rudy Giuliani Four Seasons boo-boo
 

 

https://miaflcio.org/statement-trumps-support-for-workers-a-fake-enterprise/STATEMENT: TRUMP’S “SUPPORT” FOR WORKERS A FAKE ENTERPRISE

 

CLINTON TWP., Mich. – The Trump re-election campaign paid $20,000 to stage a rally at Drake Enterprises, a non-union parts supplier facility in Michigan, back in September. The rally was seemingly an attempt to curry favor with striking union auto workers after President Biden made history the day before as the first President to walk a picket line. Reporters at the Trump event struggled to find any evidence of auto workers in attendance. In reaction, Michigan AFL-CIO Communications Director Aaron PELO released the following statement:

“Having to pay twenty grand to rent a non-union facility because nobody wanted to host your event is literally so embarrassing. Trump’s whole bit is that he supports blue-collar Americans and wants to protect auto jobs but he couldn’t even find a real auto worker to hold up a rally sign. Scabbing has truly never looked so desperate.”

 

[Family 3,988]

2 hours ago, Family said:

A user friendly link to the 2 hour  oral

arguments before Supreme Court . Includes playback   text and filtered searches 

 

 

https://www.c-span.org/video/?532724-1/supreme-ct-hears-case-fmr-pres-trumps-colorado-ballot-eligibility

Meet the lawyers arguing the Trump ballot case at the Supreme Court
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/02/07/trump-supreme-court-lawyers-00139974

[Dashinka 24,479]

3 hours ago, Family said:

Union workers just don’t understand show biz 😂 ..campaign location scouts may have made a Rudy Giuliani Four Seasons boo-boo
 

 

https://miaflcio.org/statement-trumps-support-for-workers-a-fake-enterprise/STATEMENT: TRUMP’S “SUPPORT” FOR WORKERS A FAKE ENTERPRISE

 

CLINTON TWP., Mich. – The Trump re-election campaign paid $20,000 to stage a rally at Drake Enterprises, a non-union parts supplier facility in Michigan, back in September. The rally was seemingly an attempt to curry favor with striking union auto workers after President Biden made history the day before as the first President to walk a picket line. Reporters at the Trump event struggled to find any evidence of auto workers in attendance. In reaction, Michigan AFL-CIO Communications Director Aaron PELO released the following statement:

“Having to pay twenty grand to rent a non-union facility because nobody wanted to host your event is literally so embarrassing. Trump’s whole bit is that he supports blue-collar Americans and wants to protect auto jobs but he couldn’t even find a real auto worker to hold up a rally sign. Scabbing has truly never looked so desperate.”

 

Did Old Corrupt Senile Petulant Joe even know he was in Michigan?  Did he talk to any dead people?  I imagine since it was a union event, maybe he channeled Jimmy Hoffa.

[TBoneTX 45,248]

4 hours ago, Family said:

the Trump ballot case

At worst 7-2, at best 9-0.

[Family 3,988]

2 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

At worst 7-2, at best 9-0.

You are right . All Justices seemed to focus on ramifications of one state setting a precedent. Colorado will lose. 

[Pooky 3,780]

40 minutes ago, Family said:

You are right . All Justices seemed to focus on ramifications of one state setting a precedent. Colorado will lose. 

Rather they were focused on the damage to democracy for preventing the electorate having their say in an election.

 

ironic that, for all their bleating about a DJT presidency destroying democracy, his opponents are the ones trying to circumvent the democratic process. 😒

[Family 3,988]

1 hour ago, Pooky said:

Rather they were focused on the damage to democracy for preventing the electorate having their say in an election.

 

ironic that, for all their bleating about a DJT presidency destroying democracy, his opponents are the ones trying to circumvent the democratic process. 😒

I got the sense Justices swayed from the WHY we got there  ( insurrection ) to some lacking process .of sorts . that needs to go through Federal channels .

 

Hats off to Mitchell

. 

Fighting it out in court  ( rven

on Senste floor ) with a May The Best Man Win ..our Democracy is safe and sound .