Jump to content
TBoneTX

[Master Thread] Federal & State Charges Against Pres. Trump [merged]

 Share

1,127 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts


Judge won't let Trump delay E. Jean Carroll penalties, leaving him with days to cover $83M judgment

 

A New York judge on Thursday denied Donald Trump's request for a temporary delay of the penalties in E. Jean Carroll's defamation case, leaving the former president three days to pay or post a bond for the entire $83.3 million judgment.

Judge Lewis Kaplan signaled he is still considering Trump's request for a reduced bond or a delay until the resolution of his post-trial motions.

"Mr. Trump's current situation is a result of his own dilatory actions," Kaplan wrote in his order late Thursday. "He has had since January 26 to organize his finances with the knowledge that he might need to bond this judgment, yet he waited until 25 days after the jury verdict ... to file his prior motion for an unsecured or partially secured stay pending resolution of post-trial motions."

 

https://abcnews.go.com/US/judge-trump-delay-jean-carroll-penalties-leaving-days/story?id=107885701

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

Letitia James Issues $355 Million Fine To Firefighters For Booing Her

 

[...] "Last week, I was cruelly assaulted and insurrected by racist Trump supporters," said the Attorney General in a statement.  "Our democracy is no place for firefighters to express their displeasure with the weaponization of the justice system against their preferred candidate.  I will not rest until [...]

 

https://babylonbee.com/news/letitia-james-issues-355-million-dollar-fine-to-firefighters-for-booing-her

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

Judge throws out 6 counts of Trump's Georgia election interference indictment

 

A Fulton County judge on Wednesday quashed multiple counts contained in the election interference indictment against former President Donald Trump and several of his co-defendants.  [...]

 

https://www.yahoo.com/gma/judge-throws-6-counts-trumps-142438419.html

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Taiwan
Timeline
On 3/13/2024 at 10:56 AM, TBoneTX said:

Judge throws out 6 counts of Trump's Georgia election interference indictment

 

A Fulton County judge on Wednesday quashed multiple counts contained in the election interference indictment against former President Donald Trump and several of his co-defendants.  [...]

 

https://www.yahoo.com/gma/judge-throws-6-counts-trumps-142438419.html

My conclusions:

1.  Biden's condition is worse than we thought.

2.  Raskin, Nadler, and the other democrat questioners are clowns who insult our intelligence.

3.  Biden spread classified documents across 3 states for 40 years.

I handled classified documents for about 20 years (including time as a Titan II ICBM launch crew member in the 70s & 80s, and as a missile systems maintenance superintendent dealing with very sensitive (black project) weapon systems.  I generated classified documents at times).   I would be in Leavenworth prison right now had I taken any of those documents out of assigned areas for any reason....even the one I created.  

Edited by Crazy Cat

"The US immigration process requires a great deal of knowledge, planning, time, patience, and a significant amount of money.  It is quite a journey!"

- Some old child of the 50's & 60's on his laptop 

 

Senior Master Sergeant, US Air Force- Retired (after 20+ years)- Missile Systems Maintenance & Titan 2 ICBM Launch Crew Duty (200+ Alert tours)

Registered Nurse- Retired- I practiced in the areas of Labor & Delivery, Home Health, Adolescent Psych, & Adult Psych.

IT Professional- Retired- Web Site Design, Hardware Maintenance, Compound Pharmacy Software Trainer, On-site go live support, Database Manager, App Designer.

______________________________________

In summary, it took 13 months for approval of the CR-1.  It took 44 months for approval of the I-751.  It took 4 months for approval of the N-400.   It took 172 days from N-400 application to Oath Ceremony.   It took 6 weeks for Passport, then 7 additional weeks for return of wife's Naturalization Certificate.. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

Judge throws out 6 counts of Trump's Georgia election interference indictment

 

A Fulton County judge on Wednesday quashed multiple counts contained in the election interference indictment against former President Donald Trump and several of his co-defendants.  [...]

 

https://www.yahoo.com/gma/judge-throws-6-counts-trumps-142438419.html

88 more to go 😂

Edited by Family
91 less 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Taiwan
Timeline

and the count will continue to dwindle........book it.

"The US immigration process requires a great deal of knowledge, planning, time, patience, and a significant amount of money.  It is quite a journey!"

- Some old child of the 50's & 60's on his laptop 

 

Senior Master Sergeant, US Air Force- Retired (after 20+ years)- Missile Systems Maintenance & Titan 2 ICBM Launch Crew Duty (200+ Alert tours)

Registered Nurse- Retired- I practiced in the areas of Labor & Delivery, Home Health, Adolescent Psych, & Adult Psych.

IT Professional- Retired- Web Site Design, Hardware Maintenance, Compound Pharmacy Software Trainer, On-site go live support, Database Manager, App Designer.

______________________________________

In summary, it took 13 months for approval of the CR-1.  It took 44 months for approval of the I-751.  It took 4 months for approval of the N-400.   It took 172 days from N-400 application to Oath Ceremony.   It took 6 weeks for Passport, then 7 additional weeks for return of wife's Naturalization Certificate.. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
21 hours ago, Family said:

88 more to go 😂

The Democrat/Left/Petulant "Progressives" always over estimate themselves.

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

If the November election isn't fixed again, I agree with this author that there may be backlash.  Comments?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The High Price of Democrats' Anti-Trump Lawfare

 

The newest buzzword in our politics is lawfare, or using the legal system as a weapon against a political opponent.  It sits before us now as a spectacle of political gluttony.  How many lawsuits, court motions and judgments against Donald Trump can the Democratic Party chow down?  More disturbing is the high price the American system may pay for this excess.  [...]

 

https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-high-price-of-anti-trump-lawfare-eroding-public-trust-politicized-prosecutions-7bba71d8?mod=opinion_lead_pos9

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: England
Timeline
45 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

If the November election isn't fixed again, I agree with this author that there may be backlash.  Comments?

I doubt A President DJT or his administration would engage in lawfare. I suspect there will be other targets he will be busy dealing with.

 

But I would bet a large amount of money that the Democrats will escalate their lawfare to try to obstruct a DJT presidency, even more so than in his first administration.

Don't interrupt me when I'm talking to myself

2011-11-15.garfield.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

If the November election isn't fixed again, I agree with this author that there may be backlash.  Comments?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The High Price of Democrats' Anti-Trump Lawfare

 

The newest buzzword in our politics is lawfare, or using the legal system as a weapon against a political opponent.  It sits before us now as a spectacle of political gluttony.  How many lawsuits, court motions and judgments against Donald Trump can the Democratic Party chow down?  More disturbing is the high price the American system may pay for this excess.  [...]

 

https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-high-price-of-anti-trump-lawfare-eroding-public-trust-politicized-prosecutions-7bba71d8?mod=opinion_lead_pos9

So far each of the 4 cases  on the menu are stalled. …as a result of Defendant legal play. 
Considering three civil cases against him filed by Jan 6 victims have just been green lighted…I still believe if/when Dominion decides to go after him , it will sting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
1 minute ago, Family said:

So far each of the 4 cases  on the menu are stalled. …as a result of Defendant legal play. 
Considering three civil cases against him filed by Jan 6 victims have just been green lighted…I still believe if/when Dominion decides to go after him , it will sting

You do understand that it is the defendant that retains the right to a speedy trial, not the state right?

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Dashinka said:

You do understand that it is the defendant that retains the right to a speedy trial, not the state right?



Does the public have a right to a speedy trial in the Trump case? 
 

The U. S. Constitution and the constitution of most states (except California, Article I, Section 29), however, only grant “the accused” — not “the prosecution” — a speedy trial right. Does that end the discussion? Meaning, can a defendant in the courtroom of a sympathetic judge simply accomplish having his case delayed in futuronotwithstanding the demands of a vigilant prosecutor? Or is there somehow an inchoate right to a speedy trial possessed by the prosecutor and the public too

 

The federal Speedy Trial Act, Title 18 U. S. Code, Section 3161, provides that the appropriate judicial officer shall promptly set any case for trial on a date certain “so as to assure a speedy trial” — not simply a speedy trial for the defendant. And Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure states that the purpose of the federal rules is “to eliminate unjustifiable expense and delay” — not just an “unjustifiable delay” by the court or prosecutor
 

https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/4498459-does-the-public-have-a-right-to-a-speedy-trial-in-the-trump-case/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
1 hour ago, Family said:



Does the public have a right to a speedy trial in the Trump case? 
 

The U. S. Constitution and the constitution of most states (except California, Article I, Section 29), however, only grant “the accused” — not “the prosecution” — a speedy trial right. Does that end the discussion? Meaning, can a defendant in the courtroom of a sympathetic judge simply accomplish having his case delayed in futuronotwithstanding the demands of a vigilant prosecutor? Or is there somehow an inchoate right to a speedy trial possessed by the prosecutor and the public too

 

The federal Speedy Trial Act, Title 18 U. S. Code, Section 3161, provides that the appropriate judicial officer shall promptly set any case for trial on a date certain “so as to assure a speedy trial” — not simply a speedy trial for the defendant. And Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure states that the purpose of the federal rules is “to eliminate unjustifiable expense and delay” — not just an “unjustifiable delay” by the court or prosecutor
 

https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/4498459-does-the-public-have-a-right-to-a-speedy-trial-in-the-trump-case/

 

So are you suggesting the motions being filed are unreasonable?  

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/12/2024 at 3:18 AM, TBoneTX said:

Letitia James Issues $355 Million Fine To Firefighters For Booing Her

 

[...] "Last week, I was cruelly assaulted and insurrected by racist Trump supporters," said the Attorney General in a statement.  "Our democracy is no place for firefighters to express their displeasure with the weaponization of the justice system against their preferred candidate.  I will not rest until [...]

 

https://babylonbee.com/news/letitia-james-issues-355-million-dollar-fine-to-firefighters-for-booing-her

insurrected she said lol. The nuts are running the nut house

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...