Jump to content
TBoneTX

[Master Thread] Federal & State Charges Against Pres. Trump [merged]

 Share

1,127 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts


Rift among the RICO 19 . as Trump racks up millions of $ from MAGA and others left to struggle on their own with massive legal defense costs. 

Trump lawyer and co-defendant Jenna Ellis says she won't support him due to his 'malignant narcissistic' tendencies

 

I simply can't support him for elected office again," Ellis said on her showon American Family Radio, a right-wing Christian network. "Why I have chosen to distance is because of that frankly malignant narcissistic tendency to simply say that he's never done anything wrong."

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-lawyer-co-defendant-jenna-151858094.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

Jonathan Turley.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Jack Smith goes too far in trying to gag Donald Trump

 

[...] "a narrowly tailored order that imposes modest, permissible restrictions."

 

Those words were used by Special Counsel Jack Smith to propose a gag order that would sharply curtail the ability of former President Donald Trump to criticize Smith and his prosecution.


The Smith motion is anything but "narrowly tailored."


Indeed, short of a mobile "Get Smart" Cone of Silence, it is chilling to think of what Smith considered the broader option.  [...]

 

https://nypost.com/2023/09/16/jack-smith-goes-too-far-in-trying-to-gag-donald-trump/

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Trump reportedly told aide, ‘You don’t know anything about the boxes’

 

It’s almost as if Trump was concerned about his assistant telling law enforcement the truth, so he took the legally dubious step of subtly encouraging her to play dumb.

 

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trump-reportedly-told-aide-dont-know-anything-boxes-rcna105761

 

 

As described to ABC News, the aide, Molly Michael, told investigators that -- more than once -- she received requests or taskings from Trump that were written on the back of notecards, and she later recognized those notecards as sensitive White House materials -- with visible classification markings -- used to brief Trump while he was still in office about phone calls with foreign leaders or other international-related matters.

 

https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-wrote-lists-assistant-white-house-documents-marked/story?id=103226113

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline

Why should there be secrets in grand jury proceedings?  Should the state be able to hide the dealings of their prosecutors?

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Attorneys for Kenneth Chesebro, a pro-Trump lawyer, argued the search warrant used to obtain emails from his MSN email account ahead of his indictment “is defective” and the search and seizure of the emails was “illegal.”

 

In their Fulton County Superior Court filing, Chesebro’s attorneys said Georgia rules only allow the use of search warrants where there is probable cause to believe that the evidence sought would otherwise be deleted.

But there was “no such concern” in this case, they argued, because months earlier Microsoft had archived all the e-mails in Fulton County Superior Court.”

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Judge to hear arguments over scope of trial in New York's civil suit against Trump

The former president's lawyers want the state Supreme Court to dismiss the fraud lawsuit against the Trump family brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James.
 

During the pretrial hearing, New York Supreme Court Judge Arthur Engoron will review a motion for a summary judgment by Trump's lawyers that was filed in late August, asking for the attorney general's complaint to be dismissed.

 

Trump's lawyers argued that the New York attorney general has "no valid authority" to sue, that the lawsuit was filed outside the statute of limitations and that James has “failed to demonstrate any even theoretical harm to anyone, public or private.”

James' office has asked the court to find the Trumps and their family business, the Trump Organization, liable for fraud even before the trial is set to begin Oct. 2. "The undisputed evidence establishes that Defendants employed a variety of deceptive schemes to grossly inflated values for many of Mr. Trump’s assets," her office wrote in a filing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
37 minutes ago, Family said:

Grand jury proceedings are by definition secret ..

Why should it be?  Do you know that only the US and Liberia use grand juries?  And in the US they are not used in every jurisdiction.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_jury

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Dashinka said:

Why should it be?  Do you know that only the US and Liberia use grand juries?  And in the US they are not used in every jurisdiction.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_jury

We have made it our own. Breaking secrecy is giving undue deference to this particular defendant..who incites his followers to threaten, harass and harm anyone/everyone from judge to witnesses.

 

After the Revolutionary War ended, the new federal constitution did not include a grand jury. Early American leaders such as John Hancock and James Madison objected. Thereafter, the grand jury was included in the Bill of Rights, as part of the Fifth Amendment, which states, "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia when in actual service in time of war or public danger..."

 

From then, until today, the federal grand jury remains an integral part of the justice system, used by federal prosecutors for a variety of potential crimes. In 1801, a federal grand jury indicted Colonel Aaron Burr for treason. Most recently, federal grand juries considered allegations related to the Oklahoma City and New York Trade Center bombings, President Clinton's conduct both before and during his term of office, and the recent claims of wrongdoing by former California Insurance Commissioner Chuck Quackenbush and some associates.

 

https://www.glenn.courts.ca.gov/divisions/grand-jury/history-grand-jury

 

 

Why Prosecutors Choose Grand Juries Instead of Preliminary Hearings

https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/why-prosecutors-choose-grand-juries-preliminary.html#:~:text=Grand Jury Proceedings Are Secret&text=The rule on secrecy is,it provides control of information.

Edited by Family
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
1 hour ago, Family said:

We have made it our own. Breaking secrecy is giving undue deference to this particular defendant..who incites his followers to threaten, harass and harm anyone/everyone from judge to witnesses.

 

After the Revolutionary War ended, the new federal constitution did not include a grand jury. Early American leaders such as John Hancock and James Madison objected. Thereafter, the grand jury was included in the Bill of Rights, as part of the Fifth Amendment, which states, "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia when in actual service in time of war or public danger..."

 

From then, until today, the federal grand jury remains an integral part of the justice system, used by federal prosecutors for a variety of potential crimes. In 1801, a federal grand jury indicted Colonel Aaron Burr for treason. Most recently, federal grand juries considered allegations related to the Oklahoma City and New York Trade Center bombings, President Clinton's conduct both before and during his term of office, and the recent claims of wrongdoing by former California Insurance Commissioner Chuck Quackenbush and some associates.

 

https://www.glenn.courts.ca.gov/divisions/grand-jury/history-grand-jury

 

 

Why Prosecutors Choose Grand Juries Instead of Preliminary Hearings

https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/why-prosecutors-choose-grand-juries-preliminary.html#:~:text=Grand Jury Proceedings Are Secret&text=The rule on secrecy is,it provides control of information.

I don’t really care about Trump, I am speaking in general.  Grand juries give prosecutors and the state too much power which is something that in the end is bad hence the overwhelming number of countries that disdain it.  So if we keep,using them, their proceedings should not be done in secret as nothing done by the state against its citizens and residents should be secret.

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New York hearing indicates trial still set to start Oct 2, 2023
 

At times, Judge Arthur Engoron argued with Trump attorney Christopher Kise. In one case the judge ended a back-and-forth by simply saying, “Disagree.”

Later, the judge pounded his fist on the top of his bench in disagreement with Kise’s interpretation of one law, opining the intent of that law is, “You cannot make false statements

 


https://apnews.com/article/trump-james-new-york-investment-fraud-ff102cde324ca748ed83dd0e66de28a0

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
On 9/23/2023 at 12:06 PM, Family said:

New York hearing indicates trial still set to start Oct 2, 2023
 

At times, Judge Arthur Engoron argued with Trump attorney Christopher Kise. In one case the judge ended a back-and-forth by simply saying, “Disagree.”

Later, the judge pounded his fist on the top of his bench in disagreement with Kise’s interpretation of one law, opining the intent of that law is, “You cannot make false statements

 


https://apnews.com/article/trump-james-new-york-investment-fraud-ff102cde324ca748ed83dd0e66de28a0

 

Ahh, Michael Cohen again.  :rofl:  I guess it is the AP, although not really sure why you posted the Atlanta video with the story from NY.

 

If the trial proceeds, the attorney general’s office could call to the witness stand Trump’s former lawyer, Michael Cohen

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

Tulsi Gabbard Lets Democrats Have It Over Weaponizing Our Justice System for Political Gain

 

[...] she had some things to say about the Biden administration utilizing the American justice system to attack its political opponents, namely Republican nominee and former President Donald Trump.  The former congresswoman posted a clip on X decrying what she called the "obvious attempt" by Democrats to damage Trump before the 2024 elections.  [...]

 

https://redstate.com/brandon_morse/2023/09/25/tulsi-gabbard-lets-democrats-have-it-over-weaponizing-our-justice-system-for-political-gain-n2164258

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...