[Master Thread] Federal & State Charges Against Pres. Trump [merged]

[TBoneTX 45,240]

Democrats Clarify That No One Is Above The Law That They Selectively Enforce

 

WASHINGTON, D.C. — As news dropped that former President Donald Trump was facing a third federal indictment, Democrats were quick to explain that no American citizen is above the law they only selectively enforce.

"Absolutely no one is exempt, unless we say so," said Attorney General Merrick Garland.  "Even the President is subject to the law, except in cases where I decide he can totally do whatever he wants without any consequences whatsoever."  [...]

 

https://babylonbee.com/news/democrats-clarify-that-no-one-is-above-the-law-that-they-selectively-enforce

[Ban Hammer 13,326]

another thread merged into this one........
the below (in bold) copied and pasted from the original post in this thread:

 

Quote

Moderation Note:  As part of decluttering the CEHST forum, related threads will be merged into master threads as time allows.  

 

continuing to create new threads when there is an existing master thread on the same subject will be viewed as 
spamming and can result in unwanted moderator attention.

charles
vj moderation

[Dashinka 24,471]

11 hours ago, Family said:

History does look favorably on those who win .. can lead and unite. 
 

Loved the catch a case reference 😂 that too is changing : Murdaugh , Trump

Not much uniting going on under Old Corrupt Joe.

[Dashinka 24,471]

9 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

The New Charges Against Trump 'May' Carry the Death Penalty

 

[...] Breitbart reported Tuesday that "Special Counsel Jack Smith's indictment Tuesday against former President Donald Trump for his role in attempting to challenge the results of the 2020 presidential election includes several weighty felonies, including one for which death may be a penalty."  [...]

 

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/robert-spencer/2023/08/02/the-new-charges-against-trump-carry-the-death-penalty-n1715460

I am sure Biden will lift the moratorium on the Federal death penalty for this.

[Family 3,988]

 

 

21 hours ago, Family said:

This thread began June 9, 2024 with Trump-Charging Document. 

In the face of hostile takeover , it attempted to nudge a safe haven as Trump-Charges formerly known as Trump-Charging Document.

 

We shall forge ahead, notwithstanding the challenges ..though we are not amused 😂

 

The views , “ attitude “ and spirit of this post are not aligned with Master T     thus we hope there remains a bit of room on VJ ( off topic or hot topics) for a voice of the other half. 
 

Here goes :

 

Could Donald Trump serve as president if convicted?

By Zachary B. Wolf and Jack Forrest, CNN

Updated 8:43 AM EDT, Wed August 2, 2023

 

02:17 - Source: CNN

Fmr. prosecutor: Why it's difficult to send powerful people to prison

 

CNN — 

Donald Trump has been indicted on federal charges related to 2020 election subversion, a stunning third time this year that the former president has faced criminal charges. 

But could the former president, who remains the front-runner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, assume the Oval Office again if convicted of the alleged crimes? In short, yes.

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2023/08/01/politics/president-serve-vote-indictment-trump-2020-election/index.html

 

Ahh..Trump-Charging Document , Trump-Charges formerly known as Trump-Charging Document and now Trump Felonies @Family Thread have been “merged” into Master Thread . …
 

I think , I am getting the point that only one Trump Topic is allowed from here on…

[Dashinka 24,471]

2 minutes ago, Family said:

 

 

Ahh..Trump-Charging Document , Trump-Charges formerly known as Trump-Charging Document and now Trump Felonies @Family Thread have been “merged” into Master Thread . …
 

I think , I am getting the point that only one Trump Topic is allowed from here on…

I realize you are talking to yourself, but you do not get it.  Based on my reading you are fine to start a thread about Trump that does not deal with the legal issues the MSM wants to promote, but threads dealing with what the vaunted Jack Smith, or any other Trump prosecution issues (NYC, GA, etc.) belong in one place. 

[Family 3,988]

11 minutes ago, Dashinka said:

11 hours ago, Family said:

History does look favorably on those who win .. can lead and unite. 
 

Loved the catch a case reference 😂 that too is changing : Murdaugh , Trump

Not much uniting going on under Old Corrupt Joe.

Thou art the voice of reason , in this realm..says she with apprehension of catching a VJ case ..again😂

[Crazy Cat 41,790]

Out of the mouth of a former dem:

 

 

[TBoneTX 45,240]

This is in very plain, readable English.  Comments?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Show Trial, American Style

 

The indictments of Donald Trump represent a power play, not the interests of justice.  [...]

 

https://americanmind.org/salvo/show-trial-american-style/

 

[TBoneTX 45,240]

Catherine Herridge: Lawyer says special counsel might not have reviewed records before indictment

 

[...] CBS News' Catherine Herridge reports that the lawyer for former NYPD commissioner Bernard Kerick says the special counsel may not have reviewed records before indicting Trump.  [...]

 

https://twitchy.com/brettt/2023/08/03/catherine-herridge-lawyer-says-special-counsel-might-not-have-reviewed-records-before-indictment-n2385970

[Dashinka 24,471]

Sums it up pretty well.

 

Two Sets of Laws for Two Americas

 

So far Joe Biden seems exempt from just such legal jeopardy.

 

But as a senator and Vice President with no right, as does a president, to declassify files, Biden removed and, as a private citizen kept for years classified files in unsecure locations.

 

Biden’s team strangely revealed the unlawful removals after years of silence.

 

It did so because the Biden administration found itself in the untenable position of prosecuting the former president for “crimes” that the current president committed as well—albeit far earlier and longer.

 

https://amgreatness.com/2023/08/03/two-sets-of-laws-for-two-americas/

[TBoneTX 45,240]

Trump Charged With Questioning Election Results While Not Being A Democrat

 

[...] "The sacred words penned in our Constitution, which I have so much reverence for, make it clear that only Democrats are allowed to question election results," said Smith to reporters.  [...]

 

https://babylonbee.com/news/trump-charged-with-questioning-election-results-while-not-being-a-democrat

[TBoneTX 45,240]

Jonathan Turley.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Even lies are protected speech: New Trump indictment bulldozes the First Amendment

 

The latest federal indictment of former President Donald Trump was handed down this week with all of the authority of papal infallibility.  [...]

 

https://thehill.com/opinion/criminal-justice/4137650-even-lies-are-protected-speech-new-trump-indictment-bulldozes-the-first-amendment/

[TBoneTX 45,240]

The Indictment of Donald Trump Is The Real Threat To Democracy

 

[...] Having previously colluded with social media companies to censor disfavored opinions about the 2020 election, our ruling class, led by the Justice Department, now wants to criminalize such Wrongthink and deter those who would defend the Wrongthinkers.

 

Special Counsel Smith does so by reading President Trump's mind, claiming that despite what he has always maintained, Trump didn't really believe the election was stolen from him; that his election challenges were therefore fraudulent; and that thus he must be charged under whatever statutes can be twisted to fit the thought crimes.  [...]

 

https://www.newsweek.com/trump-jan-6-indictment-latest-strike-war-wrongthink-opinion-1817283

[TBoneTX 45,240]

Analysis worth a read.  Comments?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Jonathan Turley spells out how foul the Trump indictment really is

 

[...] Turley notes that the Democrats were protected when they went on and on about "Russia, Russia, Russia," despite knowing that what they said was untrue.  That's because of the enormous latitude we give to political speech.  The rules change for Trump, though:  [...]

 

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2023/08/jonathan_turley_spells_out_how_foul_the_trump_indictment_really_is.html