Jump to content

1,136 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Operation Get Trump

 

For the FBI and other agencies, going too far has been worth it in the past

 

https://thespectator.com/topic/operation-get-trump/

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Rule of law?  What rule of law?

 

[...] Lots of people are convinced that Trump ran roughshod over the Constitution, but even in his worst moments he grumbled mightily but followed the law.

 

Great example: he campaigned on "Lock her up!"  Yet he never even pushed for an investigation.  Pretty big contrast to how Trump is being treated by Biden, who mumbles about the rule of law yet uses the FBI as his own personal Stasi.  [...]

 

https://hotair.com/david-strom/2023/07/25/rule-of-law-what-rule-of-law-n566839

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Posted (edited)
14 hours ago, Pooky said:

He was still giving his speech when protesters were already in the Capitol Building. 
 

As far as I know, mass time travel is still science fiction, not to mention there are a million and one more useful things to do if it was possible 😎

The “ demonstration “ unfolded pretty much according to “ plans “ drafted , discussed and in the works since November . ..between Trump , his camp, Liason attorney and his own rallies security force .

 

So timing of speech and crowd movement did not require time travel …or even mind reading . ..just a few Friends In Low Places  
 

 

https://www.jan-6.com/january-6-was-coordinated-attack?gclid=Cj0KCQjw5f2lBhCkARIsAHeTvlgldGilVD0sRUnie8RyXq57RvQXQbR-c1C0nGP5aUaIxfgUklIM_YsaArC0EALw_wcB

did set out a comprehensive plan and timeline for the day, setting seven high-profile government buildings near the Capitol as targets. The plan outlined in the document was very similar to the actual events of January 6. 

 

The plan was broken into five stages: “Infiltrate,” “Execution,” “Distract,” “Occupy,” and “Sit-In.” The document recommended having at least 50 people approach the seven government buildings, while appearing “unsuspecting.” 

 

Once crowds were at the buildings, organizers were supposed to enter the buildings, “causing trouble” if necessary. If crowds were to be unable to enter those buildings, they were instructed to pull fire alarms at other nearby buildings to distract guards and police. Then, protestors were instructed to conduct sit-ins at these buildings, and to chant slogans. Aside from giving details about January 6, the document recommended for protestors to “scope out” the roads nearby the buildings in the

 

 



 

Edited by Family
Posted
7 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

Rule of law?  What rule of law?

 

[...] Lots of people are convinced that Trump ran roughshod over the Constitution, but even in his worst moments he grumbled mightily but followed the law.

 

Great example: he campaigned on "Lock her up!"  Yet he never even pushed for an investigation.  Pretty big contrast to how Trump is being treated by Biden, who mumbles about the rule of law yet uses the FBI as his own personal Stasi.  [...]

 

https://hotair.com/david-strom/2023/07/25/rule-of-law-what-rule-o


Above bit bit is Rewriting history no less..😂


https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/477641-doj-inquiry-tied-to-clinton-and-touted-by-trump-winds-down-with-no/amp/

The investigation started after Trump and GOP allies in Congress raised concerns over former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s ties to a Russian nuclear agency

 

 

Posted
On 7/21/2023 at 10:46 AM, TBoneTX said:

The Capitol disturbance started at least half an hour before Pres. Trump finished speaking.

I love the smell of upvotes in the morning.  Smells like MOR

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted
3 hours ago, Family said:

The “ demonstration “ unfolded pretty much according to “ plans “ drafted , discussed and in the works since November . ..between Trump , his camp, Liason attorney and his own rallies security force .

 

So timing of speech and crowd movement did not require time travel …or even mind reading . ..just a few Friends In Low Places  
 

 

https://www.jan-6.com/january-6-was-coordinated-attack?gclid=Cj0KCQjw5f2lBhCkARIsAHeTvlgldGilVD0sRUnie8RyXq57RvQXQbR-c1C0nGP5aUaIxfgUklIM_YsaArC0EALw_wcB

did set out a comprehensive plan and timeline for the day, setting seven high-profile government buildings near the Capitol as targets. The plan outlined in the document was very similar to the actual events of January 6. 

 

The plan was broken into five stages: “Infiltrate,” “Execution,” “Distract,” “Occupy,” and “Sit-In.” The document recommended having at least 50 people approach the seven government buildings, while appearing “unsuspecting.” 

 

Once crowds were at the buildings, organizers were supposed to enter the buildings, “causing trouble” if necessary. If crowds were to be unable to enter those buildings, they were instructed to pull fire alarms at other nearby buildings to distract guards and police. Then, protestors were instructed to conduct sit-ins at these buildings, and to chant slogans. Aside from giving details about January 6, the document recommended for protestors to “scope out” the roads nearby the buildings in the

 

 



 

Was Nancy Pelosi a friend in low places?  Seems she was definitely game in keeping Capitol security lax that day.

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Posted
3 minutes ago, Dashinka said:

Was Nancy Pelosi a friend in low places?  Seems she was definitely game in keeping Capitol security lax that day.

Thy speaketh the fair maidens name 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
8 hours ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

the fair maiden

Where's the "vomit" emoji?

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Country: England
Timeline
Posted

The part that struck me was …

 

Fani Willis, the Fulton County district attorney criminally investigating his attempt to overturn the 2020 election in Georgia has “developed evidence …”

 

Now, I’m no lawyer, but evidence is usually discovered, as it is something that already exists. When something is developed, that means it was not there in the first place and had to be manufactured.  Not at all fishy. 🤧

Don't interrupt me when I'm talking to myself

2011-11-15.garfield.png

Posted
5 hours ago, Pooky said:

The part that struck me was …

 

Fani Willis, the Fulton County district attorney criminally investigating his attempt to overturn the 2020 election in Georgia has “developed evidence …”

 

Now, I’m no lawyer, but evidence is usually discovered, as it is something that already exists. When something is developed, that means it was not there in the first place and had to be manufactured.  Not at all fishy. 🤧

According to ABA , the term develop evidence is indeed lawyer talk….but I am sure all prosecutors do a great deal fishing before they catch the big one.


 

https://www.americanbar.org/groups/criminal_justice/publications/criminal_justice_section_archive/crimjust_standards_pinvestigate/

ii) develop legally admissible evidence sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction of those who are guilty and 

Posted (edited)

Republican who gave speech on Jan 6 , now publicly offering to testify for DOJ

 

 

Former lawmaker says Trump asked him to overturn the 2020 election but so far special counsel hasn't contacted him

Former Rep. Mo Brooks is “mildly surprised” that special counsel Jack Smith’s office has not sought a meeting with him to discuss his accusations that former President Donald Trump urged him to help “rescind” the 2020 election and “violate the U.S. Constitution and federal law.” 

Brooks, a Republican who represented an Alabama district in Congress, said in an interview that he would meet with prosecutors if they ask. 

 

“Yeah, if they asked me to, I’d explain what I know about it. Whether it’s relevant or material, I’m not sure,” he said, continuing: “I was shocked [Trump] was so blatant about it — illegal conduct.”

. 
Edited by Family
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted (edited)

Superman Jack Smith at it again.  What is the over-under on him being slapped down again?

Edited by Dashinka

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...