Jump to content
TBoneTX

[Master Thread] Federal & State Charges Against Pres. Trump [merged]

 Share

1,127 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Country: England
Timeline
4 hours ago, Family said:

Sure signs criminal charges/arrest coming..against 
 

 

Trump says he’s received a target letter from special counsel Jack Smith’s Jan. 6 investigators.

 

Such a letter “almost always means an arrest and indictment,” Trump, who has already been criminally indicted twice

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/07/18/trump-says-hes-received-a-target-letter-from-special-counsel-jack-smiths-jan-6-investigators-00106776

Got to keep it in the news cycle. Any day that they can’t keep DJT firmly in the media crosshairs is a propaganda disaster 😒

Don't interrupt me when I'm talking to myself

2011-11-15.garfield.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Fake Electors   facing Felony Charges, round one ( Michigan )
 

16 false Trump electors face felony charges in Michigan

 

Lansing — Attorney General Dana Nessel is leveling felony charges against 16 Republicans who signed a certificate falsely stating that Donald Trump won Michigan's 2020 presidential election, launching criminal cases against top political figures inside the state GOP.

Each of the 16 electors, including former Michigan Republican Party Co-Chairwoman Meshawn Maddock and Shelby Township Clerk Stan Grot, have been charged with eight felony counts, including forgery and conspiracy to commit election law forgery, according to Nessel's office

 

https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/michigan/2023/07/18/michigan-donald-trump-fake-electors-charged-felonies-attorney-general-dana-nessel/70427042007/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
8 hours ago, Family said:

target letter from special counsel Jack Smith

Preliminary consensus from radio talk is that, if the case is tried in D.C., it's 99.44% certain that the verdict will be guilty (even before the case is heard), and at least a 50% possibility of immediate imprisonment.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: England
Timeline
31 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

Preliminary consensus from radio talk is that, if the case is tried in D.C., it's 99.44% certain that the verdict will be guilty (even before the case is heard), and at least a 50% possibility of immediate imprisonment.

They really are trying to fire up the Donald Trump Matters movement and create the conditions for rioting in the streets prior to the 2024 election.

 

I hope they realise that Kyle Rittenhouse would be facing down more than a menacing-looking skateboard this time.

Don't interrupt me when I'm talking to myself

2011-11-15.garfield.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
1 hour ago, Family said:

 Fake Electors   facing Felony Charges, round one ( Michigan )
 

16 false Trump electors face felony charges in Michigan

 

Lansing — Attorney General Dana Nessel is leveling felony charges against 16 Republicans who signed a certificate falsely stating that Donald Trump won Michigan's 2020 presidential election, launching criminal cases against top political figures inside the state GOP.

Each of the 16 electors, including former Michigan Republican Party Co-Chairwoman Meshawn Maddock and Shelby Township Clerk Stan Grot, have been charged with eight felony counts, including forgery and conspiracy to commit election law forgery, according to Nessel's office

 

https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/michigan/2023/07/18/michigan-donald-trump-fake-electors-charged-felonies-attorney-general-dana-nessel/70427042007/

Ahh, more political prosecutions.  Good Old Dana Nessel does have issues with the drink.

 

Out Michigan Attorney General offers refreshing apology for getting ...

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/michigans-ag-got-drunk-football-game-wrote-facebook-rcna5207

Edited by Dashinka

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TBoneTX said:
10 hours ago, Family said:

target letter from special counsel Jack Smith

Preliminary consensus from radio talk is that, if the case is tried in D.C., it's 99.44% certain that the verdict will be guilty (even before the case is heard), and at least a 50% possibility of immediate imprisonment.

Wasn’t that what they said about O.J. Simpson 😂

I am holding out for legal arguments ..because as we know defendant served self incriminating evidence ( phone, tests, emails , witnesses , interviews, social media) on a silver platter to DOJ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
3 hours ago, Pooky said:

They really are trying to fire up the Donald Trump Matters movement and create the conditions for rioting in the streets prior to the 2024 election.

They would gun everyone down without a second thought and probably without notice.

They would then declare martial law and begin wholesale political imprisonments.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: England
Timeline
3 hours ago, Family said:

Both stem from Espionage Act Tree and argument is limited to pre trial release…
 

image.jpeg.c293fd0c8ee75192b101aef046afdef2.jpeg

Just one slight difference. Texeira disseminated the information intentionally. DJT waved a bunch of papers around (which do not feature in the current charges).

 

The use of the espionage act is appropriate in the Texeira case, but a huge stretch in the DJT case, an over-charging scenario that should see him acquitted.

Don't interrupt me when I'm talking to myself

2011-11-15.garfield.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: England
Timeline
On 7/16/2023 at 11:18 PM, Family said:

Was thinking more of Babe Ruth when it comes to Prosecutor Jack’s past critiques. ..

 


https://blog.playo.co/4-sportspersons-who-failed-big-time-before-becoming-super-stars/amp/
4 Inspiring sportspersons who failed big time before becoming superstars

 

But did you know that for nearly a decade he held the record for the most number of strikeouts? That’s right, he got out at least 1330 times before even making contact with the bal 

The difference here is that Babe Ruth had proven talent. A strikeout for him was no big deal, because 2 or 3 at-bats down the road that ball was going sailing into the stands. The hits more than covered the misses.

 

For Jack Smith, the talent is what is in question. His methods and ethics are questionable, and that runs to his team also. And for him, a strikeout is a really big deal. Unlike baseball, he doesn’t get a second bite at the cherry. If he loses, that’s it.

 

With the documented misdeeds of some of his team already in the public domain, despite this case being nowhere near trial yet, his case is in trouble, even if the facts might back it up.

 

Jack Smith is no Babe Ruth.

Don't interrupt me when I'm talking to myself

2011-11-15.garfield.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: England
Timeline
57 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

They would gun everyone down without a second thought and probably without notice.

They would then declare martial law and begin wholesale political imprisonments.

Thus would start the Second American Civil War. ☠️

Don't interrupt me when I'm talking to myself

2011-11-15.garfield.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

They would gun everyone down without a second thought and probably without notice.

They would then declare martial law and begin wholesale political imprisonments

Curious who They are …the Q-up, FOX_up MAGA faction of Republican Party? I cannot see the the whole party gunning down little old ladies and children 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: England
Timeline
21 minutes ago, Family said:

Curious who They are …the Q-up, FOX_up MAGA faction of Republican Party? I cannot see the the whole party gunning down little old ladies and children 

You appear to have misunderstood.

 

The “They” being referred to here are law enforcement, government department paramilitaries (EPA and FBI SWAT teams anyone?) and the National Guard, filled by the actual military upon declaration of martial law.

 

Uunlike what happened when BLM and Antifa were the actual rioters.

Don't interrupt me when I'm talking to myself

2011-11-15.garfield.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Pooky said:

You appear to have misunderstood.

 

The “They” being referred to here are law enforcement, government department paramilitaries (EPA and FBI SWAT teams anyone?) and the National Guard, filled by the actual military upon declaration of martial law.

 

Uunlike what happened when BLM and Antifa were the actual rioters.

Thank you. I did catch that 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...