Jump to content
TBoneTX

[Master Thread] Federal & State Charges Against Pres. Trump [merged]

 Share

1,128 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

 

1 hour ago, Dashinka said:

Superman Jack Smith at it again.  What is the over-under on him being slapped down again

Our Hero may invoke some new powers from recent decision of the Supremes ..and I expect another superb Charging Doc smack down…in plain Everyman language.

 

IpMaybe Trump lawyers are burning the midnight oil with prep..cause the rape trial attorney was not worth a nickel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trump faces additional charges in Mar-a-Lago documents case

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-charged-special-counsel-jack-smith-rcna96742

The federal indictment, filed in the Southern District of Florida, alleges that Trump was part of a scheme to delete security video and that a newly charged defendant — who was identified as a property manager at Trump's Mar-a-Lago residence — told another employee that "the boss" wanted the server deleted.

 

That employee, Carlos De Oliveira, who was a maintenance supervisor at Mar-a-Lago, was charged Thursday

The superseding indictment claims that Nauta and De Oliveira met up at a security guard booth where security video was displayed on monitors and that De Oliveira later stepped into an audio closet with another employee and had a conversation that De Oliveira said should be kept between them

 

 

De Oliveira reiterated that "the boss" wanted it done and asked, "what are we going to do?" according to the indictment.

That conversation took place in late June 2022, just a few weeks before the FBI searched Mar-a-Lago, the indictment says. After the search, it alleges, Nauta called another Trump employee and asked about De Oliveira. The unnamed Trump employee told Nauta that De Oliveira was loyal and would not do anything to affect his relationship with Trump, according to the indictment.

Nauta later wrote in a Signal chat with the representative of a Trump PAC that De Oliveira was loyal, and Trump later called De Oliveira and told the maintenance worker that Trump would get him a lawyer, the indictment says.

Edited by Family
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: England
Timeline
32 minutes ago, Family said:

… Trump was part of a scheme to delete security video …

So how is this worthy of a federal indictment, where no actual documents were tampered with, yet destroying a server on which classified information was kept, in contravention of known protocols and by a White House appointee and so a person of lesser standing, is not.

 

if you wanted an example of a double standard in the application of the law, this is as clear as a punch in the face 😒

Don't interrupt me when I'm talking to myself

2011-11-15.garfield.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Pooky said:

So how is this worthy of a federal indictment

Creeping Best Friends GIF by Mickey Mouse
 

Trump "requested" deletion of security footage: The indictment accuses Trump of being part of the effort to delete security footage from Mar-a-Lago, his Florida resort, after it was subpoenaed, saying that Trump “requested” that a resort employee delete footage in order “to prevent the footage from being provided to a federal grand jury.”

 

https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-2020-election-probe/index.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: England
Timeline
32 minutes ago, Family said:

Creeping Best Friends GIF by Mickey Mouse
 

Trump "requested" deletion of security footage: The indictment accuses Trump of being part of the effort to delete security footage from Mar-a-Lago, his Florida resort, after it was subpoenaed, saying that Trump “requested” that a resort employee delete footage in order “to prevent the footage from being provided to a federal grand jury.”

 

https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-2020-election-probe/index.html

Evading the point doesn’t lessen the glaring double standard playing out in full view of the public. The harder your “hero” pushes, the less likely he is to convince a jury to convict.

 

And all the while, DJT’s poll numbers will keep getting better, making Sleepy Joe look unable to win. Which begs the question, is this part of a political play to rig the 2024 Presidential Election?

Don't interrupt me when I'm talking to myself

2011-11-15.garfield.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Pooky said:
1 hour ago, Family said:

Creeping Best Friends GIF by Mickey Mouse
 

Trump "requested" deletion of security footage: The indictment accuses Trump of being part of the effort to delete security footage from Mar-a-Lago, his Florida resort, after it was subpoenaed, saying that Trump “requested” that a resort employee delete footage in order “to prevent the footage from being provided to a federal grand jury.”

 

https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-2020-election-probe/index.html

Expand  

Evading the point doesn’t lessen the glaring double standard playing out in full view of the public. The harder your “hero” pushes, the less likely he is to convince a jury to convict.

 

And all the while, DJT’s poll numbers will keep getting better, making Sleepy Joe look unable to win. Which begs the question, is this part of a political play to rig the 2024 Presidential Election?

Am not sure there are any points …other than Allegations , Evidence and ensuing trial of Defendant “the boss”  , His Man Nauta and new Loyal Boy. 
 

We will see legal challenges from defense lawyers at trial…as far as I can tell Poor Me…You Should go Catch the Other Guy..doesn’t usually work in court..even with a Trump appointed judge.

 

If he gets elected ..as a convicted felon ..well then as George Carlin puts it..it’s a reflection on the public/ people who vote for him..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

The security footage is his own private property.

And yes, the country was really endangered by moving documents internally under 24/7 Secret Service protection.  :bonk: 

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

The security footage is his own private property.

And yes, the country was really endangered by moving documents internally under 24/7 Secret Service protection.  :bonk:

I guess he could argue that …it’s mine and I can do what I want with it…but isn’t that a bit like how he got in this  mess..? The Boxes are Mine ,,all Mine! No one touches the Beautiful Mind Boxes! Subpoenas ..my foot! ..😂
 

Edited by Family
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link ..The amended charging document filed today 07/27/2024. Details on Trump getting notice from his attorney that a  subpoena for security cameras tapes was served . Same day 2 hours later he makes the call to delete server and next day sends His Man Nauta to Mar Lago to take care of…business.

 

 

https://www.justice.gov/storage/US-v-Trump-Nauta-De-Oliveira-23-80101.pdf

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline

Hmm, seems Superman Jack Smith is following a political playbook here.  Who could have guessed, after Hunter’s farce of a plea agreement fell apart, and it being covered by the Leftist media, we would not see Old Corrupt Joe, and his minion Garland directing Jack “Lex Luther” Smith to get Trump back front and center in the MSM.  I guess since Jack did not do his job initially, probably more grounds for delaying everything.

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
7 hours ago, Pooky said:

So how is this worthy of a federal indictment, where no actual documents were tampered with, yet destroying a server on which classified information was kept, in contravention of known protocols and by a White House appointee and so a person of lesser standing, is not.

 

if you wanted an example of a double standard in the application of the law, this is as clear as a punch in the face 😒

No doubt.  The DC elite are doing so much to destroy the reputation of the DOJ it is amazing.  I guess they feel there are enough gaslighted folks out there now it doesn’t really matter (I.e. they feel they have a firm grip on power).

 

 

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Dashinka said:

Hmm, seems Superman Jack Smith is following a political playbook here.  Who could have guessed, after Hunter’s farce of a plea agreement fell apart, and it being covered by the Leftist media, we would not see Old Corrupt Joe, and his minion Garland directing Jack “Lex Luther” Smith to get Trump back front and center in the MSM.  I guess since Jack did not do his job initially, probably more grounds for delaying everything.

The phenomenon of defending Trump , not by defending his innocence ( discussing the allegations/ evidence) but accepting guilt as So What If and This is a Good Time to rip Others ( Joe, Hunter, Hillary..The Deep, The Elite…etc)…a bit odd but yeah…it’s the only voice of die hard defenders

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
1 hour ago, Family said:

The phenomenon of defending Trump , not by defending his innocence ( discussing the allegations/ evidence) but accepting guilt as So What If and This is a Good Time to rip Others ( Joe, Hunter, Hillary..The Deep, The Elite…etc)…a bit odd but yeah…it’s the only voice of die hard defenders

 

Don't really care about Trump.  I do care about a two tier criminal justice system that you seem to be fine with.  Whatever, it is what it is.  For all we know, Trump is doing this to expose the system as it stands today.  Regardless, it was very predictable what happened yesterday that even Helen Keller could have seen it.  I am sure Superman Smith wanted a Jan. 6th indictment, but short of that, apparently he had these charges in his back pocket to be used when politically expedient.

Edited by Dashinka

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Dashinka said:

Don't really care about Trump.  I do care about a two tier criminal justice system that you seem to be fine with.  Whatever, it is what it is.  For all we know, Trump is doing this to expose the system as it stands today.  Regardless, it was very predictable what happened yesterday that even Helen Keller could have seen it.  I am sure Superman Smith wanted a Jan. 6th indictment, but short of that, apparently he had these charges in his back pocket to be used when politically expedient.

Edited 13 hours ago by Dashinka

Some speculate Prosecutor may have a few aces up his sleeve left..such as the identity of Employee # 2 as a collaborating witness. ..
 

Considering the lies Trump keeps pushing on election fraud..who knows if Dominion won’t sue him as well .

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...