Jump to content
MyNameIsEarl

Officer said NO to N400 after I751 combo interview

 Share

60 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, TeddyFazBear said:

There is no reason on earth NOT to send everything you got, absolutely none. It’s laughable how people here seem to think it’s their job to decide what the officer wants to see.  

I will support this, perhaps, unpopular opinion. Whenever I read I-751 instructions and interpret them literally, I come to that conclusion:

- "Submit copies of documents indicating that the marriage upon which you were granted status was entered in good faith and was not for the purpose of circumventing immigration laws. Submit copies of as many documents as you can to establish this fact, to demonstrate the circumstances of the relationship from the date of the marriage to the present date;"

 

This is supported by a few lawyers I asked this question (including the one I worked with), and by Jim Hacking (YouTube guy) too.

 

It's always immigrant's burden to prove they're eligible for a benefit.

 

I'm not advocating sending local bus schedules to USCIS. Only relevant information supporting bonafide marriage in whatever volume it takes: if it's 1000 pages, let it be 1000 pages. In a nicely organized packet, officer can easily find whatever they're interested in. In my personal experience, there's no way IO will read every letter in a bank statement. Unless there's something specific they're looking for, they'll get a few samples from here and there and make a decision. Solid packet will be a good indicator the applicant takes immigration laws and rules seriously. It will also highlight the effort that went into collecting ans organizing evidence.

 

 

Edited by OldUser
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Australia
Timeline
On 7/23/2023 at 10:25 AM, Boiler said:

Also a Quality person, now I may not be normal but if somebody dumped a load of ####### on me and I need to look for the nuggets I would be wondering what they were trying to hide. 

Possible. This tactic is used in discovery in both civil and criminal cases - instead of trying to stonewall discovery and not provide information at all, you can instead bury the other party in paperwork by providing them every scrap of paper that is remotely or tangentially related to the case. However, for the average Joe, it's harder to provide tons of pages of evidence if the relationship isn't bona fide to begin with. So I seriously doubt this would apply to many marriage-based immigration cases. 

23 hours ago, OldUser said:

I will support this, perhaps, unpopular opinion. Whenever I read I-751 instructions and interpret them literally, I come to that conclusion:

- "Submit copies of documents indicating that the marriage upon which you were granted status was entered in good faith and was not for the purpose of circumventing immigration laws. Submit copies of as many documents as you can to establish this fact, to demonstrate the circumstances of the relationship from the date of the marriage to the present date;"

 

This is supported by a few lawyers I asked this question (including the one I worked with), and by Jim Hacking (YouTube guy) too.

 

It's always immigrant's burden to prove they're eligible for a benefit.

 

I'm not advocating sending local bus schedules to USCIS. Only relevant information supporting bonafide marriage in whatever volume it takes: if it's 1000 pages, let it be 1000 pages. In a nicely organized packet, officer can easily find whatever they're interested in. In my personal experience, there's no way IO will read every letter in a bank statement. Unless there's something specific they're looking for, they'll get a few samples from here and there and make a decision. Solid packet will be a good indicator the applicant takes immigration laws and rules seriously. It will also highlight the effort that went into collecting ans organizing evidence.

 

 

I agree with you, but I also think that the focus should be on high-quality evidence. We sent over 500 pages of evidence with our I-751, but 90% of it was strong evidence of financial comingling and living together. If you send 500 pages consisting of photos, chat logs and affidavits, it's not going to look good. 

K1 to AOS                                                                                   AOS/EAD/AP                                                                      N-400

03/01/2018 - I-129F Mailed                                              06/19/2019 - NOA1 Date                                              01/27/2023 - N-400 Filed Online

03/08/2018 - NOA1 Date                                                    07/11/2019 - Biometrics Appt                                   02/23/2023 - Biometrics Appt
09/14/2018 - NOA2 Date                                                    12/13/2019 - EAD/AP Approved                               04/03/2023 - Interview Scheduled

10/16/2018 - NVC Received                                              12/17/2019 - Interview Scheduled                          05/10/2023 - Interview - APPROVED!

10/21/2018 - Packet 3 Received                                      01/29/2020 - Interview - APPROVED!                  OFFICIALLY A U.S. CITIZEN! 

12/30/2018 - Packet 3 Sent                                               02/04/2020 - Green Card Received! 

01/06/2019 - Packet 4 Received                                     ROC - I-751

01/29/2019 - Interview - APPROVED!                           11/02/2021 - Mailed ROC Packet

02/05/2019 - Visa Received                                             11/04/2021 - NOA1 Date

05/17/2019 - U.S. Arrival                                                     01/19/2022 - Biometrics Waived

05/24/2019 - Married ❤️                                                    02/04/2023 - Transferred to New Office

06/14/2019 - Mailed AOS Packet                                    05/10/2023 - APPROVED!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline
6 minutes ago, beloved_dingo said:

Possible. This tactic is used in discovery in both civil and criminal cases - instead of trying to stonewall discovery and not provide information at all, you can instead bury the other party in paperwork by providing them every scrap of paper that is remotely or tangentially related to the case. However, for the average Joe, it's harder to provide tons of pages of evidence if the relationship isn't bona fide to begin with. So I seriously doubt this would apply to many marriage-based immigration cases. 

I agree with you, but I also think that the focus should be on high-quality evidence. We sent over 500 pages of evidence with our I-751, but 90% of it was strong evidence of financial comingling and living together. If you send 500 pages consisting of photos, chat logs and affidavits, it's not going to look good. 

 

It is very rare for a I 751 to be refused, here I have seen 2 and both involved Spouses who essentially disappeared after Baggage Reclaim. Now I have seen mention of others elsewhere but all involved really egregious situations, nothing even close to your regular been living together for 2 years but we only sent in 50 pages rather than 100.

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Boiler said:

 

It is very rare for a I 751 to be refused, here I have seen 2 and both involved Spouses who essentially disappeared after Baggage Reclaim. Now I have seen mention of others elsewhere but all involved really egregious situations, nothing even close to your regular been living together for 2 years but we only sent in 50 pages rather than 100.

So say somebody sends only evidence since becoming LPR (instructions tell since date of marriage). Say only quarterly statements are sent to save space. Say the evidence is for the last 7 quarters (because filing 90 days early)

 

Joint checking = 2 pages per statement, 7 quarters => 14 pages

 

Joint savings (same as above) => 14 pages

 

Lease (very short one, haven't moved at all) => 3 pages

 

Photos (3 per page, 7-8 in total) => 3 pages

 

Gas / electric bill, 2 pages per statement, 7 quarters => 14 pages

 

Internet / Phone / Other utility, 2 pages per statement, 7 quarters => 14 pages

 

GC copy => 1 page

 

IRS tax return transcript => 4-8 pages (1 vs 2 years)

 

Trip reservations, 2 pages per trip, 2 trips a year => 6 pages

 

I-751 form itself => 11 pages

 

This thin packet would be consisting of just 73 pages of evidence and 11 pages of form itself, 84 in total.

 

I haven't included 2-3 affidavits, page each, car insurance / ownership, club memberships, retirement plans listing spouse, stocks, any medical stuff, birth certificates of kids (if any) in this calculation. I was very conservative with pages per statement. Most of my banks send 4-7 page statements.

 

AFAIK it's not advisable sending partial statements with missing pages, as this can lead to RFE.

 

I cannot wrap my head around how a modest packet can be less than 80+ pages. IMHO it must be lacking evidence?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by OldUser
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/23/2023 at 8:25 AM, Boiler said:

Also a Quality person, now I may not be normal but if somebody dumped a load of ####### on me and I need to look for the nuggets I would be wondering what they were trying to hide. 

No problem there. A good page of contents / index page at the front of packet solves the problem for IO:

 

-------------------------

Form I-751 - page 2-12

 

Bonafide marriage evidence:

 

Joint Bank of America checking statements - Page 13-63

 

Joint Chase bank savings statements - Page 64-80

 

Joint lease agreement- Page 81-85

 

Joint travel - Pages 86-94

 

Green Card Copy - page 95

 

Etc etc

 

I don't know how difficult it can be to find information if it's organized well? 🤷‍♂️

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, OldUser said:

I don't know how difficult it can be to find information if it's organized well? 🤷‍♂️

 

I got an RFIE for divorce decree and other divorce paperwork, and some related stuff, despite my last I-751 having very specific dedicated sections with dividers with big titles written on, one of which - right at the front - was titled 'DIVORCE DECREE' and another 'DIVORCE PAPERWORK'.

Never underestimate stupid.

CR1 / DCF (London): 2012 / 2013 (4 months from I-130 petition to visa in hand)

I-751 #1- April 2015 [Denied]

 

April 2015 : I-751 Joint filing package sent fedex next day 09:00am from UK ($lots - thanks). 
Jan 2017: Notification that an interview has been scheduled at a local office. Bizarrely still no RFE... 
Jan 2017: 2hr wait, then interview terminated before it began, due to moving my ID to another state 2 wks prior. New interview 'in a few months...maybe.'   Informed them that divorce proceedings are underway, but not finalised at this time. 
March 2017: An Interview was scheduled - marked as no-show as they didn't actually send out a notification of interview. FML 
April  2017: Filed an official complaint with the ombudsman, and have requested Senator & Congressman assistance
August 2017: Interview - switched to a (finalised) divorce waiver. Told that decision will be made that afternoon, but no problems foreseen with my case. 
October 2017: Letter of Denial received - reason given as 'I-751 petition was not properly filed'. Discovered ex-spouse made false allegations to USCIS in 2015. No opportunity given to review & refute allegations  - contrary to USCIS policy.

I-751 #2 - Oct 2017 - Mar 2021[Denied] 

 

October 2017: Within 72hrs of receiving denial notice, a new waiver I-751, divorce decree & $680 cheque, sent to Vermont via FedEx overnight 9am priority.  
Dec 2019: Filed FOIA request for full A# file
Feb 2020: FOIA request completed - entire A# file received as a .PDF; 197 pages fully redacted, and 80 partially redacted. Don't waste your time!
March 2021: I-751 #2 denied for lack of evidence. No RFE, no interview, and evidence in previous I-751 not reviewed - contrary to policy. Huge errors in adjudication.

N-400 - Feb 2018 - Apr 2021 [Denied]

 

February 2018: N-400 filed online.  $725 paid to the USCIS paperwork wastage fund

February  2019: Interview - cancelled after a four hour wait due to 'missing paperwork' on their end. Promised Expedited reschedule.

March 2021: Interview letter received, strangely dated after I-751 denial. No I-751 interview conducted. N-400 interview and test passed, given 'cannot make a decision at this time' paper due to the ongoing I-751 nightmare...

April 2021: N-400 denial received citing recent I-751 denial as basis for ineligibility, even though it should have been a combo interview 🤯

I AM JACK'S COMPLETE LACK OF SURPRISE

Service Motion - March 2021 [Sent via FedEx & COMPLETELY IGNORED by USCIS]

 

March 2021: Service Motion request sent overnight addressed direectly to field office director, requesting urgent review and re-opening, based on errors in adjudication - citing USCIS policy, AFM and memorandums as basis for errors. This was completely ignored by USCIS.

 I-751 #3 - June 2021 - Jan 2024 [Denied]

 

IT'S GROUNDHOG DAY

June 2021: I-751 #3 (30+lbs/5000 pages of paperwork) & another $680 sent to USCIS via FedEx ($300+..thanks) .... 

June 2021: Receipt issued, card charged, biometrics waived, infopass scheduled for I-551 stamp number ten.....

Feb 2022: RFIE (no, not an RFE, a Request For Initial Evidence) received, for copies of the divorce paperwork that they already have 😑

July 2022: Infopass for I-551 stamp number eleven.....

August 2023: Infopass for I-551 stamp number twelve....

January 2024: Denial received, ignoring the overwhelming majority of the filing, abundance of evidence, and refutation of a provably false allegation. The denial also contradicts itself in multiple places, as if it was written by someone with an IQ <50.

HAPPY NEW YEAR

 

2024: FML. Seriously. I'm done. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Sweden
Timeline
On 7/22/2023 at 11:25 PM, TeddyFazBear said:

Good for you. But not everyone has that luck. Don’t send people down a dangerous path just because you had an easy experience. There is no reason on earth NOT to send everything you got, absolutely none. It’s laughable how people here seem to think it’s their job to decide what the officer wants to see.  

I agree. I had a similar experience when we sent in our i-129f and were approved even though we only stated that we "met online", no specifics. This was when a lot of other applicants got RFEs for not being specific about what site they met on and if it was an IMBRA site etc. It went great in our case but not in many others', so I would obviously tell anybody to be more specific if it can save them from an RFE. Same goes for evidence - send EVERYTHING, let the IO decide what's good enough and what isn't. 

With that said, this particular case doesn't appear to be about evidence from the posts I have read, so it's a mute point. There appears to be something else that is a big red flag for the IO, maybe they'll get an answer soon. I'd like to know too, so hopefully the thread is updated with any new info. 

Edited by Scandi

K-1: 12-22-2015 - 09-07-2016

AP: 12-20-2016 - 04-07-2017

EAD: 01-18-2017 - 05-30-2017

AOS: 12-20-2016 - 07-26-2017

ROC: 04-22-2019 - 04-22-2020
Naturalization: 05-01-2020 - 03-16-2021

U.S. passport: 03-30-2021 - 05-08-2021

En livstid i krig. Göteborg killed it. Epic:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBs3G1PvyfM&ab_channel=Sabaton

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Argentina
Timeline
On 7/23/2023 at 1:28 PM, Redro said:

@Rocio0010 had a fairly comprehensive package for both I485 and I751--- and did not have to interview--- how many pages was your entire packet, Rocio? 

Ups… sorry, I just saw this! 
Yes, no interview for either AOS or ROC… 

The heaviest package was our ROC simply because we had more bank statements to show, and we sent 24 bank statements. So I’m not sure about how many pages, but I can confidently say that there was not much left of a 3 inch ACCO binder. 

FROM F1 TO AOS

October 17, 2019 AOS receipt date 

December 09, 2019: Biometric appointment

January 15, 2020 RFE received

January 30, 2020  RFE response sent

Feb 7: EAD approved and interview scheduled

March 18, 2020 Interview cancelled

April 14th 2020: RFE received

April 29, 2020 Approved without interview

May 1, 2020 Card in hand

 

REMOVAL OF CONDITIONS

February 1, 2022 package sent

March 28, 2022 Fingerprints reused

July 18, 2023 approval

July 20, 2023 Card in hand

 

N400 

January 30,2023: Online filing

February 4th, 2023: Biometric appointment

June 15th, 2023: Case actively being reviewed

July 11th, 2023: Interview scheduled.

August 30th, 2023: Interview!

August 31st, 2023: Oath ceremony scheduled.

Sept 19th, 2023: Officially a US citizen!

 


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline

~~One post removed along with a reply. Please stick to helping the OP's case.~~

Edited by Ontarkie
Spoiler

Met Playing Everquest in 2005
Engaged 9-15-2006
K-1 & 4 K-2'S
Filed 05-09-07
Interview 03-12-08
Visa received 04-21-08
Entry 05-06-08
Married 06-21-08
AOS X5
Filed 07-08-08
Cards Received01-22-09
Roc X5
Filed 10-17-10
Cards Received02-22-11
Citizenship
Filed 10-17-11
Interview 01-12-12
Oath 06-29-12

Citizenship for older 2 boys

Filed 03/08/2014

NOA/fee waiver 03/19/2014

Biometrics 04/15/14

Interview 05/29/14

In line for Oath 06/20/14

Oath 09/19/2014 We are all done! All USC no more USCIS

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...