Jump to content
*FishF00D*

Bring a Lawyer to N400 Interview: Yes or No?

 Share

37 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline
1 hour ago, Ontarkie said:

Most of the threads I have seen on here where the marriage questions come in,  is usually when ROC and divorce happens so soon after approval or there were other red flags in the history. 

Being you filed ROC with the waiver your case is already more upfront. Nothing sneaky you're trying to get by them. 

 

Bring the lawyer if the fee won't hurt you and it gives you peace of mind. 

 

Precisely true; when I filed the ROC I included a very lengthy letter describing the course of our relationship - including my ex's eventual turn to drugs etc. so it's all on the table. So ready for all of this to be in my past!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Myanmar
Timeline
17 minutes ago, JeanneAdil said:

The lawyer can't stop USCIS from asking any  question

Tell it to my wife’s lawyer

 

In my own N-400 interview, the ISO started my English test. Me: “nope, it is after 5pm, you and I want to go home, and I am exempt.”

Edited by Mike E
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline
9 minutes ago, JeanneAdil said:

 The lawyer can't stop USCIS from asking any  question, and can't answer the questions for you. In fact, you'll find that the lawyer has to sit quietly through much of the interview.

 

The representative’s role is to ensure that the applicant’s legal rights are protected. A representative may advise his or her client on points of law but should not respond to questions the officer has directed to the applicant.

 

https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-12-part-b-chapter-3

 

I appreciate the POV and link to the policy manual. While a lawyer can't answer for an applicant or stop the IO from asking appropriate questions relating to the case at hand, they can intervene if an IO is asking a question that they aren't entitled to ask (per someone's personal experience in an earlier reply on this thread).

 

Additionally, I did consult with a lawyer before filing my ROC with divorce waiver (since it seemed complicated) and she described that without an lawyer present an IO can technically ask anything they want - so having someone else in the room who knows what's appropriate and what isn't will usually prevent an IO from going off-tangent. She also advised that if I were called to an interview for the ROC to definitely have a lawyer present given the traumatic nature of my divorce - but I was granted the 10yr-GC without interview so I didn't end up needing someone back then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
30 minutes ago, *FishF00D* said:

I wish I had the faith in myself required to be so level-headed and thoughtful in the moment! In situations like these I not great at asking someone in a position of power to stay within their respective boundaries - but it's a useful skill for someone who can!

The hardest thing to do is (as a U.S. Marine told me) to "keep head" under pressure.

26 minutes ago, *FishF00D* said:

it's all on the table

Then there should be no more questions, honestly.  See second reply below.

Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
12 minutes ago, *FishF00D* said:

she described that without an lawyer present an IO can technically ask anything they want - so having someone else in the room who knows what's appropriate and what isn't will usually prevent an IO from going off-tangent.

Like asking a barber if you need a haircut.  :P  Well, kinda.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
16 minutes ago, *FishF00D* said:

I was granted the 10yr-GC without interview

This is what suggests to me that you won't be grilled about your marriage.  If it were going to happen, it would have been at ROC time.  That was so long ago that it's water under the bridge by now.

Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline
1 hour ago, *FishF00D* said:

 

Precisely true; when I filed the ROC I included a very lengthy letter describing the course of our relationship - including my ex's eventual turn to drugs etc. so it's all on the table. So ready for all of this to be in my past!

I wish there was a hug reaction but I'll send you this virtual hug 🤗.

I really don't think  you need a lawyer. Of course a lawyer wants you to retain them. That is how they make money. Just do what will make you feel the most confident and comfortable. 

Spoiler

Met Playing Everquest in 2005
Engaged 9-15-2006
K-1 & 4 K-2'S
Filed 05-09-07
Interview 03-12-08
Visa received 04-21-08
Entry 05-06-08
Married 06-21-08
AOS X5
Filed 07-08-08
Cards Received01-22-09
Roc X5
Filed 10-17-10
Cards Received02-22-11
Citizenship
Filed 10-17-11
Interview 01-12-12
Oath 06-29-12

Citizenship for older 2 boys

Filed 03/08/2014

NOA/fee waiver 03/19/2014

Biometrics 04/15/14

Interview 05/29/14

In line for Oath 06/20/14

Oath 09/19/2014 We are all done! All USC no more USCIS

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline
1 hour ago, TBoneTX said:

Like asking a barber if you need a haircut.  :P  Well, kinda.

 In fairness, I have had the experience of an immigration officer at the border/customs asking me questions they "shouldn't" have about my immigration status while I was alone -- it was very uncomfortable and I thought I was obligated to answer anything they asked of me. I only found out after the fact that what they asked me was inappropriate, so having had that experience once already is part of what sways my perspective!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
45 minutes ago, *FishF00D* said:

I have had the experience of an immigration officer at the border/customs asking [...]

CBP agents are under indescribable pressure right now.  However, even at best, many of them are in foul humor and are looking to nail someone.  "Sir/ma'am, I would like for us to include your Port Director in this conversation."  :devil: 

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline
2 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

CBP agents are under indescribable pressure right now.  However, even at best, many of them are in foul humor and are looking to nail someone.  "Sir/ma'am, I would like for us to include your Port Director in this conversation."  :devil: 

 

Yeah this happened a few years ago (right before filing for ROC) - I guess they gotta keep it interesting for themselves hey! 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it helps you to feel any better, I got divorced about a month before I filed for citizenship and all I got asked during my N400 interview about it was to just confirm the date it was finalised. I didn't do a divorce waiver for my I-751 (that happened about five years ago when we were still married) but I was worried about scrutiny as well. I just thought it made more financial sense to go for citizenship rather than pay to change the name on my green card and then having to do citizenship later anyway. That was going to be my answer if pressed 🤣

ROC from CR-1 visa (Green Card expiration date was Nov 24th 2016)

 

Link to the evidence I submitted. Be sure to send evidence spanning your entire marriage (especially for K-1) or as far back as you can. Just one or two bank statements will not cut it. I primarily focused on the two years of living here since I came in on a CR-1. If you don't have the fundamentals (i.e. joint accounts/policies), you can explain why in the covering letter. E.g. "While we do not have joint utilities, we both contribute to them from our joint bank account".

 

September 26th 2016: I-751 package sent to CSC

September 28th 2016: Package delivered
September 30th 2016: Check cashed
October 3rd 2016: NOA1 received with receipt date of 09/28/16
November 3rd 2016: Biometrics received with appointment date of 11/14/16.
November 14th 2016: Attended biometrics appointment
October 30th 2017: Infopass appointment to get I-551 stamp
February 26th 2018: I-751 case number (aka the NOA1 receipt number) becomes trackable
March 14th 2018: Submitted service request due to being outside of processing time.

March 15th 2018: ROC approved. 535 days (1 year, 5 months and 17 days)

March 29th 2018: Card being produced

April 4th 2018: Card mailed out

April 6th 2018: Card in hand. Has incorrect "resident since" date. Submitted service request on I-751 case (typographical error on permanent resident card) and an I-90 online.

April 2018 - August 7th 2018: Tons of service requests, emails and now senator involvement to get my corrected green card back because what the heck, USCIS. Also some time in May I sent a letter to Potomac telling them I want to withdraw my I-90 since CSC were handling it.

August 8th 2018: Card in production thanks to the direct involvement of Senator Sherrod Brown's team

August 13th 2018: Card mailed

August 15th 2018: Card in hand with correct date. :joy:

October 31st 2018: Potomac sends out a notice stating they have closed out my I-90 per my request. Yay for no duplicate card drama.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline
On 7/18/2023 at 2:01 PM, TBoneTX said:

You can get away with it without having to pay an attorney.

Your having waited for 5 years should preclude questions about the marriage.

If you're asked, pleasantly reply, "I'm applying under the 5-year rule, under which marriage queries are precluded, sir."  Repeat as necessary.

The magic words are, "Let's please include your supervisor in this interview now, sir."  Repeat as necessary.

Practice in front of a mirror until you're comfortable with these responses.

 

Following up, I have decided to hire an attorney and we went over the details of my case yesterday in preparation for my interview that's scheduled for tomorrow.

 

He said that it's incredibly rare for ROC based on a divorce waiver to have been granted without interview (my case), and also confirmed that USCIS likes to take the N400 as an opportunity to review the GC application - so his perspective is that based on both factors it's more likely that they'll address the divorce than not.

Whether that means they simply ask to confirm, "Why did you get divorced?" vs. press for details I don't know -- but I'll be happy to have someone in the room with me either way!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, *FishF00D* said:

 

Following up, I have decided to hire an attorney and we went over the details of my case yesterday in preparation for my interview that's scheduled for tomorrow.

 

He said that it's incredibly rare for ROC based on a divorce waiver to have been granted without interview (my case), and also confirmed that USCIS likes to take the N400 as an opportunity to review the GC application - so his perspective is that based on both factors it's more likely that they'll address the divorce than not.

Whether that means they simply ask to confirm, "Why did you get divorced?" vs. press for details I don't know -- but I'll be happy to have someone in the room with me either way!

 

Your divorce waiver application must have been spotless and all thorough so USCIS granted your GC without an interview. Don't worry. I have a good feeling for you.

 

Just be honest as always - bring the attorney with you. Nothing wrong with that. Keep us posted!! Wishing you good luck tomorrow!!!! Keep your head up.

When tomorrow starts without me..

please try to understand, That an Angel came and called

my name, and took me by the hand; The angel said my

place was ready, In Heaven far above, And that I'd have

to leave behind all those I dearly love. But when I walked 

through Heaven's Gates, I felt so much at home, for God

looked down, smiled at me, And told me "Welcome Home."

So when tomorrow starts without me, 

Don't think we're far apart, for every time you think of me,

I'm right there in your heart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Argentina
Timeline
11 hours ago, *FishF00D* said:

He said that it's incredibly rare for ROC based on a divorce waiver to have been granted without interview (my case)

That’s not true. We’ve seen tons of divorce waivers being approved here without an interview. Of course the attorney will tell you that; they want people to hire them for something easy.

 

Regardless, good luck tomorrow. Do report back

FROM F1 TO AOS

October 17, 2019 AOS receipt date 

December 09, 2019: Biometric appointment

January 15, 2020 RFE received

January 30, 2020  RFE response sent

Feb 7: EAD approved and interview scheduled

March 18, 2020 Interview cancelled

April 14th 2020: RFE received

April 29, 2020 Approved without interview

May 1, 2020 Card in hand

 

REMOVAL OF CONDITIONS

February 1, 2022 package sent

March 28, 2022 Fingerprints reused

July 18, 2023 approval

July 20, 2023 Card in hand

 

N400 

January 30,2023: Online filing

February 4th, 2023: Biometric appointment

June 15th, 2023: Case actively being reviewed

July 11th, 2023: Interview scheduled.

August 30th, 2023: Interview!

August 31st, 2023: Oath ceremony scheduled.

Sept 19th, 2023: Officially a US citizen!

 


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...