Jump to content
Timona

Frivolous cases you've heard of

 Share

46 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Boiler said:

I have certainly seen Mexican cases, which seems odd as I have been to Mexico 3 times and they seem to have a fairly active scene.

For these, I would be like @Timona and resolve it in 10 minutes.  You say LGBTQ is persecuted in Mexico?  Please explain to me how Kenny and Armando lived there for several years publicly shown in 90-day fiancé and are alive and well.  LOL  Being disowned or threatened by family does not count as asylum. 😁

Walt Disney Animation GIF

November 2010 - Met/Just Friends

June 2017 - I caught feelings, you want to try this?  Yes.
June 2018 - Do you want to get married?  Yes.
November 2018 - K1 filed

May 2019 - K1 interview scheduled and packet sent to embassy

June 2019 - K1 interview, approved, and moved to USA

August 2019 - Married

September 2019 - AOS/EAD/AP filed

October 2019 - Biometrics Appointment

January 2020 - AOS RFE for birth certificate received and sent back

February 2020 - EAD/AP approved and got the card

October 2020 - EAD/AP renewal filed

November 2020 - EAD/AP renewal approved and got the card - AOS interview date issued

December 2020 - AOS interview, approved, and GC received

September 2022 - ROC filed
June 2024 - Biometrics Reused
July 2024 - Approved (NO INTERVIEW) and GC received.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Kenya
Timeline

@Fe.Ta and @Boiler Venezuelas are doing this LBGTQ game thing too. I know one who told me her friend claimed such and is in Chicago and she also wanted to go the same direction. I was like 😳

 

There's a lot of lesbians, gays etc in Latin America. You see them everyday and everywhere. So, it just boggles my mind when they obtain B-2 and as soon as they land in US, claim asylum from persecution. 

Immigration journey is not: fast, for the faint at heart, easy, cheap, for the impatient nor right away. If more than 50% of this applies to you, best get off the bus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline

I assume this is common in the US as well, but switching religions is quite popular, and then surprisingly switching back once the case is approved.

Edited by Boiler

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Georgia
Timeline
8 hours ago, Dashinka said:

Which is why IMO asylum cases should be treated like a B2 application.  Why does it have to go through a court system?  Why cannot it not be decided by an IO, or CBP officer with an assumption the claim is false (like B2 applicants are assumed to have immigration intent), and the petitioner responsible for the burden of proof.

B2 will never affect lives in the same way that true asylum cases are affected. You are comparing somebody's leisure time vs fighting for your life. I understand that only 1-2% of asylum cases are true but that is the difference. There has to be a better way.

Edited by kvito28
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline
17 minutes ago, kvito28 said:

B2 will never affect lives in the same way that true asylum cases are affected. You are comparing somebody's leisure time vs fighting for your life. I understand that only 1-2% of asylum cases are true but that is the difference. There has to be a better way.

How many are true depends on what definition you are using and who is deciding.

 

The whole concept is super vagie.

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Georgia
Timeline
12 minutes ago, Boiler said:

How many are true depends on what definition you are using and who is deciding.

 

The whole concept is super vagie.

One example of "true" would be political opression when someone fears of becoming a prisoner or being targeted... War is another example. If someone truly fears for their and their loved ones lives due to these circumstances then I consider those to be true asylum cases. I am sure there are many more I missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline
9 minutes ago, kvito28 said:

One example of "true" would be political opression when someone fears of becoming a prisoner or being targeted... War is another example. If someone truly fears for their and their loved ones lives due to these circumstances then I consider those to be true asylum cases. I am sure there are many more I missed.

That could be half the world.

 

I was in London when the IRA bombings were going on, would I have qualified.

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
14 minutes ago, kvito28 said:

One example of "true" would be political opression when someone fears of becoming a prisoner or being targeted... War is another example. If someone truly fears for their and their loved ones lives due to these circumstances then I consider those to be true asylum cases. I am sure there are many more I missed.

Certainly there are true asylum cases, but like with almost anything, people will take advantage of the system and so the numbers show the overwhelming majority are false.  This is why my idea to streamline the process and hopefully the USCIS/CBP/ICE Officer (no need for an IJ)can weed out the false claims and get to the real claims.  Instead you get a huge amount of people waiting in a massive line.

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Argentina
Timeline

I know many of you don’t like Hacking, but plenty of people that are on the verge of being deported come to the show and ask…

”can I file for asylum?” 
As if filing for asylum was as simple as going to the grocery store.

FROM F1 TO AOS

October 17, 2019 AOS receipt date 

December 09, 2019: Biometric appointment

January 15, 2020 RFE received

January 30, 2020  RFE response sent

Feb 7: EAD approved and interview scheduled

March 18, 2020 Interview cancelled

April 14th 2020: RFE received

April 29, 2020 Approved without interview

May 1, 2020 Card in hand

 

REMOVAL OF CONDITIONS

February 1, 2022 package sent

March 28, 2022 Fingerprints reused

July 18, 2023 approval

July 20, 2023 Card in hand

 

N400 

January 30,2023: Online filing

February 4th, 2023: Biometric appointment

June 15th, 2023: Case actively being reviewed

July 11th, 2023: Interview scheduled.

August 30th, 2023: Interview!

August 31st, 2023: Oath ceremony scheduled.

Sept 19th, 2023: Officially a US citizen!

 


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Dashinka said:

Certainly there are true asylum cases, but like with almost anything, people will take advantage of the system and so the numbers show the overwhelming majority are false.  This is why my idea to streamline the process and hopefully the USCIS/CBP/ICE Officer (no need for an IJ)can weed out the false claims and get to the real claims.  Instead you get a huge amount of people waiting in a massive line.

aren’t they doing this on the border right now with the app where people can book appointments to have the initial claim heard and they’re either turned away or let in? 

. . . Also, I’m sure @TBoneTX is going to come along soon and say we are waaaaaaaay off topic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
7 minutes ago, Redro said:

I’m sure @TBoneTX is going to come along soon and say we are waaaaaaaay off topic.

Gracias for your hat-tip toward my merciless -- nay, brutal -- moderation, but most of this discussion fits.

 

I was going to say:  if asylum requests were to be processed at the U.S. consulates in the respective countries, the consuls would get nothing but, and not only would they spend their time hire-to-retire handling only these, their lives might be in danger from disgruntled applicants (or from resentful gang/mob leaders who disagreed with approved asylum claims).

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Georgia
Timeline
21 minutes ago, Dashinka said:

Certainly there are true asylum cases, but like with almost anything, people will take advantage of the system and so the numbers show the overwhelming majority are false.  This is why my idea to streamline the process and hopefully the USCIS/CBP/ICE Officer (no need for an IJ)can weed out the false claims and get to the real claims.  Instead you get a huge amount of people waiting in a massive line.

It is clear that a better system is needed to handle asylum case reviews. As you know it has been a focus for many administrations, laws change but no optimal decision ever comes out of it. It is not easy..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Timona said:

@Fe.Ta and @Boiler Venezuelas are doing this LBGTQ game thing too. I know one who told me her friend claimed such and is in Chicago and she also wanted to go the same direction. I was like 😳

 

There's a lot of lesbians, gays etc in Latin America. You see them everyday and everywhere. So, it just boggles my mind when they obtain B-2 and as soon as they land in US, claim asylum from persecution. 

I can't speak for every single country in Latin America. But, where I come from (Puerto Rico), and other countries I have visited or know people from there, the discrimination is similar to whatever can be seen in the USA, except it is more like the USA circa 90s-early 00s and not the present.  However, I would not label it as worthy of seeking asylum over it.  This truth probably applies to about 85% of them and likely the other 15% has a mix of being persecuted or victims for other reasons (or plain random) and not specifically because of being part of LGBTQ.  I think it is just a loophole they found that works.

Likewise, I have heard of cases where tourist visa for family members can be approved "easier" if the person within USA claims health problems (especially mental).  I know someone close that did this in Canada.

Walt Disney Animation GIF

November 2010 - Met/Just Friends

June 2017 - I caught feelings, you want to try this?  Yes.
June 2018 - Do you want to get married?  Yes.
November 2018 - K1 filed

May 2019 - K1 interview scheduled and packet sent to embassy

June 2019 - K1 interview, approved, and moved to USA

August 2019 - Married

September 2019 - AOS/EAD/AP filed

October 2019 - Biometrics Appointment

January 2020 - AOS RFE for birth certificate received and sent back

February 2020 - EAD/AP approved and got the card

October 2020 - EAD/AP renewal filed

November 2020 - EAD/AP renewal approved and got the card - AOS interview date issued

December 2020 - AOS interview, approved, and GC received

September 2022 - ROC filed
June 2024 - Biometrics Reused
July 2024 - Approved (NO INTERVIEW) and GC received.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Kenya
Timeline

There was an OP here a few months back who was grasping at straws. She and her family were applying for anything and everything to remain in US. 

 

Her parents got robbed/ attacked while in US, at work and on B-2 visa, iirc, and just like that "They qualify for U-visa." First of all, why are they working on B-2? 

Immigration journey is not: fast, for the faint at heart, easy, cheap, for the impatient nor right away. If more than 50% of this applies to you, best get off the bus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...