Jump to content

17 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Myanmar
Timeline
3 minutes ago, Lorl said:

nope, adjust status here

In that case have you considered the filing a new I-130 as per the suggestion in 

?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline

The only ones I remember were from cases where a Divorce Waiver was a simpler and more logical route. 

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Myanmar
Timeline
35 minutes ago, Lorl said:

yes, but i am not going that way. I filed a hardship waiver. 

 

The hardship waiver seems harder. Some I-130 / I-485 cases have been filed when you could have filed last year and are now approved. 
 

31 minutes ago, Boiler said:

The only ones I remember were from cases where a Divorce Waiver was a simpler and more logical route. 

OP did try a divorce waiver and was denied. OP is married to spouse B today. OP divorced spouse A after getting a green card through spa use A.   USCIS concluded OP was in a relationship with spouse B before OP married spouse A. Hence I-751 was denied.  The divorce waiver option appears to be dead. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline

It appears the likely issue is proving up the legitimacy of the first marriage.

 

Well maybe better to say that is my assumption.

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Myanmar
Timeline

USCIS has already ruled on that point.  Based on what I read in the other thread, I think it is an even lower (than hardship waiver)  percentage play to appeal it to federal court. The high percentage play is as @mindthegap stated. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, immigrant2046 said:

hey, I read your other post, did USCIS conduct an investigation on your first marriage? did they reach out to your wife’s brother or did your wife’s brother volunteered information? 

They didn't reach out to her brother they reached out to her ex

 

again I am here to see if there is someone with previous experience with 751 hardship waiver

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Myanmar
Timeline
4 minutes ago, Lorl said:

They didn't reach out to her brother they reached out to her ex

 

again I am here to see if there is someone with previous experience with 751 hardship waiver

The resounding  absence of a “yes” would appear to be your answer. VJ is mostly a DIY site, and your case is not DIY. 
 

I’ve never seen a single immigration lawyer post here. Just a few non immigration lawyers who know no more and no less than we do. 
 

@Family might have seen such a case. 
 

Reddit’s immigration and USCIS sub-reddits have plenty of immigration lawyers who might respond especially if they think they can get your business. And some of those lawyers are  good. And some are  bad. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OP has an attorney as per prior posts. He is being pro active inasmuch as he waited close to a decade with a pending I-751 that was denied for lack of bonafides to his first marriage. ..so long that first wife passed away in 2018.

My limit is a hardship waiver where divorce was not even filed yet, sadly it was a slam dunk because the applicant was diagnosed with terminal illness and it was approved in 30 days or so.

 

OP’s attorney probably claimed the usual hardship ( emotional and psychological substantiated by therapist) , but it’s unlikely to prevail as USCIS seems to have dug in their heels…

 

I would say you are better off getting to court for a chance to argue the bonafides of that first marriage again in front of the judge. In your case an NTA is a good outcome to hope for,  to finally wrap this up. ..you stated you had extensive records and USCIS did a soft denial and won’t be able to prove fraud. 

 

And no he can’t just readjust through second marriage ( 3 kids and all)
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Myanmar
Timeline
4 minutes ago, Family said:

And no he can’t just readjust through second marriage ( 3 kids and all)

Why not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...