divorce

[babybunny 2]

Shon wrote;

Sorry about this.

Sponsor's still obligated 'til you remove condtions. Divorce doesn't change that. I waited 2 years for my obligation to be lifted off my ex. Thank God his behind got deported (failed to remove the condtions).

meauxna replied;

The I-864 wasn't discharged because he didn't remove conditions, (if he'd stayed illegal in the US, that would've done it), but because he left the US permanently (deported).

meauxna, shon tried to say exactly what you pointed out, although it doesn't come across that way on her post at first glance. Basically, that if her husband hadn't been deported, she would've had to wait two years before being able to lift her obligation towards him.

d,

Removing conditions from a married person's PR status does NOT kill the I-864. Neither does divorce.

Leaving the US permanently, becoming a citizen or dying does. Or earning enough quarters of work.

Her post states otherwise.

listion GIRL..

I have sponsered 2 persons..

one got deported. - obligation removed.

other became US citizen - obligation removed.

when I talked to the USICS . I was told

just because I got divorced form my ex dont mean the I-864 obligation is removed.

I waited 2 years for ex to get deported.

I dont know what you are saying ..but, I know what happend in my case.

I know what was said to me!

PS.. no one is talking about someone being married!! we are talking about someone Divorced.

Edited April 2, 2006 by shonjaved

[Flames9_RN 358]

Sorry to hear that Digi!! Hope all goes well. if that were to happen to me, I would be on the first train back to Canada with a Triple cream Timmys in my hand!! Best of luck

[meauxna 15]

listion GIRL...

gads, I get tired of your rants shon.

YOU wrote:

"sponsers still obligated til you remove condtions."

That is wrong. Period.

Now, off of digi's thread, and take it up with me in PM if you still have something to say about it.

[Peggy 1]

listion GIRL...

gads, I get tired of your rants shon.

YOU wrote:

"sponsers still obligated til you remove condtions."

That is wrong. Period.

Now, off of digi's thread, and take it up with me in PM if you still have something to say about it.

Well said

[denali_1963 0]

From what i heard you are obligated for 10 years even if you get divorced? Is this true? Unless they get deported if course. Is this true?

[Euro 3]

Hey Digi nice to hear from you, its been a while......................sorry to hear about the Divorce, but hey you have to be happy & if thats what it takes!!

[dmartmar 1]

gads, I get tired of your rants shon.

YOU wrote:

"sponsers still obligated til you remove condtions."

That is wrong. Period.

Now, off of digi's thread, and take it up with me in PM if you still have something to say about it.

Myself included; wouldn't it be great, less spiteful and offensive if everyone here on these forums discussed and/or resolved their own personal opinions and squabbles via PM, instead of taking it out in public for all to read? Is it really necessary to belittle, disprespect and talk down to people in replying posts, or worse yet, report people to the website's administrator so they can be banned permanently really necessary just b/c someone doesn't agree with another one's personal view(s), belief(s) or opinion(s) around a certain topic?

People here ask for advice concerning the legalities regarding immigration, as well as neutral and subjective opinion(s) regarding certain situations. Everyone's views on a certain topic have to be respected, not refuted or argued b/c that person might've interpreted a certain thing a certain way, as opposed to someone else's different view.

Remember we can only respond to what we read and perceive in our own, special way. Now, if we had the luck of looking at the person posting and judge his/her reactions and/or body language in person, it'd be a diferent story.

People see things differently, then formulate ideas and reach decisions based on both their personal experiences and self-interpretation of the facts. Nothing more, nothing less.

Edited April 3, 2006 by dmartmar

[babybunny 2]

listion GIRL...

gads, I get tired of your rants shon.

YOU wrote:

"sponsers still obligated til you remove condtions."

That is wrong. Period.

Now, off of digi's thread, and take it up with me in PM if you still have something to say about it.

kiss where I sit!

From what i heard you are obligated for 10 years even if you get divorced? Is this true? Unless they get deported if course. Is this true?

your only obligated til Mexuna sayes you are obligated. she is the ruling king richard

[denali_1963 0]

How about we take it after school in the parking lot. Hahahahahahahahahahaah I will bring the popcorn.

[babybunny 2]

How about we take it after school in the parking lot. Hahahahahahahahahahaah I will bring the popcorn.

gads, I get tired of your rants shon.

YOU wrote:

"sponsers still obligated til you remove condtions."

That is wrong. Period.

Now, off of digi's thread, and take it up with me in PM if you still have something to say about it.

Myself included; wouldn't it be great, less spiteful and offensive if everyone here on these forums discussed and/or resolved their own personal opinions and squabbles via PM, instead of taking it out in public for all to read? Is it really necessary to belittle, disprespect and talk down to people in replying posts, or worse yet, report people to the website's administrator so they can be banned permanently really necessary just b/c someone doesn't agree with another one's personal view(s), belief(s) or opinion(s) around a certain topic?

People here ask for advice concerning the legalities regarding immigration, as well as neutral and subjective opinion(s) regarding certain situations. Everyone's views on a certain topic have to be respected, not refuted or argued b/c that person might've interpreted a certain thing a certain way, as opposed to someone else's different view.

Remember we can only respond to what we read and perceive in our own, special way. Now, if we had the luck of looking at the person posting and judge his/her reactions and/or body language in person, it'd be a diferent story.

People see things differently, then formulate ideas and reach decisions based on both their personal experiences and self-interpretation of the facts. Nothing more, nothing less.

spot on!

[denali_1963 0]

Can't we all just play nice?

[RaspberrySwirl 20]

Digs, sorry to hear but hey dude, better sooner than later. Whatever makes you happy

And sorry that your thread has been polluted by the VJ troll who just won't take a hint. (Yes, I meant you shon, get over yourself).

Take care digs!

Edited April 3, 2006 by RaspberrySwirl

[denali_1963 0]

Digs, sorry to hear but hey dude, better sooner than later. Whatever makes you happy

And sorry that your thread has been polluted by the VJ troll who just won't take a hint. (Yes, I meant you shon, get over yourself).

Take care digs!

oh tisk tisk. We are all intitled to our own opinion. Especially if you air it on vj.

[RaspberrySwirl 20]

Digs, sorry to hear but hey dude, better sooner than later. Whatever makes you happy

And sorry that your thread has been polluted by the VJ troll who just won't take a hint. (Yes, I meant you shon, get over yourself).

Take care digs!

oh tisk tisk. We are all intitled to our own opinion. Especially if you air it on vj.

Exactly!

[diadromous mermaid 36]

gads, I get tired of your rants shon.

YOU wrote:

"sponsers still obligated til you remove condtions."

That is wrong. Period.

Now, off of digi's thread, and take it up with me in PM if you still have something to say about it.

Myself included; wouldn't it be great, less spiteful and offensive if everyone here on these forums discussed and/or resolved their own personal opinions and squabbles via PM, instead of taking it out in public for all to read? Is it really necessary to belittle, disprespect and talk down to people in replying posts, or worse yet, report people to the website's administrator so they can be banned permanently really necessary just b/c someone doesn't agree with another one's personal view(s), belief(s) or opinion(s) around a certain topic?

People here ask for advice concerning the legalities regarding immigration, as well as neutral and subjective opinion(s) regarding certain situations. Everyone's views on a certain topic have to be respected, not refuted or argued b/c that person might've interpreted a certain thing a certain way, as opposed to someone else's different view.

Remember we can only respond to what we read and perceive in our own, special way. Now, if we had the luck of looking at the person posting and judge his/her reactions and/or body language in person, it'd be a diferent story.

People see things differently, then formulate ideas and reach decisions based on both their personal experiences and self-interpretation of the facts. Nothing more, nothing less.

The problem here is that the regulations are not subject to personal interpretation. Meauxna was perfectly entitled and doing everyone a service to correct Shonjaved's post, otherwise, others could think mistakenly that when an alien removes conditions the sponsor's obligation is satisfied. That is not correct.

In the instant case, and I am speculating, because I don't know the details. If Shon's husband was deported, leaving the US permanently would relieve Shon of the sponsor obligation. Naturally, that would not occur until he left. On the other hand if the reason for his deportation order was related to fraud, reported by the USC spouse, and if status was either denied or subsequently rescinded due to such a finding and he did not take the matter further, once the window of opportunity to appeal a denial or rescission had elapsed and he was without status, I believe the sponsor is off the hook, whether the alien leaves the country or not.

Edited April 3, 2006 by diadromous mermaid