Jump to content

20 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey everyone, Happy New Year! Would love some advice based on your experience. Filed I-751 October 2021. The last half of 2022 has been crazy for the hubby and I, with becoming injured and almost losing our apartment. 
 

I haven’t file N-400 yet and my reasons are a bit twofold.
1. Things have been stressful and busy so haven’t had the time to gather docs

2.  I’ve been working as self employed for the last two years. We had to pay back a hell of a lot last year and this year because he’s been injured along with some other financial stuff, we were thinking of filing separate. 
 

So now I have a bit of time and I’m thinking if it makes sense to go ahead and file N-400. I feel like the processing time keeps increasing for I-751 and maybe it’s more realistic to go ahead and file for citizen. 
 

Now my concern is - would it be an issue for us with N-400, if we don’t file taxes together for 2022. We would provide both of our taxes if we decide to file separately and they need it or would it cause an issue with immigration. 

 

And second, has anyone filed N-400 with a I-751 pending since late 2021? And what has your processing time been so far with N-400? 
 

Would love some feedback so we can figure out our next step. Thanks 

Posted

Hey everyone, Happy New Year! 
 

I have a pending I-751 and I’m considering filing my N-400 but I had a question. Hubby and I filed our taxes joint for the last 3 years (2019, 2020, 2021), but for this current year (2022) we’re considering filing separately for financial reasons. Would that be an issue in our application. Everything else is joint from the time we got married but it’s only the taxes for the new year we might do separate.  
 

Would love some feedback! Thanks 

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Sweden
Timeline
Posted

No, won't be an issue. 

K-1: 12-22-2015 - 09-07-2016

AP: 12-20-2016 - 04-07-2017

EAD: 01-18-2017 - 05-30-2017

AOS: 12-20-2016 - 07-26-2017

ROC: 04-22-2019 - 04-22-2020
Naturalization: 05-01-2020 - 03-16-2021

U.S. passport: 03-30-2021 - 05-08-2021

En livstid i krig. Göteborg killed it. Epic:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBs3G1PvyfM&ab_channel=Sabaton

 

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Ghana
Timeline
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Greencard-22 said:

Hey everyone, Happy New Year! 
 

I have a pending I-751 and I’m considering filing my N-400 but I had a question. Hubby and I filed our taxes joint for the last 3 years (2019, 2020, 2021), but for this current year (2022) we’re considering filing separately for financial reasons. Would that be an issue in our application. Everything else is joint from the time we got married but it’s only the taxes for the new year we might do separate.  
 

Would love some feedback! Thanks 

Shouldn't be a problem. Just explain your reasons if it comes up at the interview.

Edited by nastra30
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted

I think your tax question has already been answered in your other thread, and I agree, this should not be an issue.  As to processing times for the N400, that is entirely up to workload at your local USCIS office, but it does seem that N400 applications are somewhat prioritized.

 

That being said, I would recommend filing as soon as possible.  Please read the instructions for the N400, the actual amount of required evidence to submit the application is fairly light, don't confuse the material requested to be brought to the interview as required evidence.  You do need this material for the interview, and you can upload that any time after submission or just wait and take it to the interview, but don't let it hold up your N400 submission.

 

Good Luck!

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Myanmar
Timeline
Posted
1 hour ago, Dashinka said:

does seem that N400 applications are somewhat prioritized.

Per 

https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/data/Quarterly_All_Forms_FY2022_Q4.pdf

 it definitely is getting priority. 

 

194,819 petitions filed in Q4 FY 2022. 323,793 petitions resolved, a difference of 128,974

 

 For entire FY2022, 769,989 petitions filed, 953,689 resolved, a difference of 183,700

 

So for first 3 quarters of FY2022, USCIS was averaging (953,689 - 323,793) / 3 = 209,965 resolved per quarter on average versus 323,793 petitions resolved.

 

By comparison, USCIS resolved 109,925 I-751s in FY2022, of which 24,011 were resolved in Q4. So in the first 3 quarters of FY2022, (109,925  - 24,011)/3 = 28,638 I-751s were resolved on average.

 

The conclusion is clear: In FY 2022, USCIS was speeding up N-400s and slowing down I-751s.

 

OP is in NYC. 

 

https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/data/N400_performancedata_fy2022_qtr4.pdf

 

6,230 + 1,447 = 7677 petitions were resolved. There a roughly 91 days in a quarter, so assuming no weekends, that is 7677  / 90 * 7 / 5 = 119 cases per day. Cases need to be interviewed so a resolve rate is going to be driven by an interview rate. I doubt NYC is doing much else besides N-400 interviews  these days.

 

As @Crazy Cat says, it's cheaper to file N-400 than to file a writ of mandamus for I-751.

 

At the rate USCIS is clearing the N-400 backlog, maybe we will see I-751 get more priority later in 2023. Or maybe we will see other cases get priority. The USA just added more countries to protected status / humanitarian relief lists.

 

When it was INS, Naturalization came second. Now that it is USCIS, Citizenship comes first, though N-600 case back log is getting no attention.

 

 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Taiwan
Timeline
Posted
3 hours ago, Greencard-22 said:

Hey everyone, Happy New Year! 
 

I have a pending I-751 and I’m considering filing my N-400 but I had a question. Hubby and I filed our taxes joint for the last 3 years (2019, 2020, 2021), but for this current year (2022) we’re considering filing separately for financial reasons. Would that be an issue in our application. Everything else is joint from the time we got married but it’s only the taxes for the new year we might do separate.  
 

Would love some feedback! Thanks 

Not an issue.  We filed separately one year.  The important thing is that you filed.

"The US immigration process requires a great deal of knowledge, planning, time, patience, and a significant amount of money.  It is quite a journey!"

- Some old child of the 50's & 60's on his laptop 

 

Senior Master Sergeant, US Air Force- Retired (after 20+ years)- Missile Systems Maintenance & Titan 2 ICBM Launch Crew Duty (200+ Alert tours)

Registered Nurse- Retired- I practiced in the areas of Labor & Delivery, Home Health, Adolescent Psych, & Adult Psych.

IT Professional- Retired- Web Site Design, Hardware Maintenance, Compound Pharmacy Software Trainer, On-site go live support, Database Manager, App Designer.

______________________________________

In summary, it took 13 months for approval of the CR-1.  It took 44 months for approval of the I-751.  It took 4 months for approval of the N-400.   It took 172 days from N-400 application to Oath Ceremony.   It took 6 weeks for Passport, then 7 additional weeks for return of wife's Naturalization Certificate.. 
 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ireland
Timeline
Posted

***** two threads on the same issue merged. *******

Bye: Penguin

Me: Irish/ Swiss citizen, and now naturalised US citizen. Husband: USC; twin babies born Feb 08 in Ireland and a daughter in Feb 2010 in Arkansas who are all joint Irish/ USC. Did DCF (IR1) in 6 weeks via the Dublin, Ireland embassy and now living in Arkansas.

mod penguin.jpg

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted
2 hours ago, Mike E said:

Per 

https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/data/Quarterly_All_Forms_FY2022_Q4.pdf

 it definitely is getting priority. 

 

194,819 petitions filed in Q4 FY 2022. 323,793 petitions resolved, a difference of 128,974

 

 For entire FY2022, 769,989 petitions filed, 953,689 resolved, a difference of 183,700

 

So for first 3 quarters of FY2022, USCIS was averaging (953,689 - 323,793) / 3 = 209,965 resolved per quarter on average versus 323,793 petitions resolved.

 

By comparison, USCIS resolved 109,925 I-751s in FY2022, of which 24,011 were resolved in Q4. So in the first 3 quarters of FY2022, (109,925  - 24,011)/3 = 28,638 I-751s were resolved on average.

 

The conclusion is clear: In FY 2022, USCIS was speeding up N-400s and slowing down I-751s.

 

OP is in NYC. 

 

https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/data/N400_performancedata_fy2022_qtr4.pdf

 

6,230 + 1,447 = 7677 petitions were resolved. There a roughly 91 days in a quarter, so assuming no weekends, that is 7677  / 90 * 7 / 5 = 119 cases per day. Cases need to be interviewed so a resolve rate is going to be driven by an interview rate. I doubt NYC is doing much else besides N-400 interviews  these days.

 

As @Crazy Cat says, it's cheaper to file N-400 than to file a writ of mandamus for I-751.

 

At the rate USCIS is clearing the N-400 backlog, maybe we will see I-751 get more priority later in 2023. Or maybe we will see other cases get priority. The USA just added more countries to protected status / humanitarian relief lists.

 

When it was INS, Naturalization came second. Now that it is USCIS, Citizenship comes first, though N-600 case back log is getting no attention.

 

 

USCIS started de-prioritizing the I751 back in late 2016 which is when we filed our I751.  Heck, back then they were only issuing 12 month extension letters, and many filers were getting cleared in less time than that, but after November/December 2016 the backlog started to grow.  We didn't really care since naturalization was the final goal, we looked at the I751 as a necessary evil (read as USCIS cash cow).  Back then, when my wife's N400 window opened, she filed about a month later and Detroit was very fast.  When they called her for her biometrics on the N400, she was also able to talk them into giving her an ADIT stamp since her extension letter was expiring in less than 6 weeks.  So much has changed, but in the end, my wife was applying for her US passport about the same time others that filed their I751 at the same time were just getting approved for their 10yr GC (my wife never actually received an actual 10yr GC since the I751 and N400 were approved at the same time).

 

It is good to see N400's being prioritized, but USCIS needs to balance things out more, and they have at least appeared to become less user friendly.

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: India
Timeline
Posted
2 hours ago, Mike E said:

 

 

When it was INS, Naturalization came second. Now that it is USCIS, Citizenship comes first, though N-600 case back log is getting no attention.

 

 

I say it has to do with how is at the helm... rulers make the rules and the underlings follow it.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Myanmar
Timeline
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, ImmigrantKrish said:

I say it has to do with how is at the helm... rulers make the rules and the underlings follow it.

My understanding from 

is that new ISOs start out on N-400s. This makes  sense as most of these cases are simple.   
 

I’ve several  problems with director Ur Mendoza Jaddou, and as she is someone with a background in agitating for DHS to reform its immigration policies, she has been a bitter disappointment.
 

However I will give credit where credit is due: since employee turnover at USCIS is high, and since the new hires are best deployed on N-400s, wiping out the N-400 backlog is a good change.  The  newbies will get broad exposure as they review immigration case files and approving citizenship is morale boosting. It wasn’t that long ago that N-400 cases were low priority.  
 

I also give her credit for:

 

* allowing parolees to file I-131a

* extending green cards by 24 months if people file N-400

 

These are modest and obvious changes.  I hope she has more creative ideas in store once the N-400 backlog zeroes out.   

Edited by Mike E
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: India
Timeline
Posted
9 minutes ago, Mike E said:

My understanding from 

is that new ISOs start out on N-400s. This ales sense as most of these cases are simple.   
 

I’ve several  problems with director Ur Mendoza Jaddou, and as she is someone with a background in agitating for DHS to reform its immigration policies, she has been a bitter disappointment.
 

However I will credit where credit is due: since employee turnover at USCIS is high, and since the new hires are best deployed on N-400s, wiping out the N-400 backlog is a good change.  The  newbies will get broad exposure as they review immigration case files and approving citizenship is morale boosting. 
 

I also give her credit for:

 

* allowing parolees to file I-131a

* extending green cards by 24 months if people file N-400

 

These are modest and obvious changes.  I hope she has more creative ideas in store once the N-400 backlog zeroes out.   

 

I agree that N-400 is almost a clear cut case, you qualify or you don't. There might be some fringe cases but burden is on the applicant to prove, so they can put newbies on these cases.

 

When I say the rulers put the rules, I mean the party that is ruling at present dictates where they want to put the money/energy into.

In general, Dems are pro-immigrants and hence you can almost sense they go with higher approvals and lower dillydallying  (thats my gut, not backed up with any stats, so please don't shoot me and I am open to data or stats to change my view).

 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Myanmar
Timeline
Posted
4 minutes ago, ImmigrantKrish said:

In general, Dems are pro-immigrants

If they are pro legal immigration they certainly have not performed any actions consonant with that.
 

Doubling fees (proposed) and increasing wait times for  legal immigration is the opposite pro-legal-immigration 
 

Pro illegal immigration: yes actions have been consonant. 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: India
Timeline
Posted
Just now, Mike E said:

If they are pro legal immigration they certainly have not performed any actions consonant with that.
 

Doubling fees (proposed) and increasing wait times for  legal immigration is the opposite pro-legal-immigration 
 

Pro illegal immigration: yes actions have been consonant. 

yep..their actions speak louder than words for sure....

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...