Case is stuck on "Case Is Ready To Be Scheduled For An Interview" since October 2021

[Token 9]

Hello, we applied for i-751 removal of conditions on december 2020 and till this date, we have no green card nor a interview date

Case is stuck on "Case Is Ready To Be Scheduled For An Interview" since october of 2021.

 

What is my next step as to the extension of 24 months is expiring soon as well.

Thanks for all your help!

[milimelo 4,465]

Did you file for N-400 already? 

 

You can also contact your congressman's (or senator's) immigration aide under help with federal government. 

[Token 9]

5 minutes ago, milimelo said:

Did you file for N-400 already? 

 

You can also contact your congressman's (or senator's) immigration aide under help with federal government. 

Thanks for you for the answer, we did file the n-400 already, still waiting on the interview dat as of now, biometrics where reused.

Edited December 5, 2022 by Token

[Rearviewmirror 397]

13 minutes ago, Token said:

Thanks for you for the answer, we did file the n-400 already, still waiting on the interview dat as of now, biometrics where reused.

If you fill out your Timeline this will help folks to provide more detailed answers

[MiraCante 2]

USCIS is a biased organization despite the fact that they claim the opposite. It is not legal/moral to process some applications in 2 3 months and others in years. Should be first come, first served, no matter how complex the situation is with some cases. If they delay the complex cases will this make the cases easier ? Not to mention about the country of birth of the applicants, that s another story too.

[RamonGomez 271]

1 hour ago, MiraCante said:

USCIS is a biased organization despite the fact that they claim the opposite. It is not legal/moral to process some applications in 2 3 months and others in years. Should be first come, first served, no matter how complex the situation is with some cases. If they delay the complex cases will this make the cases easier ? Not to mention about the country of birth of the applicants, that s another story too.

 

Seems like USCIS is making a push to clear out or prioritize "easy" cases. It makes the overall backlog numbers look much better (more approvals) though it screws a small minority with difficult cases.

 

 

[OldUser 6,480]

36 minutes ago, RamonGomez said:

 

Seems like USCIS is making a push to clear out or prioritize "easy" cases. It makes the overall backlog numbers look much better (more approvals) though it screws a small minority with difficult cases.

 

 

Agreed, this is what I am also thinking.

[Rearviewmirror 397]

41 minutes ago, RamonGomez said:

 

Seems like USCIS is making a push to clear out or prioritize "easy" cases. It makes the overall backlog numbers look much better (more approvals) though it screws a small minority with difficult cases.

 

 

I was wondering the same - and also if they'll go even deeper on that approach in FY22 to show fast progress for the new calendar year.

Also wonder how they determine "easy"

Edited December 5, 2022 by Rearviewmirror

[OldUser 6,480]

1 hour ago, Rearviewmirror said:

Also wonder how they determine "easy"

See the following examples. This is only my opinion.

 

Easy:

- USC and LPR were never married before

- LPR didn't have a long complex history in the US prior to marriage (F1 for many years, asylum, unlawful presence etc)

- A lot of strong evidence of bonafide marriage provided

 

Hard:

- Large age gap

- Couple had stokes interview for green card

- Divorce case

- Widow case

- LPR was out of status when filed I-485

- LPR committed a crime

- LPR had an asylum filed

- LPR or USC were married several times

- USC sponsored ex spouse for green card in the past

- USC got their citizenship through marriage to USC

- Little evidence of bonafide marriage provided

- Frequent address changes

- LPR entered without inspection

 

 

[MiraCante 2]

2 minutes ago, OldUser said:

See the following examples. This is only my opinion.

 

Easy:

- USC and LPR were never married before

- LPR didn't have a long complex history in the US prior to marriage (F1 for many years, asylum, unlawful presence etc)

- A lot of strong evidence of bonafide marriage provided

 

Hard:

- Large age gap

- Couple had stokes interview for green card

- Divorce case

- Widow case

- LPR was out of status when filed I-485

- LPR committed a crime

- LPR had an asylum filed

- LPR or USC were married several times

- USC sponsored ex spouse for green card in the past

- USC got their citizenship through marriage to USC

- Little evidence of bonafide marriage provided

- Frequent address changes

- LPR entered without inspection

 

 

The age difference should not be a problem. LPR passed the visa/GC interview. The widow scenarios is also not a problem.

 

[OldUser 6,480]

3 minutes ago, MiraCante said:

The age difference should not be a problem. LPR passed the visa/GC interview. The widow scenarios is also not a problem.

 

I'm not saying they're not going to be approved. Also as I said, it's only my subjective view. I'm also a believer I-751 and N-400 are chances for USCIS to review the entire immigration history of applicant. E.g. in my opinion it does't work on principle "we approved it before, then we should approve it now". My thinking is, the principle is: "we approved it before, did we make a mistake?" I'm thinking this, because there are multiple stages on the path to naturalization and they're often reviewed by different officers.

Again, do not quote me on this, this is only my opinion and I could be wrong.

[Rearviewmirror 397]

11 hours ago, OldUser said:

See the following examples. This is only my opinion.

 

Easy:

- USC and LPR were never married before

- LPR didn't have a long complex history in the US prior to marriage (F1 for many years, asylum, unlawful presence etc)

- A lot of strong evidence of bonafide marriage provided

 

 

Hopefully we are closer to simple, although I have had a mix of visas prior to Green Card (J1, F1, L1, H1B etc). I'd happily be selected for the new "risk based approach"!