E2 VIsa Clarity

[Boiler 45,770]

OP is not married

 

If OP was married and assuming he does not change his allegiance, it would not be to somebody from a Treaty Country

[jan22 3,056]

9 hours ago, SusieQQQ said:

So how do you interpret the quote from the OP?

 

 

I would first ask for the source of the quote, as I don't believe it is from neither the State Department nor USCIS to see the context from which it was quoted.  It is, possibly, a mis-interpretation, mis-statement, or mis-understanding of the provision that allows a spouse and minor children to be issued derivative E-visas even if they don't have the nationality of the principal applicant/business entity.

Edited October 31, 2022 by jan22

[TempunAlex 7]

On 10/31/2022 at 10:06 AM, jan22 said:

I would first ask for the source of the quote, as I don't believe it is from neither the State Department nor USCIS to see the context from which it was quoted.  It is, possibly, a mis-interpretation, mis-statement, or mis-understanding of the provision that allows a spouse and minor children to be issued derivative E-visas even if they don't have the nationality of the principal applicant/business entity.

Thank you for making this clear. 

 

Some of the rules written for quite a few laws regarding immigration can be a little complex and allow a margin for error in interpretation. I guess going down the E2 route is a no go. I'll just patiently wait for our turn to come up with the K1 and hope for the best.