Jump to content

2,951 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

On 11/21/2023 at 11:06 AM, ice-qube said:

Yeah, I was afraid of that, because there was a rush to do that at the time based on my observations on VJ, and so basically I was forced into doing it. If you go back in the record and read what I was saying, you will see I was very very hesitant to do it, but I felt there was no choice because this absurd situation had emerged. 

 

I haven't been caught up reading all this stuff. So is the govt actually taking a lot of the WOM cases to court now?

Yes, the DOS attorneys are issuing Motions to Dismiss more regularly. So far evidence suggests that they are issuing them more regularly if you filed a WOM within 6 months post interview. That being said it could be suggested that they will continue to issue them even if you file a WOM after 6 months post interview. Also seems that it can be pot luck whether you receive a Motion to Dismiss or not which makes the whole process that much more frustrating. Some peoples WOM's that are filed 90 days post interview are working and getting their Greencard over the line. But definitely MTD are becoming more of a trend. We will know more over the next few months where this trend goes but it definitely feels like the timeline for getting out of DS-5535 is being extended. 1/1.5 years even with a WOM might be ambitious at this point sadly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
11 minutes ago, Irish89 said:

Yes, the DOS attorneys are issuing Motions to Dismiss more regularly. So far evidence suggests that they are issuing them more regularly if you filed a WOM within 6 months post interview. That being said it could be suggested that they will continue to issue them even if you file a WOM after 6 months post interview. Also seems that it can be pot luck whether you receive a Motion to Dismiss or not which makes the whole process that much more frustrating. Some peoples WOM's that are filed 90 days post interview are working and getting their Greencard over the line. But definitely MTD are becoming more of a trend. We will know more over the next few months where this trend goes but it definitely feels like the timeline for getting out of DS-5535 is being extended. 1/1.5 years even with a WOM might be ambitious at this point sadly.

 

Does it mean those immigration visa applications  in DS-5535 / AP pool actually be soft rejected by DOS with such loooong time delay? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, northface said:

 

Does it mean those immigration visa applications  in DS-5535 / AP pool actually be soft rejected by DOS with such loooong time delay? 

Not sure I understand your question fully. I assume that by soft rejected you mean Motion to Dismiss? I think by and large the length of time since you've submitted DS-5535 is the deciding factor in whether you are issued a MTD. That being said, on a case by case basis the DOS attorney that ends up being assigned to your WOM case is a Human, meaning that one DOS attorney might see the length of time you've waited in DS-5535 and choose to push the DOS and consulate to make a final decision while another DOS attorney might fight it with MTD. There's essentially no rule book, seems to me that a large amount of the time they act intuitively when dealing with these WOM's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
7 hours ago, Irish89 said:

Not sure I understand your question fully. I assume that by soft rejected you mean Motion to Dismiss? I think by and large the length of time since you've submitted DS-5535 is the deciding factor in whether you are issued a MTD. That being said, on a case by case basis the DOS attorney that ends up being assigned to your WOM case is a Human, meaning that one DOS attorney might see the length of time you've waited in DS-5535 and choose to push the DOS and consulate to make a final decision while another DOS attorney might fight it with MTD. There's essentially no rule book, seems to me that a large amount of the time they act intuitively when dealing with these WOM's.

 

Thanks @Irish89 good input, " soft" rejection I mean they  put off making decision till you give up, due to time and money. DOS attorney argued that Congress doesn't specify the length of DS-5535 / AP process time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
On 11/23/2023 at 9:03 AM, Gha said:

Hi 

total silence .any update @APRIL2023 @ak47 @Fayisa @Dana.L

thank you 

 

No recent updates since Oct 6. Didn’t get a response either with my email inquires. I seek legal counsel from Goldstein back in august regard filing a ROM, but have decided against it at the time. The firm did acknowledge the increasing incidents of MTD and they are changing their approach to avoid it.  They also would push back if encounter a MTD, but weren’t specific about additional fees.  They only say: “Depending on what we need to do next, you might be required to pay a filing fee. That being said, more cases are delayed and immigration is extremely backlogged and the processing times are constantly changing. Immigration is requesting more time to work on processing cases. Therefore we needed to change our approach to avoid our cases getting dismissed and have changed our waiting period for filing. We now wait longer before filing.”

 

I debated on submitting an online feedback regarding ds5535 but didn’t end up doing so. USCIS is probably the ones of the top immigration entity, if not best, in the world. The DS5535 is strategically woven into this part of work flow for a reason. There’s a lack of tracking metrics and transparency to AP wait time for a reason. How much would public input really influence their processes? I guess it wouldn’t hurt to try. 
 

After being in this process for close to 8 months now, I am beyond jaded. With everything happening around the world, I can only imagine that resources are diverted to address immigration issues for American trying to repatriate back to the states, or even fast tracking petition status for those in life and death situation. Doesn’t help with the frequent threats to government shut down and the upcoming election. 
 

This forum is a nice place to vent, at least someone is hearing you out. Thank you for listening guys. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline

Does anyone actually know what they are required to do on their end once we send them our DS5535?

 

I.E. when we send then our 15 year travel/work,etc. history,are they having to contact every single country and place we went to/worked at/lived in?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Canucklehead said:

Does anyone actually know what they are required to do on their end once we send them our DS5535?

 

I.E. when we send then our 15 year travel/work,etc. history,are they having to contact every single country and place we went to/worked at/lived in?

I believe multiple agencies such as Homeland Security, the Department of State, and the FBI conduct background checks. Unfortunately, the timelines for processing our information are unclear, leaving us uncertain about how long these checks will take.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
49 minutes ago, Canucklehead said:

Does anyone actually know what they are required to do on their end once we send them our DS5535?

 

I.E. when we send then our 15 year travel/work,etc. history,are they having to contact every single country and place we went to/worked at/lived in?

https://www.regulations.gov/document/DOS-2023-0028-0001

 

You might look the above link on the ds5535 process or  page 168 of this thread. And find some clues. 

 

BTW

DOS wants more budget from Congress to do DS5535, asked for public comments, actually they got near 800 feedbacks. 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Canucklehead said:

Does anyone actually know what they are required to do on their end once we send them our DS5535?

 

I.E. when we send then our 15 year travel/work,etc. history,are they having to contact every single country and place we went to/worked at/lived in?

You may look at the following link

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_Advisory_Opinion

Edited by Leo The Great
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

More than half a dozen posts discussing the L-2 visa have been removed.  This thread is to discuss Montreal only.  There are other places on this site to discuss the L-2, et al.  Anyone who breathes another word about L-2 in this thread should be reported so that harsh administrative action can be applied.

 

VJ Moderation

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...