Jump to content

59 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, powerpuff said:

@Villanelle is correct, if you look at I-824 instructions it indicates several reasons one would file and yes, your falls under #5 on that list. 
 

We often see very poor advice coming from attorneys here. If they don’t know basic information like that (that I-824 is not just for lost notices), I would certainly not retain them.

Yess, I’m now showing him this forum. This is really helpful. Thank you so much😊 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 7/13/2022 at 4:41 AM, powerpuff said:

Good luck and don’t hesitate to ask more questions as they come 

Hi! Thanks for your help last time. Turns out my husband haven't sent the form i-824. He'e gonna mail it tommorow but we noticed this part? Can you please check if we have filed up the correct part and reason? We have a 3 yr old daughter so put her her on the dependent. But we didn't notice the "If you selected Part 2., Item Number 1.c., provide the  following information about the dependents for whom you are  requesting follow-to-join benefits" We Chose the Item number 1.d for part 2.  hanks so much!
image.png.e3f211197d88465695d50c3464f6fde1.pngimage.png.d624ac5b81bbe125c0a97d1c799c0163.png
 

Edited by anna galacs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That looks correct to me.

 

Just a note, it is best if your husband does not naturalize while you’re still in the process. When green card holders petition for their spouse, as you can see, there is an option to have a derivative on your application (your child) that will be joining you. If he becomes a US citizen, that no longer is the case. He will have file a new I-130 petition for the child from the beginning. Just an FYI 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, powerpuff said:

That looks correct to me.

 

Just a note, it is best if your husband does not naturalize while you’re still in the process. When green card holders petition for their spouse, as you can see, there is an option to have a derivative on your application (your child) that will be joining you. If he becomes a US citizen, that no longer is the case. He will have file a new I-130 petition for the child from the beginning. Just an FYI 

Oh I see. Thanks for this but as of now he has no plans to change his citizenship. By the way, do we still need to fill out the "dependent" part even though we chose the Part 2., Item Number 1.d? Hopefully we won't make mistakes this time.

image.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/23/2022 at 10:39 PM, powerpuff said:

That looks correct to me.

 

Just a note, it is best if your husband does not naturalize while you’re still in the process. When green card holders petition for their spouse, as you can see, there is an option to have a derivative on your application (your child) that will be joining you. If he becomes a US citizen, that no longer is the case. He will have file a new I-130 petition for the child from the beginning. Just an FYI 

Hi again! We decided to  leave the part 3, dependents part, blank since it should be filled up when you choose the reason 1.c. Is it okay if we don’t fill up our daughter’s name in here? Does she automatically come under my name? Thanks so much! 

Edited by anna galacs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, it does seem that that section only applies if you checked reason 1c. Regarding the part about automatically being included under your name I’m not sure about since I have never completed this form. As far as I know, derivatives are included when you complete Ds-260 at the NVC stage, that’s when you inform them that you have a derivative (your child in this case).

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, powerpuff said:

Yes, it does seem that that section only applies if you checked reason 1c. Regarding the part about automatically being included under your name I’m not sure about since I have never completed this form. As far as I know, derivatives are included when you complete Ds-260 at the NVC stage, that’s when you inform them that you have a derivative (your child in this case).

Thank you!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, F2bpinas said:

Any updates on F2B Philippines? Seems Visa Bulletin  for August 22 has no movement. Still stuck at

OCT 22, 2011. My brother was DQd 5 months ago. 
 

My mom a green card holder petitioned him back in Sept 2012. 

Thanks

Hi! Apologies but I don't know anything about it. We're still in the early stages so I'm still also confused on what to do, forms and other technical terms. 

 

Maybe you can also try to ask in other bulletins. Goodluck :)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, anna galacs said:

Hi again! We decided to  leave the part 3, dependents part, blank since it should be filled up when you choose the reason 1.c. Is it okay if we don’t fill up our daughter’s name in here? Does she automatically come under my name? Thanks so much! 

You made the right choice

 

Part 1.    1.d ( send to NVC


Part 2.     dependents is blank or not applicable ,

so no need to list your daughter ( NVC gets the I-130 and sees your child as derivative, she will show up in the CEAC site once NVC gets the case, creates a case number and e-mails instructions on how to log in) 

 

Part 3. is about you the principal , receipt number and dates. 
 

Just a quick question, in part 1 as applicant on I-824 is husband listed and marked as “ petitioner “ 

 

 

 

Edited by Family
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Family said:

You made the right choice

 

Part 1.    1.d ( send to NVC


Part 2.     dependents is blank or not applicable ,

so no need to list your daughter ( NVC gets the I-130 and sees your child as derivative, she will show up in the CEAC site once NVC gets the case, creates a case number and e-mails instructions on how to log in) 

 

Part 3. is about you the principal , receipt number and dates. 
 

Just a quick question, in part 1 as applicant on I-824 is husband listed and marked as “ petitioner “ 

 

 

 

Hi! Thanks so much!! Yes, he marked the "petitioner" in Part 1 :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...