Newly married and already issues

[Redro 4,611]

3 minutes ago, Commish10 said:

What is WAWA?

VAWA= violence against women act. 

It allows men and women who were abused (physically or mentally) by a USC or LPR spouse to self petition... 

So, they get LPR status without a sponsor. 

Edited May 23, 2022 by ROK2USA

[RO_AH 1,659]

6 hours ago, Crazy Cat said:

A Green Card holder is required, by law, to carry it. 

"Failing to have your green card with you is a misdemeanor and if you are found guilty you can be fined up to $100 and put in jail for up to 30 days."

https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/do-i-really-need-carry-green-card-me.html

You are also required by law to drive the speed limit or face fine and and or jail time. I'm sure everyone follows that one.

[RO_AH 1,659]

9 hours ago, MarJhi said:

Who said he needs to bring it to her? Can't that exchange be made through a third party? That would make more than "zero sense" right?

You are splitting hairs or what I said if she needs or wants it she will contact him and they can make arrangements or that he should reach out to her to get it to her. We can agree to disagree on that .

[MarJhi 963]

32 minutes ago, RO_AH said:

You are splitting hairs or what I said if she needs or wants it she will contact him and they can make arrangements or that he should reach out to her to get it to her. We can agree to disagree on that .

I am in 100% agreement with that last sentence.

[Mike E 11,741]

7 hours ago, MarJhi said:

Maybe talking to her in a public setting would be better. If there is a domestic violence issue, whether it goes one way or both ways, I don't think she should go back into that house.

Meeting at home is for a couple that wants to reconcile. If that’s not possible  then that’s fine. He can just file for divorce then. 
 

Meeting in public just creates more potential false witnesses for the orchestrated and calculated smear campaign against OP.  

7 hours ago, MarJhi said:

 

I have no problem with phone calls. 

My problem with phone calls is that they can be recorded. OP needs to stop creating paper and electronic  trails that cause himself trouble. 

[MarJhi 963]

1 hour ago, Mike E said:

Meeting in public just creates more potential false witnesses for the orchestrated and calculated smear campaign against OP.

I think if you are worried about false accusations you would definitely want to meet in a public space where there would be plenty of people around. It would be difficult to say someone did something in a space full of people and nobody witnessed it. If it was just the man and woman alone, that's where she could make an accusation, bruise herself up or whatever she wanted to do, especially after he already admitted to hitting her previously. 

 

She isn't going to get a crowd of people she doesn't know in a public space to be false witnesses against her husband.

[Ellie_7 103]

Yes, meeting in public holds too many pitfalls. Even if there would be no one planted deliberately, how many videos are out there on the Internet from situations in a public place where an onlooker started filming or recording something? And texts and phone calls definitely create paper trails.

[B_J 2,752]

1 hour ago, Ellie_7 said:

Yes, meeting in public holds too many pitfalls. Even if there would be no one planted deliberately, how many videos are out there on the Internet from situations in a public place where an onlooker started filming or recording something? And texts and phone calls definitely create paper trails.

If someone is accused of being violent (and they're not), then meeting in public is safer for them.  Let somebody record.  That will be proof that no violence has occurred.  Meeting in private allows for false claims of violence to be made with no proof otherwise.

 

Now, if the person is actually violent, then a public meeting does not work in their favor.