Jump to content
Kim Oppn

Utah Online marriage DV visas - LGBTQ

By Kim Oppn in Diversity Lottery Visas

 Share

21 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Kim Oppn Newbie

Kim Oppn   5

Posted
Filed: Other Country: Thailand
 Timeline
  • Author
Posted

Thank you for all comment sharing!

At primary, I'm trying to study rule and law for this online marriage scenario first. Travelling to another county is in choice but it take long time to get visa and require visa condition. 

Of course I worry about two foreigners marriage in USA that aaron2020 mention. 

 

As I read  USCIS Policy manual. https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-12-part-g-chapter-2 . 

I have 2-3 doubts

1. Utah county will be considered to be place-of-celebration by law right?

2. Do Utah online marriage recognized consummated by Utah law?

I stuck with 'celebrate' and 'consummated' this 2 word.😥

 

Please help to share you opinion. If can give reference would be pleased.

image.thumb.png.b07212a50f1d6ec151c14337523f14da.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Family Mentor

Family   3,988

Posted
Timeline
Posted

The link I sent you is from FAM ( Foreign Affairs Manual) and that is what you should refer to because you are dealing with DOS ( Department of State ) and Consulate, thus not USCIS. 
 

To simplify, UTAH allows marriage by proxy and therefore the zoom . Because you and your partner will be physically together at the time of zoom marriage , then you will have satisfied the “ consummated “ requirement. 
Consummated = sexual relation between married partners…but for Immigration purposes you only prove that you have been “ in the physical presence “ of each other, no sexy photos Lol! 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 1 year later...
  • Popular Post
Kim Oppn Newbie

Kim Oppn   5

Posted
Filed: Other Country: Thailand
 Timeline
  • Author
  • Popular Post
Posted (edited)

I come to tell the result. It can work! I'm so excited to start living with my couple. 🥰

Thanks for all comment from you guys.
Edited by Kim Oppn
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mike E Grand Master

Mike E   11,739

Posted
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Myanmar
 Timeline
Posted (edited)
On 5/14/2022 at 7:54 PM, AnnaCa said:

However, a republican candidate is (most likely) taking office in January, he is against the concept and wants it discontinued  https://davidsonclerk.com/?fbclid=IwAR2mXWNKAbO3_LqjoPiNiFQXfNgdl0cvBXctHpdwm7GQ9wZJXbFvq3e1apk  (see the Against Universal Marriage Licenses For All tab).

That candidate appears to have won the office and has yet to require remote appearance couples to come to Utah to get married.

 

 

Edited by Mike E
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 7 months later...
TBoneTX Grand Master

TBoneTX   45,273

Posted
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
 Timeline
Posted

The OP hasn't logged on to VisaJourney since fall 2023.

Thread from 2022 is now closed to further comment.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...