Jump to content

92 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: F-3 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted
Just now, Mike E said:

Interesting.  So it’s either combination something to with your country of origin, your DS-160 and I-130, or misunderstanding about your ability to adjust status on an F3 category.  A B-1/B-2 visa appointment would get closure. 

I am waiting for my F3 Visa interview; will check with the lawyer to see what is the best approach.

Thanks,

Just now, Mike E said:

Interesting.  So it’s either combination something to with your country of origin, your DS-160 and I-130, or misunderstanding about your ability to adjust status on an F3 category.  A B-1/B-2 visa appointment would get closure. 

 

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted
4 minutes ago, Mike E said:

Interesting.  So it’s either combination something to with your country of origin, your DS-160 and I-130, or misunderstanding about your ability to adjust status on an F3 category.  A B-1/B-2 visa appointment would get closure. 

I feel like if it was something to due with adjusting status he will at least get a chance to be interviewed by the CBP officer and get asked about ties etc. He was not even allowed to processed to that 

Filed: F-3 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted
26 minutes ago, Canada21 said:

I feel like if it was something to due with adjusting status he will at least get a chance to be interviewed by the CBP officer and get asked about ties etc. He was not even allowed to processed to that 

That's what I am thinking too.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Myanmar
Timeline
Posted
1 hour ago, Canada21 said:

I feel like if it was something to due with adjusting status he will at least get a chance to be interviewed by the CBP officer and get asked about ties etc. He was not even allowed to processed to that 

Not if the evidence was conclusive.  

44 minutes ago, Alfiatkinz said:

That's what I am thinking too.

Have you visited Iran since immigrating to Canada?

Posted (edited)

Pretty obvious to me why entry was denied. Final action date for F3 has been stuck at Nov 2008 for months and even when it moves to December (OP’s PD) there is a massive backlog for interviews. By contrast, table B dates for filing (F3 current to AUg09)is able to be used for adjustment of status which means that OP would be eligible to file for adjustment of status as soon as he entered the US. Looks like they saw huge risk of OP cutting the line to adjust vs waiting many many months still for a visa interview. Hardly seems fair when you look at all the other people on VJ who get to the buck the system and doesn’t sound like that is what OP had planned anyway, but he is paying for others who abuse tourist entry to cut the line.

Edited by SusieQQQ
Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted
4 minutes ago, SusieQQQ said:

Pretty obvious to me why entry was denied. Final action date for F3 has been stuck at Nov 2008 for months and even when it moves to December (OP’s PD) there is a massive backlog for interviews. By contrast, table B dates for filing (F3 current to AUg09)is able to be used for adjustment of status which means that OP would be eligible to file for adjustment of status as soon as he entered the US. Looks like they saw huge risk of OP cutting the line to adjust vs waiting many many months still for a visa interview. Hardly seems fair when you look at all the other people on VJ who get to the buck the system and doesn’t sound like that is what OP had planned anyway, but he is paying for others who abuse tourist entry to cut the line.

But here is my question. There are many Canadian citizens who visit daily while waiting their I-130 to process. Also he never made it to the CBP officers to check his intentions and ties. That is the point that I wonder about

Posted
1 minute ago, Canada21 said:

But here is my question. There are many Canadian citizens who visit daily while waiting their I-130 to process. Also he never made it to the CBP officers to check his intentions and ties. That is the point that I wonder about

He is not “waiting for his i130 to process”. He is able to adjust status as soon as he sets foot in the US as his PD is current for adjustment (even if not for a visa interview outside the US yet). Totally different context.

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline
Posted

I doubt that DoS does that sort of joined up thinking

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted
Just now, SusieQQQ said:

He is not “waiting for his i130 to process”. He is able to adjust status as soon as he sets foot in the US as his PD is current for adjustment (even if not for a visa interview outside the US yet). Totally different context.

Why are not spouses dealt the same way then and returned back outright and found inadmissible? They are still allowed to visit despite being able to adjust as long as they satisfy the CBP they are not planning to do so. Am I missing something?

Filed: F-3 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted
1 hour ago, Canada21 said:

But here is my question. There are many Canadian citizens who visit daily while waiting their I-130 to process. Also he never made it to the CBP officers to check his intentions and ties. That is the point that I wonder about

That's my point ! i didn't even had a chance to talk to the officer; how he assessed my ties to Canada are weak enough to not come back?

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Taiwan
Timeline
Posted
1 minute ago, Alfiatkinz said:

That's my point ! i didn't even had a chance to talk to the officer; how he assessed my ties to Canada are weak enough to not come back?

I think there is something else going on.....You and we just haven't figured it out yet. 

"The US immigration process requires a great deal of knowledge, planning, time, patience, and a significant amount of money.  It is quite a journey!"

- Some old child of the 50's & 60's on his laptop 

 

Senior Master Sergeant, US Air Force- Retired (after 20+ years)- Missile Systems Maintenance & Titan 2 ICBM Launch Crew Duty (200+ Alert tours)

Registered Nurse- Retired- I practiced in the areas of Labor & Delivery, Home Health, Adolescent Psych, & Adult Psych.

IT Professional- Retired- Web Site Design, Hardware Maintenance, Compound Pharmacy Software Trainer, On-site go live support, Database Manager, App Designer.

______________________________________

In summary, it took 13 months for approval of the CR-1.  It took 44 months for approval of the I-751.  It took 4 months for approval of the N-400.   It took 172 days from N-400 application to Oath Ceremony.   It took 6 weeks for Passport, then 7 additional weeks for return of wife's Naturalization Certificate.. 
 

Posted
1 hour ago, Alfiatkinz said:

I agree

So, have you contacted the embassy as advised? Given that you say you have traveled many times before it’s almost certainly not a security issue related to being from Iran,  and no, they don’t give everyone a chance to explain themselves in a interview. 
 

 

5 hours ago, Alfiatkinz said:

I did, couple of times but not since 2018

And you weren’t able to adjust then, but you are now. In any case if you find out the reason from the embassy, do let us know.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Myanmar
Timeline
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, SusieQQQ said:

 Looks like they saw huge risk of OP cutting the line to adjust vs waiting many many months still for a visa interview. Hardly seems fair when you look at all the other people on VJ who get to the buck the system and doesn’t sound like that is what OP had planned anyway, but he is paying for others who abuse tourist entry to cut the line.

If I am  DQed and just waiting  on a consular interview, am I going to

 

A- visit and adjust status, wait 1-2 years for that to play  out, and   wait at least a year for EAD and AP or

 

B-  wait for my consular interview, where I get a visa that once used gives me LPR status
 

?

 

I would do B.  

 

You might be right, and if you are right, the explanation  isn’t logical. 

Edited by Mike E
 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...