Jump to content

2,967 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted

@sandranj May you please answer my earlier question.

On 6/14/2022 at 8:42 AM, Royal Seed said:

Hi @sandranj

I was never on removal proceeding and I renewed my C09 employment authorization twice in 2019 without any issue. I only got a notice of administrative closure for i-130 after the interview when i told the office i will be submitting i-360 and when I received a receipt notice, a copy was taken to her at the local office. Could this be a mistake from USCIS? Please, I need your assistance.

@sandranj I was never on removal proceeding and I renewed my C09 employment authorization twice in 2019 without any issue. I only got a notice of administrative closure for i-130 after the interview in 2018 when i told the officer I would be submitting i-360 and when I received a receipt notice, a copy was taken to her at the local office. Could this be a mistake from USCIS? Please, I need your assistance.

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, sandranj said:

Although you are entitled to your opinion, I disagree. As one of the United Nations' attorneys, I deal daily with cases and reports of domestic violence, and we are committed to finding ways to assist refugees and asylum seekers throughout the process. In addition, the mantra that private violence cannot be considered a form of persecution has been established by the U.N., not by me, and it has been used for quite some time by the BIA.You asked" if you ever sit down and actually read this stuff". I have been doing and reading  this for just 33 years.

I would like some receipts. These will generally start with "Matter of ..." or end with "... v. Attorney General".

Edited by Demise

Contradictions without citations only make you look dumb.

Filed: Timeline
Posted
14 minutes ago, Demise said:

Just a person that reads, so my request for a citation to the counterclaim shouldn't be too difficult.

With all due respect Sandra is not here to take 'requests'. I mean you do realize Sandra has a full time job in addition to the massive time she spends doing pro bono work, as well as using her time to post on here? If you want to debate laws or case strategies reach out to your local law school to find out how to enroll. I believe you would make an excellent attorney or advocate.

 

 

Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, Villanelle said:

With all due respect Sandra is not here to take 'requests'. I mean you do realize Sandra has a full time job in addition to the massive time she spends doing pro bono work, as well as using her time to post on here? If you want to debate laws or case strategies reach out to your local law school to find out how to enroll. I believe you would make an excellent attorney or advocate.

I thought about it but I do enjoy being a software developer. Maybe I'll give it a shot once I get bored of this field, I'm right next door to Wisconsin for that easy diploma privilege.

 

Also, with all due respect, if you respond with a contradiction to my post I would like to see the reasoning behind it that I can reference. I am very much open to the fact that I might be wrong. I've had arguments on this and other sites that concluded with "Yeah, I was wrong, you are absolutely right" (like one regarding how do re-entry bars actually work when you come back to US, or one where I wrongly thought that K-2s age out from AOS upon turning 21 where someone corrected me with a BIA precedent that they don't) and a whole bunch of others where I just never heard anything back.

 

If two opposing answers are given to a single question one of them has to be wrong, and if it's mine I'll happily retract it, but well I don't think I'm wrong, at least not in the current circumstances.

Edited by Demise

Contradictions without citations only make you look dumb.

Filed: Timeline
Posted
6 minutes ago, Demise said:

I thought about it but I do enjoy being a software developer. Maybe I'll give it a shot once I get bored of this field, I'm right next door to Wisconsin for that easy diploma privilege.

 

Also, with all due respect, if you respond with a contradiction to my post I would like to see the reasoning behind it that I can reference. I am very much open to the fact that I might be wrong. I've had arguments on this and other sites that concluded with "Yeah, I was wrong, you are absolutely right" (like one regarding how do re-entry bars actually work when you come back to US, or one where I wrongly thought that K-2s age out from AOS upon turning 21 where someone corrected me with a BIA precedent that they don't) and a whole bunch of others where I just never heard anything back.

I totally understand. And it's great to see people on here who are both eager and open to learn. But Sandra typically doesn't have the time to be doing so, hence you may just have to accept she knows what she's talking about (because she 100% does and is one of the only users here who should blindly be trusted to be accurate) and need to do your own research on it further as you graciously have been pointed in the right direction by her. 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Villanelle said:

I totally understand. And it's great to see people on here who are both eager and open to learn. But Sandra typically doesn't have the time to be doing so, hence you may just have to accept she knows what she's talking about (because she 100% does and is one of the only users here who should blindly be trusted to be accurate) and need to do your own research on it further as you graciously have been pointed in the right direction by her. 

Yeah I did, and I found citations that contradict her claims of can't use private violence, DV isn't enough. I found ones that say that private violence works if the government is unwilling or unable to stop it, and two that dressed DV into membership in particular social group.

Now when on one hand I have Sandra's unsourced claim, and on the other hand I have BIA decisions, I am really leaning very hard to what the BIA has to say. Idk, maybe there is some Supreme Court decision I really need to hear about that Google can't find.

 

You want to maybe take this to private messages, I'm a bit tired of going offtopic on this thread.

Contradictions without citations only make you look dumb.

Posted (edited)
47 minutes ago, Demise said:

Yeah I did, and I found citations that contradict her claims of can't use private violence, DV isn't enough. I found ones that say that private violence works if the government is unwilling or unable to stop it, and two that dressed DV into membership in particular social group.

Now when on one hand I have Sandra's unsourced claim, and on the other hand I have BIA decisions, I am really leaning very hard to what the BIA has to say. Idk, maybe there is some Supreme Court decision I really need to hear about that Google can't find.

 

You want to maybe take this to private messages, I'm a bit tired of going offtopic on this thread.

Yeah you are right. 

It's a little bit off topic and should be taken to private messages. 

We thank both of you @Demise and most specially @sandranj for your great help on this thread. 

Many peoples can regain their smile because of your untimely effort in providing answers to people's questions into this stressful vawa process.

Edited by Rhema1
Posted
1 minute ago, Rosa Garcia said:

If I start writing letters to uscis every month asking about my case will this work and they will provide me with decision .?I have been waiting since November 2019 for the decision on my I-360...

Kindly contact your congressperson. 

It will help. 

Filed: Country: Jamaica
Timeline
Posted
19 hours ago, Royal Seed said:

@sandranj May you please answer my earlier question.

@sandranj I was never on removal proceeding and I renewed my C09 employment authorization twice in 2019 without any issue. I only got a notice of administrative closure for i-130 after the interview in 2018 when i told the officer I would be submitting i-360 and when I received a receipt notice, a copy was taken to her at the local office. Could this be a mistake from USCIS? Please, I need your assistance.

I-130 was closed because you filed I-360.

Phase I - IV - Completed the Immigration Journey 

 

 

Filed: Country: Jamaica
Timeline
Posted
11 hours ago, Rosa Garcia said:

If I start writing letters to uscis every month asking about my case will this work and they will provide me with decision .?I have been waiting since November 2019 for the decision on my I-360...

Not sure, I think that your Senator and US representative will be useful in contacting them monthly.  

Phase I - IV - Completed the Immigration Journey 

 

 

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...