NEA Board Member Suggests Unvaccinated with Religious Exemptions Deserve to Die

[Dashinka 24,488]

12 hours ago, yuna628 said:

If the school and the state has that waiver then yes certainly they could. I make no comment however if that is a moral or ethical thing for a parent to do. I had quite a different upbringing than most, to the point as I've said above, I'd just suggest parents start taking more of an involvement in their kid's education. Its the moral thing to do rather than potentially exposing others to physical harm not vaccinating presents (and likewise if you feel your kids would be harmed by exposure to some educational measure in the school). As Christians that would advocate homeschooling would say: you can't want to be a part of the 'world' and expect it to conform to your standards or expect others to not object. Simply eliminate the issue by doing it yourself.

You will have to watch out doing that in Joe Biden’s America, you may end up on Merrick Garland’s radar.

[LIBrty4all 3,749]

On 12/8/2021 at 2:36 PM, jg121783 said:

Back to the topic at hand. Is there no one that is disturbed by the fact that an NEA board member is talking this way?

My kids are grown now, and making their own vaccination choices.  So it's easy for me to say "idiots gonna idiot".

I will also add the the covid "vaccines" (aka experimental EUA drugs) were NOT vaccines until the definition of vaccine was changed this year to accommodate said EUA drugs.

[jg121783 3,915]

7 hours ago, LIBrty4all said:

My kids are grown now, and making their own vaccination choices.  So it's easy for me to say "idiots gonna idiot".

I will also add the the covid "vaccines" (aka experimental EUA drugs) were NOT vaccines until the definition of vaccine was changed this year to accommodate said EUA drugs.

The fact that the FDA wont be releasing the clinical data on the Pfizer approved shot for 75 years should make people hesitate a bit but some people will just do as they are told without question.

[Dashinka 24,488]

2 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

The fact that the FDA wont be releasing the clinical data on the Pfizer approved shot for 75 years should make people hesitate a bit but some people will just do as they are told without question.

That is in fact utterly amazing.  These folks are taxpayer paid bureaucrats, why are they hiding what should be public data from the public?

[jg121783 3,915]

1 minute ago, Dashinka said:

That is in fact utterly amazing.  These folks are taxpayer paid bureaucrats, why are they hiding what should be public data from the public?

Just take your FDA approved shot (if you can even find a location where it is available) and don't ask questions.

[Dashinka 24,488]

2 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

Just take your FDA approved shot (if you can even find a location where it is available) and don't ask questions.

Only approved for individuals over 16, so we are supposed to experiment on our children with no data showing any long-term effects.

[jg121783 3,915]

1 minute ago, Dashinka said:

Only approved for individuals over 16, so we are supposed to experiment on our children with no data showing any long-term effects.

Also its kind of interesting how this is the fastest "vaccine" approval in history but it is the longest period of time by far that it has ever taken to release the clinical data to the public.