Jump to content
jg121783

Why has Pfizer changed the formulation of its Covid-19 Vaccine for Children to include an ingredient that stabilises people suffering a Heart Attack?

82 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted

Our local med doctor tried to say it’s all on the up and up but didn’t have an answer on why would someone want to inject their kids with something that’s only been studied for 2 months, on limited number of children (under 2300), and with formulation changed without any safety studies. Had no answer for NNTV (number needed to vaccinate- the higher the number the worse the shot - In Pfizer case it’s not even listed though it has to be per CDC guidance. Other folks calculated the number to be infinity). Also tried to brush off myocarditis risk saying it’s mild and brief stay in the hospital - I don’t think so - heart damage is heart damage - doesn’t regenerate like liver.  I said keep doing your spiel I’m not getting shots for either of my kids. 

ROC 2009
Naturalization 2010

Posted
27 minutes ago, milimelo said:

Our local med doctor tried to say it’s all on the up and up but didn’t have an answer on why would someone want to inject their kids with something that’s only been studied for 2 months, on limited number of children (under 2300), and with formulation changed without any safety studies. Had no answer for NNTV (number needed to vaccinate- the higher the number the worse the shot - In Pfizer case it’s not even listed though it has to be per CDC guidance. Other folks calculated the number to be infinity). Also tried to brush off myocarditis risk saying it’s mild and brief stay in the hospital - I don’t think so - heart damage is heart damage - doesn’t regenerate like liver.  I said keep doing your spiel I’m not getting shots for either of my kids. 

How could any doctor say with a straight face that myocarditis is not a big deal when it comes to children? Anything more than a mild case is basically a death sentence for most children.

morfunphil1_zpsoja67jml.jpg

Country: Guyana
Timeline
Posted
46 minutes ago, milimelo said:

Our local med doctor tried to say it’s all on the up and up but didn’t have an answer on why would someone want to inject their kids with something that’s only been studied for 2 months, on limited number of children (under 2300), and with formulation changed without any safety studies. Had no answer for NNTV (number needed to vaccinate- the higher the number the worse the shot - In Pfizer case it’s not even listed though it has to be per CDC guidance. Other folks calculated the number to be infinity). Also tried to brush off myocarditis risk saying it’s mild and brief stay in the hospital - I don’t think so - heart damage is heart damage - doesn’t regenerate like liver.  I said keep doing your spiel I’m not getting shots for either of my kids. 

You should also ask him/her what the PROPER method of giving kids (or anyone) that additional ingredient they added.  I seem to recall it's intended for IV use, not IM.

Country: Guyana
Timeline
Posted

Covid-19 Vaccines and Myocarditis Link Probed by Researchers

https://archive.fo/s46CZ

 

 

 

U.S. Mountain Biking Champion — The Pfizer Vaccine ended my racing career…

 

US Mountain biking champion has career ruined by Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine

 

 

 

Bill Gates admits mRNA Vaccines aren’t working…

 

https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/bill-gates-admits-mrna-vaccines-arent-working/

 

 

 

 

 

 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted (edited)
48 minutes ago, LIBrty4all said:

A very good opinion piece that I'm sure most Americans with at least a modicum of intelligence can align with.  Written by a thrice-jabbed lady.

 

https://www.bostonherald.com/2021/11/08/mccaughey-new-vax-sciences-shows-mandates-unwise/

So even this writer is stating the truth of the vaccine only providing some level of protections to the individual jabbed, and there is little done as to stopping the spread.  Probably why the number of cases are still going up and down all over the place.

Edited by Dashinka

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Country: Guyana
Timeline
Posted
44 minutes ago, Dashinka said:

So even this writer is stating the truth of the vaccine only providing some level of protections to the individual jabbed, and there is little done as to stopping the spread.  Probably why the number of cases are still going up and down all over the place.

I think this video will help to answer that.  Remember, the definition of "vaccine" that was in use for over a decade was changed in 2021 because the mRNA drugs did not fit the bill, so they had to modify it.

 

 

 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted
16 minutes ago, LIBrty4all said:

I think this video will help to answer that.  Remember, the definition of "vaccine" that was in use for over a decade was changed in 2021 because the mRNA drugs did not fit the bill, so they had to modify it.

 

 

 

Search “Jordan Peterson Dave Rubin Covid” on YouTube.  I would post it, but some ears may not want to hear some bad words.  Peterson talks about how the Covid restrictions at least in Canada are poll driven and have almost nothing to do with science.  It appears to be the same in the US.

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted

Hmm, hope these kids will be ok.

 

Virginia pharmacy gave incorrect COVID-19 vaccine dose to younger kids: reports

 

https://www.foxnews.com/health/virginia-pharmacy-incorrect-covid-19-vaccine-dose-younger-kids

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted (edited)

This elegantly researched paper was withdrawn by the journal that accepted it, with no explanation, after publication agreements had been executed:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146280621002267

Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Posted
41 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

This elegantly researched paper was withdrawn by the journal that accepted it, with no explanation, after publication agreements had been executed:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146280621002267

That is the clue

Posted
23 hours ago, jg121783 said:

How could any doctor say with a straight face that myocarditis is not a big deal when it comes to children? Anything more than a mild case is basically a death sentence for most children.

I think he’s following company pr kit (anyone seen that clip of “brought to you by Pfizer”?). This is a guy refusing any notion of side effects or mistakes (one employee on a different continent was given monoclonal antibodies when the person came in for covid shot - didn’t have covid; there’s at least one case of person dying (vaccinated) but all they issued was sudden passing of employee) I can’t imagine them acknowledging anything happening to kids who already received the shots (12-17) and even less so for younger ones. 

ROC 2009
Naturalization 2010

  • 3 weeks later...
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

An eerie echo of the above from our caucus with Mini-B.'s pediatrician.  She refused to admit to any side effects or to acknowledge any attempts to discuss data.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...