Jump to content
LIBrty4all

Get Smart About What Really Happened in the 2020 Election

 Share

5 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Country: Guyana
Timeline
Quote

Two ingredients drove the outcome in 2020: First, private philanthropy injected into government election offices and, second, a banana-republic style suspension of agreed-upon election rules. You didn't need much outright voter fraud when these two ingredients combined to poison the 2020 election.

 

First, ponder the private philanthropy. The most lethal poison injected in the 2020 election was essentially legal. It worked like this.

 

In the months before the 2020 elections, Mark Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan donated hundreds of millions of dollars to the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL). Prior to Zuckerberg's largess, CTCL had an annual budget around $600,000 per year. 2020 would be a very good year for them.

 

The CTCL took "ZuckBucks" and with extreme, strategic precision, re-granted it to thousands of government election officials to "help" them conduct the 2020 election. It converted election offices in key jurisdictions with deep reservoirs of Biden votes into Formula One turnout-machines.

 

It is true that some small red counties got some CTCL money, but that was a fig leaf. Red counties took their grants and bought printers or paper. The real action was in the big cities, where hundreds of millions of dollars running through election offices fueled a ground game that, before 2020, the Democratic Party could only dream about.

 

Consider Philadelphia. Philadelphia's annual election office budget was about $9.5 million. The CTCL gave Philadelphia $10 million in one burst in the summer of 2020 to spend by election day. And boy did Philadelphia spend the money. They hired new city employees -- fresh from local activist groups -- to go door to do and deliver ballots. Since they worked for the election office, everything was "legal." They bought radio advertising on Spanish and urban radio stations; "get out the vote, vote by mail, no need for any witnesses anymore!"

I have seen figures of $350,000 as well as $400,000 that MZ "donated" to the cause.  Not sure which is accurate.  But compared to the regular CTCL annual budget of $600k, it was a very significant purchase of votes.

 

 

 

 

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/17833/what-happened-2020-election

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LIBrty4all said:

I have seen figures of $350,000 as well as $400,000 that MZ "donated" to the cause.  Not sure which is accurate.  But compared to the regular CTCL annual budget of $600k, it was a very significant purchase of votes.

 

 

 

 

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/17833/what-happened-2020-election

 

I don't think there was enough out and out fraud to turn the election, but I think this article explains it well. I think the suspension of the rules as mentioned in the article was big.

 

I gotz a buddy that had recently moved into an apartment and literally got 3 ballots in the mail for various former tenants. 

 

Of course GA passed some new rules and of course it's raaaassssit.

 

 

One rule was, groups supporting certain candidates were handing out food and water in the voting lines, which is not legal and they made the regulations more clear. Omg African Americans are going to die of thirst.  It's absurd. 

 

Major league baseball even moved the all star game 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Country: Guyana
Timeline
2 hours ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

I don't think there was enough out and out fraud to turn the election, but I think this article explains it well. I think the suspension of the rules as mentioned in the article was big.

Then you must have missed the videos of the suitcases full of ballots being pulled out from under tables after the observers were sent home in some places (wasn't it GA?).  Or places where the observers were forced to "observe" from a distance thru glass.  Or the states that allowed ballots to be mailed to every address on file.  

Yeah, there WAS fraud.  But I think the info in this article makes it clear how the dems bought the election.

 

And for anyone who believes Biden had 81 million votes after 45 weak politician years and two failed attempts at the presidency... well, let's just say they make special bridges just for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, LIBrty4all said:

Then you must have missed the videos of the suitcases full of ballots being pulled out from under tables after the observers were sent home in some places (wasn't it GA?).  Or places where the observers were forced to "observe" from a distance thru glass.  Or the states that allowed ballots to be mailed to every address on file.  

Yeah, there WAS fraud.  But I think the info in this article makes it clear how the dems bought the election.

 

And for anyone who believes Biden had 81 million votes after 45 weak politician years and two failed attempts at the presidency... well, let's just say they make special bridges just for them.

Anyone who is paying attention here in Wisconsin knows the state was clearly stolen for Biden in Milwaukee. They didn't even do a good job of covering it up. Same thing happened 2 years before and that is how we got an unpopular radical leftist governor.

morfunphil1_zpsoja67jml.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
On 10/31/2021 at 5:49 PM, jg121783 said:

Anyone who is paying attention here in Wisconsin knows the state was clearly stolen for Biden in Milwaukee.

See stand-alone thread just posted.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...