Emergency rooms across America getting FLOODED with patients suffering acute organ failure and debilitating symptoms… media claims it has nothing to do with covid vaccines

[jg121783 3,915]

https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-10-28-emergency-rooms-flooded-organ-failure-covid-vaccines.html

 

It's all the fault of the unvaccinated right?

[Mike E 11,739]

I think if the CHEST forum continues to be accessible to people who don’t have VJ credentials, these sorts of posts will result in VJ being de-platformed, something I am certain AILA would love to see happen. 😂

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,370]

15 minutes ago, Mike E said:

I think if the CHEST forum continues to be accessible to people who don’t have VJ credentials, these sorts of posts will result in VJ being de-platformed, something I am certain AILA would love to see happen. 😂

I will bite? What exactly does that mean

[Mike E 11,739]

2 minutes ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

I will bite? What exactly does that mean

Cancel Culture 

 

These sorts of posts contradict Covid vaccine orthodoxy.  Such content earns one a ban on Reddit, YouTube, Facebook, etc, and I can envision that web sites that counter vaccine orthodoxy will be removed from web search results and even denied DNS domain names.  
 

I’m a free speecher so this content doesn’t bother me any. 
 

 

[Dashinka 24,489]

24 minutes ago, Mike E said:

Cancel Culture 

 

These sorts of posts contradict Covid vaccine orthodoxy.  Such content earns one a ban on Reddit, YouTube, Facebook, etc, and I can envision that web sites that counter vaccine orthodoxy will be removed from web search results and even denied DNS domain names.  
 

I’m a free speecher so this content doesn’t bother me any. 
 

 

You are not up-to-date, it is Meta now.

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,370]

26 minutes ago, Mike E said:

Cancel Culture 

 

These sorts of posts contradict Covid vaccine orthodoxy.  Such content earns one a ban on Reddit, YouTube, Facebook, etc, and I can envision that web sites that counter vaccine orthodoxy will be removed from web search results and even denied DNS domain names.  
 

I’m a free speecher so this content doesn’t bother me any. 
 

 

Gotcha. Yes that site would make Alexis Jones Blush, but I am with you on the free speech thing. It's dangerous slope to go down to start censoring information no matter how absurd. 

[LIBrty4all 3,749]

52 minutes ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

Gotcha. Yes that site would make Alexis Jones Blush, but I am with you on the free speech thing. It's dangerous slope to go down to start censoring information no matter how absurd. 

As @laylalex would say, it's not kosher to attack the news source.  

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,370]

10 minutes ago, LIBrty4all said:

As @laylalex would say, it's not kosher to attack the news source.  

I did not attack anything or dispute the info. Just saying the website is a bit out there. As you have probably noticed I am doing my best to stay out of the covid debate thing. You are so reported LOL

 

btw 

I prefer more unbiased sources like MSNBC and CNN

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/natural-news/

 

• Overall, we rate Natural News a Questionable source based on the promotion of quackery level pseudoscience and conspiracy theories, as well as extreme right-wing bias. This is one of the most discredited sources on the internet.

Edited October 28, 2021 by Nature Boy 2.0

[jg121783 3,915]

4 minutes ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

I did not attack anything or dispute the info. Just saying the website is a bit out there. As you have probably noticed I am doing my best to stay out of the covid debate thing. You are so reported LOL

 

btw 

I prefer more unbiased sources like MSNBC and CNN

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/natural-news/

 

• Overall, we rate Natural News a Questionable source based on the promotion of quackery level pseudoscience and conspiracy theories, as well as extreme right-wing bias. This is one of the most discredited sources on the internet.

They have "fact check" in their name so they must be right.

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,370]

1 minute ago, jg121783 said:

They have "fact check" in their name so they must be right.

Mediabiasfactcheck does a fairly even handed job believe it or not. Here is what MSNBC got

 

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/msnbc/

 

LEFT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.

 

• Overall, we rate MSNBC Left Biased based on story selection that consistently favors the establishment left. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to news hosts and the website producing 3 pants on fire claims.

[jg121783 3,915]

3 minutes ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

Mediabiasfactcheck does a fairly even handed job believe it or not. Here is what MSNBC got

 

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/msnbc/

 

LEFT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.

 

• Overall, we rate MSNBC Left Biased based on story selection that consistently favors the establishment left. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to news hosts and the website producing 3 pants on fire claims.

A broken clock is right twice a day.

[LIBrty4all 3,749]

42 minutes ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

Overall, we rate Natural News a Questionable source based on the promotion of quackery level pseudoscience and conspiracy theories, as well as extreme right-wing bias. This is one of the most discredited sources on the internet.

 

Or, put another way...

Overall, we rate Natural News a Questionable source based on their not promoting the current beliefs of the left and opposing the status quo. 

[Mike E 11,739]

2 hours ago, Dashinka said:

You are not up-to-date, it is Meta now.

Thanks. I am caught up.  Now you are behind:

 

 

[Dashinka 24,489]

13 hours ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

Mediabiasfactcheck does a fairly even handed job believe it or not. Here is what MSNBC got

 

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/msnbc/

 

LEFT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.

 

• Overall, we rate MSNBC Left Biased based on story selection that consistently favors the establishment left. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to news hosts and the website producing 3 pants on fire claims.

Except isn’t MSNBC extreme Left?

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,370]

2 hours ago, Dashinka said:

Except isn’t MSNBC extreme Left?

That is obviously a rhetorical question