Sponsers household size

[Chene 4]

For household size in petitioners i864 form.in #3 "if you are currently married enter 1"if I press 1 in that area household size will be 3.is that correct?

In second form "I am sponsering the principal immigrant named in part 2" for petitioners form 864 I click on yes? In joint sponsors 864 form it's already clicked yes

Cr1 

Joint sponser being used

 

 

 

Just now, Chene said:

For household size in petitioners i864 form.in #3 "if you are currently married enter 1"if I press 1 in that area household size will be 3.is that correct?

In second form "I am sponsering the principal immigrant named in part 2" for petitioners form 864 I click on yes? In joint sponsors 864 form it's already clicked yes

Cr1 

Joint sponser being used

 

 

 

 

[SteveInBostonI130 3,459]

If this is for a joint sponsor, and the joint sponsor is married, then the household size is 3, assuming they have no children or other dependents.

 

If it is for the primary sponsor, and the beneficiary is your spouse, the household size is 2, as shown on the images you uploaded.  You do not count the "married spouse" if that spouse is the immigrant beneficiary.

[Chene 4]

34 minutes ago, SteveInBostonI130 said:

If this is for a joint sponsor, and the joint sponsor is married, then the household size is 3, assuming they have no children or other dependents.

 

If it is for the primary sponsor, and the beneficiary is your spouse, the household size is 2, as shown on the images you uploaded.  You do not count the "married spouse" if that spouse is the immigrant beneficiar

So it would be like this correct? For petitioners form I'm trying not to do any errors,I read one little error will delay 😚

Edited September 27, 2021 by Chene

[SteveInBostonI130 3,459]

1 minute ago, Chene said:

So it would be like this correct? For petitioners form I'm trying not to do any errors,I read one little error will delay 😚

 

For the petitioner, who is the primary sponsor, yes.

[Chene 4]

6 minutes ago, SteveInBostonI130 said:

 

For the petitioner, who is the primary sponsor, yes.

Thank you😁