FDA Panel Member on COVID Vaccines: 'Heart Attacks Happen 71 Times More Often...'

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,376]

46 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

Really? Here is some of the evidence I found within a few minutes of searching google. There is plenty more where this came from:

 

Ivermectin as a SARS-CoV-2 Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Method in Healthcare Workers: A Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Cohort Study

https://www.cureus.com/articles/63131-ivermectin-as-a-sars-cov-2-pre-exposure-prophylaxis-method-in-healthcare-workers-a-propensity-score-matched-retrospective-cohort-study

 

Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19

https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/fulltext/2021/06000/review_of_the_emerging_evidence_demonstrating_the.4.aspx

 

The mechanisms of action of Ivermectin against SARS-CoV-2: An evidence-based clinical review article

 

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41429-021-00430-5

 

But you go ahead and keep believing the people saying anyone who uses ivermectin is taking horse paste.

First paragraph 

 

22 June 2021 Editor’s Note: Readers are alerted that the conclusions of this paper are subject to criticisms that are being considered by the editors and the publisher. A further editorial response will follow the resolution of these issues.

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,376]

Flawed ivermectin preprint highlights challenges of COVID drug studies

The study’s withdrawal from a preprint platform deals a blow to the anti-parasite drug’s chances as a COVID treatment, researchers say.

 

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02081-w

 

From the actual website you quoted

Edited September 24, 2021 by Nature Boy 2.0

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,376]

The shaky science behind ivermectin as a COVID-19 cure

Studies are inconclusive and misinformation is rampant. But many Americans now see a deworming medicine as a go-to drug to prevent and fight the Delta variant.

https://api.nationalgeographic.com/distribution/public/amp/science/article/the-shaky-science-behind-ivermectin-as-a-covid-19-cure

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,376]

And from one of the most respected medical organizations In the world a peer reviewed. 

 

JAMA study: Ivermectin doesn't speed up recovery for patients with mild COVID-19

Published: June 29, 2021 at 5:47 p.m. ET

 

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/jama-study-ivermectin-doesnt-speed-up-recovery-for-patients-with-mild-covid-19-2021-03-05

[jg121783 3,919]

56 minutes ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

First paragraph 

 

22 June 2021 Editor’s Note: Readers are alerted that the conclusions of this paper are subject to criticisms that are being considered by the editors and the publisher. A further editorial response will follow the resolution of these issues.

That was back in June and no response. They must not have considered the "criticisms" worthy of a response. Besides that what about the other two I posted?

[LIBrty4all 3,754]

3 hours ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

First paragraph 

 

22 June 2021 Editor’s Note: Readers are alerted that the conclusions of this paper are subject to criticisms that are being considered by the editors and the publisher. A further editorial response will follow the resolution of these issues.

What are your thoughts on the PCR test they have been using for over a year that isn't really intended for covid, and causes SO MANY false positives due to exaggerated Ct?  You know, the one that is being done away with due to inaccuracies, yet is still being used today?  I mean, it's "approved", so it must be legit, right?

 

Yes, it is yet early and Ivermectin studies are still being done, but thus far, it has killed FAR fewer people than the EUA drugs have.  If it turns out to be not effective enough, then so be it, and the horses and cattle will not have to worry about a shortage.  But enough doctors are prescribing it today that we should know more soon.

 

I'm surprised by the number of people who are so trusting to just do what they are being told by the Government, and particularly that bold-faced liar Fauci.  If you want to understand what's going on, all you have to do is follow the money trails.

[LIBrty4all 3,754]

3 hours ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

And from one of the most respected medical organizations In the world a peer reviewed. 

 

JAMA study: Ivermectin doesn't speed up recovery for patients with mild COVID-19

Published: June 29, 2021 at 5:47 p.m. ET

 

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/jama-study-ivermectin-doesnt-speed-up-recovery-for-patients-with-mild-covid-19-2021-03-05

And why WOULD it?  People with mild covid are naturally fine in a few days.  Everyone I know who has had covid was over it within 2-4 days, except one person who had it hang on tightly for two weeks, then was weak for about a month afterwards.  Of course, he is morbidly obese and has diabetes and is a vegetarian, but I'm sure those thing have nothing to do with how severe his symptoms were.

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,376]

51 minutes ago, LIBrty4all said:

What are your thoughts on the PCR test they have been using for over a year that isn't really intended for covid, and causes SO MANY false positives due to exaggerated Ct?  You know, the one that is being done away with due to inaccuracies, yet is still being used today?  I mean, it's "approved", so it must be legit, right?

 

Yes, it is yet early and Ivermectin studies are still being done, but thus far, it has killed FAR fewer people than the EUA drugs have.  If it turns out to be not effective enough, then so be it, and the horses and cattle will not have to worry about a shortage.  But enough doctors are prescribing it today that we should know more soon.

 

I'm surprised by the number of people who are so trusting to just do what they are being told by the Government, and particularly that bold-faced liar Fauci.  If you want to understand what's going on, all you have to do is follow the money trails.

I really don't know much about the PCR test.

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,376]

50 minutes ago, LIBrty4all said:

And why WOULD it?  People with mild covid are naturally fine in a few days.  Everyone I know who has had covid was over it within 2-4 days, except one person who had it hang on tightly for two weeks, then was weak for about a month afterwards.  Of course, he is morbidly obese and has diabetes and is a vegetarian, but I'm sure those thing have nothing to do with how severe his symptoms were.

You must not know many people.  I know many that have died including the owner of my company. 

 

His grandson who is about 35 or so and the owner was in the hospital for a week. 4 weeks later still has o2 sat problems , weakness etc

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,376]

3 hours ago, jg121783 said:

That was back in June and no response. They must not have considered the "criticisms" worthy of a response. Besides that what about the other two I posted?

I really don't have time to debunk every" IVOMEC is the save all and big pharma does not want it to work , the vaccine is deadly, black helicopter, Chem trails "post".

I think I have posted enough evidence and shared what my doctor said.

 

Once again since we are aggressively debating..Mad respect for you and most posters here, I just feel you are way wrong about this. I agree with you most of the time.

 

[yuna628 9,686]

9 hours ago, jg121783 said:

Never heard of that. But good job trying to lump together a treatment that is effective with one that presumably isn't. That's called a red herring.

It's not effective. Nor is snorting Betadine. Nor is another new trend of basically huffing benzyl peroxide and ammonia, but they are doing that too. Can't wait for the brain, liver, and stomach damage which doctors will dutifully have to treat and the person will keep insisting it's all a conspiracy.

Edited September 25, 2021 by yuna628

[LIBrty4all 3,754]

4 hours ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

You must not know many people.  I know many that have died including the owner of my company. 

 

His grandson who is about 35 or so and the owner was in the hospital for a week. 4 weeks later still has o2 sat problems , weakness etc

I know 6 people who have died in the past 22 or so months.  Every single one was shortly (3 days to 2 months) after receiving a vaccination.

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,376]

2 hours ago, LIBrty4all said:

I know 6 people who have died in the past 22 or so months.  Every single one was shortly (3 days to 2 months) after receiving a vaccination.

So you personally knew 6 people who died from taking the vaccine over the last 22 months.  The same vaccine that has only been available for approx 9 to 10 months. 

 

 Dude .. that's just such obvious you know what . 

Edited September 25, 2021 by Nature Boy 2.0

[LIBrty4all 3,754]

8 hours ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

So you personally knew 6 people who died from taking the vaccine over the last 22 months.  The same vaccine that has only been available for approx 9 to 10 months. 

 

 Dude .. that's just such obvious you know what . 

So reading comprehension is also distorted when one is sideways-up in the MDL, I see.

 

I never said anyone died from the vaccine 22 months ago.  I simply used that frame of reference for deaths to include the entire covid period.  Re-worded just for you:

In the past 22 months, I know no won in my circle of famile & freinds who have gotten ded from covid.  However, since March 2021, I no of six who have died shourtly after gitten' jabbed.  Is that beter four yew?

 

Cue BanHammer....

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,376]

51 minutes ago, LIBrty4all said:

So reading comprehension is also distorted when one is sideways-up in the MDL, I see.

 

I never said anyone died from the vaccine 22 months ago.  I simply used that frame of reference for deaths to include the entire covid period.  Re-worded just for you:

In the past 22 months, I know no won in my circle of famile & freinds who have gotten ded from covid.  However, since March 2021, I no of six who have died shourtly after gitten' jabbed.  Is that beter four yew?

 

Cue BanHammer....

Ps it's no one not "No won" kerrectul of your grammar is getting to be chore