Jump to content

70 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted
10 minutes ago, Crtcl Rice Theory said:

So you don't trust the FDA approval,  in favor of the FDA approved medicine (for something else totally unrelated to covid infection). 

 

So when are we supposed to trust drug makers and the FDA?

 

When they say stuff we like, I think? 🤷‍♀️

Posted
6 minutes ago, Crtcl Rice Theory said:

So you don't trust the FDA approval,  in favor of the FDA approved medicine (for something else totally unrelated to covid infection). 

 

So when are we supposed to trust drug makers and the FDA?

 

Just saying I have a lot more trust for a medicine that is FDA approved and has an FDA approved version available to the public, has a long track record of being safe and has showed promise in treating covid versus a medicine that is emergency use authorized, recently gained a rushed and secretive FDA approval (and the FDA approved version isn't even publicly available) and doesn't look too promising in the safety or effectiveness department.

morfunphil1_zpsoja67jml.jpg

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
7 hours ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

I feel rewarded that iz the uonly issues youz founded with my statement 

English-only outside the regional forums!  Reported!!!

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted
52 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

Just saying I have a lot more trust for a medicine that is FDA approved and has an FDA approved version available to the public, has a long track record of being safe and has showed promise in treating covid versus a medicine that is emergency use authorized, recently gained a rushed and secretive FDA approval (and the FDA approved version isn't even publicly available) and doesn't look too promising in the safety or effectiveness department.

Wrong information on several points. Good luck with your antivax strategy avoiding this disease. 

Country: Guyana
Timeline
Posted
4 hours ago, Crtcl Rice Theory said:

So you don't trust the FDA approval,  in favor of the FDA approved medicine (for something else totally unrelated to covid infection). 

 

So when are we supposed to trust drug makers and the FDA?

 

A) Ivermectin has been safely used for decades without issue.  Time is on its side.

 

B) There is no FDA-approved covid drug, just the rushed-into-headlong EUA experimental one.

Posted
5 hours ago, LIBrty4all said:

A) Ivermectin has been safely used for decades without issue.  Time is on its side.

 

B) There is no FDA-approved covid drug, just the rushed-into-headlong EUA experimental one.

Well Glucophage is proven safe and FDA approved.  Why not take it. It will do you as much good as IVOMEC.  Suggesting a drug is good for Corona,  just because it is FDA approved is lunacy. 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

Well Glucophage is proven safe and FDA approved.  Why not take it. It will do you as much good as IVOMEC.  Suggesting a drug is good for Corona,  just because it is FDA approved is lunacy. 

 

 

No one is suggesting a drug can treat covid simply because it is FDA approved. That is a strawman. I can't speak for others but when I bring up the long time FDA approval and safety record of ivermectin it is to show that it is safer than we are being told. The numerous cases of people recovering from covid after taking ivermectin is what suggests that it can treat covid. Not the FDA approval.

morfunphil1_zpsoja67jml.jpg

Posted
10 hours ago, Crtcl Rice Theory said:

Wrong information on several points. Good luck with your antivax strategy avoiding this disease. 

What exactly am I incorrect about? I'm not an anti vaxxer by the way. Opposing the covid "vaccine" doesn't make someone an anti vaxxer.

morfunphil1_zpsoja67jml.jpg

Country: Guyana
Timeline
Posted
3 hours ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

Well Glucophage is proven safe and FDA approved.  Why not take it. It will do you as much good as IVOMEC.  Suggesting a drug is good for Corona,  just because it is FDA approved is lunacy. 

 

 

You really have to stop reading the FB stuff.  Several doctors have used Ivermectin to treat covid successfully.  I have friends who had it prescribed when the got covid recently.  No one is suggesting to use it just because it is FDA approved.  There is about as much information and timeline of the efficacy of Ivermectin as there was with the "vaccines" that were used back in December.  The only difference being that NO ONE is dying from Ivermectin, while many are after getting the EUA approved drugs.

Posted
3 hours ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

Well Glucophage is proven safe and FDA approved.  Why not take it. It will do you as much good as IVOMEC.  Suggesting a drug is good for Corona,  just because it is FDA approved is lunacy. 

 

 

Wait until you hear about the snorting and drinking Betadine thing...

Our Journey Timeline  - Immigration and the Health Exchange Price of Love in the UK Thinking of Returning to UK?

 

First met: 12/31/04 - Engaged: 9/24/09
Filed I-129F: 10/4/14 - Packet received: 10/7/14
NOA 1 email + ARN assigned: 10/10/14 (hard copy 10/17/14)
Touched on website (fixed?): 12/9/14 - Poked USCIS: 4/1/15
NOA 2 email: 5/4/15 (hard copy 5/11/15)
Sent to NVC: 5/8/15 - NVC received + #'s assigned: 5/15/15 (estimated)
NVC sent: 5/19/15 - London received/ready: 5/26/15
Packet 3: 5/28/15 - Medical: 6/16/15
Poked London 7/1/15 - Packet 4: 7/2/15
Interview: 7/30/15 - Approved!
AP + Issued 8/3/15 - Visa in hand (depot): 8/6/15
POE: 8/27/15

Wedding: 9/30/15

Filed I-485, I-131, I-765: 11/7/15

Packet received: 11/9/15

NOA 1 txt/email: 11/15/15 - NOA 1 hardcopy: 11/19/15

Bio: 12/9/15

EAD + AP approved: 1/25/16 - EAD received: 2/1/16

RFE for USCIS inability to read vax instructions: 5/21/16 (no e-notification & not sent from local office!)

RFE response sent: 6/7/16 - RFE response received 6/9/16

AOS approved/card in production: 6/13/16  

NOA 2 hardcopy + card sent 6/17/16

Green Card received: 6/18/16

USCIS 120 day reminder notice: 2/22/18

Filed I-751: 5/2/18 - Packet received: 5/4/18

NOA 1:  5/29/18 (12 mo ext) 8/13/18 (18 mo ext)  - Bio: 6/27/18

Transferred: Potomac Service Center 3/26/19

Approved/New Card Produced status: 4/25/19 - NOA2 hardcopy 4/29/19

10yr Green Card Received: 5/2/19 with error >_<

N400 : 7/16/23 - Oath : 10/19/23

 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, yuna628 said:

Wait until you hear about the snorting and drinking Betadine thing...

Never heard of that. But good job trying to lump together a treatment that is effective with one that presumably isn't. That's called a red herring.

morfunphil1_zpsoja67jml.jpg

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted
15 hours ago, Crtcl Rice Theory said:

Wrong information on several points. Good luck with your antivax strategy avoiding this disease. 

Interesting how people that are against forcibly jabbing someone with a drug/vaccine and wanting more information are labeled antivaxxers.  I just love identity politics.

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Posted
1 hour ago, jg121783 said:

Never heard of that. But good job trying to lump together a treatment that is effective with one that presumably isn't. That's called a red herring.

Not one credible shred of evidence Ivomec works. As I stated my doctor looked at all the research and it was totally bogus.  There are several legit studies that prove it has zero effect on covid.

 

Is it dangerous if given the human version under a doctors care. Probably not.

 

To be clear. Just because I disagree with some of you here on some of the wild conspiracy covid claims does not mean I don't respect you or your opnion. 

 

I do think some of you not admitting the science does not support your claims and you are wrong, is more due to toxic masculinity. 

Posted (edited)

Ivermectin for Covid-19: abundance of hype, dearth of evidence

https://www.statnews.com/2021/08/25/ivermectin-for-covid-19-abundance-of-hype-dearth-of-evidence/

 

A British medical student, Jack Lawrence, was assigned to evaluate the Elgazzar paper for a course and encountered a potpourri of apparent plagiarism and data fabrication. The Elgazzar paper had not been formally published in a medical journal, but had appeared instead on a preprint website called Research Square. Upon learning of Lawrence’s analysis, 

 

Infectious Diseases Society of America concur. Even Merck, an ivermectin manufacturer, avers that there is “no meaningful evidence for clinical activity or efficacy in patients with Covid-19.” And just last weekend the FDA warned people not to use the drug as a treatment for Covid-19.

Edited by Nature Boy 2.0
Posted
1 hour ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

Not one credible shred of evidence Ivomec works. As I stated my doctor looked at all the research and it was totally bogus.  There are several legit studies that prove it has zero effect on covid.

 

Is it dangerous if given the human version under a doctors care. Probably not.

 

To be clear. Just because I disagree with some of you here on some of the wild conspiracy covid claims does not mean I don't respect you or your opnion. 

 

I do think some of you not admitting the science does not support your claims and you are wrong, is more due to toxic masculinity. 

Really? Here is some of the evidence I found within a few minutes of searching google. There is plenty more where this came from:

 

Ivermectin as a SARS-CoV-2 Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Method in Healthcare Workers: A Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Cohort Study

https://www.cureus.com/articles/63131-ivermectin-as-a-sars-cov-2-pre-exposure-prophylaxis-method-in-healthcare-workers-a-propensity-score-matched-retrospective-cohort-study

 

Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19

https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/fulltext/2021/06000/review_of_the_emerging_evidence_demonstrating_the.4.aspx

 

The mechanisms of action of Ivermectin against SARS-CoV-2: An evidence-based clinical review article

 

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41429-021-00430-5

 

But you go ahead and keep believing the people saying anyone who uses ivermectin is taking horse paste.

morfunphil1_zpsoja67jml.jpg

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...