Jump to content
TBoneTX

FDA Panel Member on COVID Vaccines: 'Heart Attacks Happen 71 Times More Often...'

 Share

70 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

Adverse effects of the virus shots (from an FDA panel member), plus figures from earlier this year (a running question here) about how many FDA/NIAID employees hadn't yet been vaccinated.  Comments?

Quote

FDA Panel Member on COVID Vaccines: 'Heart Attacks Happen 71 Times More Often...'

By Selwyn Duke - September 20, 2021

 

[...] Consider the testimonial of Steve Kirsch, executive director of the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund and also identified as a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) panel member.  In an eight-hour virtual discussion of the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee released Friday by the FDA, Kirsch said there "are four times as many heart attacks [as is normal] in the treatment group in the Pfizer six-month trial report — that wasn't bad luck."  [...]

 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/09/fda_panel_member_on_covid_vaccines_heart_attacks_happen_71_times_more_often.html  

 

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
17 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

Adverse effects of the virus shots (from an FDA panel member), plus figures from earlier this year (a running question here) about how many FDA/NIAID employees hadn't yet been vaccinated.  Comments?

" FDA Panel Member", what does that mean? There were no opinions from Doctors mentioned in the article that I could see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

You're right -- the guy is a real lightweight who had no business trying to analyze data:

https://www.treatearly.org/team/steve-kirsch

Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline

Fauci does have a lot of blood on his hands.

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Crtcl Rice Theory said:

" FDA Panel Member", what does that mean? There were no opinions from Doctors mentioned in the article that I could see.

 

9 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

You're right -- the guy is a real lightweight who had no business trying to analyze data:

https://www.treatearly.org/team/steve-kirsch

This guy is definitely no Faucci. Probably hasn't been a beurocrat for as long.

morfunphil1_zpsoja67jml.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Crtcl Rice Theory said:

" FDA Panel Member", what does that mean? There were no opinions from Doctors mentioned in the article that I could see.

Not sure. He is not a doctor, never was one, and has no background in anything involving medicine or treating patients. He has made numerous crazy and incorrect claims. He does NOT sit on the FDA board and has nothing to do with the FDA, the CDC, or anything.

Our Journey Timeline  - Immigration and the Health Exchange Price of Love in the UK Thinking of Returning to UK?

 

First met: 12/31/04 - Engaged: 9/24/09
Filed I-129F: 10/4/14 - Packet received: 10/7/14
NOA 1 email + ARN assigned: 10/10/14 (hard copy 10/17/14)
Touched on website (fixed?): 12/9/14 - Poked USCIS: 4/1/15
NOA 2 email: 5/4/15 (hard copy 5/11/15)
Sent to NVC: 5/8/15 - NVC received + #'s assigned: 5/15/15 (estimated)
NVC sent: 5/19/15 - London received/ready: 5/26/15
Packet 3: 5/28/15 - Medical: 6/16/15
Poked London 7/1/15 - Packet 4: 7/2/15
Interview: 7/30/15 - Approved!
AP + Issued 8/3/15 - Visa in hand (depot): 8/6/15
POE: 8/27/15

Wedding: 9/30/15

Filed I-485, I-131, I-765: 11/7/15

Packet received: 11/9/15

NOA 1 txt/email: 11/15/15 - NOA 1 hardcopy: 11/19/15

Bio: 12/9/15

EAD + AP approved: 1/25/16 - EAD received: 2/1/16

RFE for USCIS inability to read vax instructions: 5/21/16 (no e-notification & not sent from local office!)

RFE response sent: 6/7/16 - RFE response received 6/9/16

AOS approved/card in production: 6/13/16  

NOA 2 hardcopy + card sent 6/17/16

Green Card received: 6/18/16

USCIS 120 day reminder notice: 2/22/18

Filed I-751: 5/2/18 - Packet received: 5/4/18

NOA 1:  5/29/18 (12 mo ext) 8/13/18 (18 mo ext)  - Bio: 6/27/18

Transferred: Potomac Service Center 3/26/19

Approved/New Card Produced status: 4/25/19 - NOA2 hardcopy 4/29/19

10yr Green Card Received: 5/2/19 with error >_<

N400 : 7/16/23 - Oath : 10/19/23

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, yuna628 said:

Not sure. He is not a doctor, never was one, and has no background in anything involving medicine or treating patients. He has made numerous crazy and incorrect claims. He does NOT sit on the FDA board and has nothing to do with the FDA, the CDC, or anything.

He doesn't even identify himself as a panel member. He's a guy who gave testimony at a hearing.

People give testimony at hearings before Congress all the time. Does that make them members of Congress?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Crtcl Rice Theory said:

" FDA Panel Member", what does that mean? There were no opinions from Doctors mentioned in the article that I could see.

Thank you for doing the light lifting.  Lol.

 

I had a good conversation with my Doctor today. He is a true medical geek that really gets into research. 

 

 He said the whole IVOMEC supposedly treats covid is total bull. He said the couple of studies that suggested it was effective were totally un scientific and even out right falsified data. He said, that they hit a few websites, the tinfoil hat crowd got ahold of it and the rest is history. 

 He said that also makes him furious that some would suggest doctors would not use whatever is safe and effective to treat a patient. 

 

He did say there are some very preliminary studies that suggest a drug used to treat gout "Cholchicine"  may be effective.  He did stress preliminary 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

Thank you for doing the light lifting.  Lol.

 

I had a good conversation with my Doctor today. He is a true medical geek that really gets into research. 

 

 He said the whole IVOMEC supposedly treats covid is total bull. He said the couple of studies that suggested it was effective were totally un scientific and even out right falsified data. He said, that they hit a few websites, the tinfoil hat crowd got ahold of it and the rest is history. 

 He said that also makes him furious that some would suggest doctors would not use whatever is safe and effective to treat a patient. 

 

He did say there are some very preliminary studies that suggest a drug used to treat gout "Cholchicine"  may be effective.  He did stress preliminary 

My mom (literally Doctor Mom) said she is waiting to hear the results from the NIH and Oxford studies, which are both large-scale and anonymized. She -- who is the biggest anti-quack I know -- encouraged me to keep an open mind for future results, but for now it's not a proven treatment and she would never prescribe it for a patient until it's approved. If it is an effective treatment in some people, great! We'll know it works and for whom, and for whom it doesn't, and doctors can prescribe accordingly. But until then, nope. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LIBrty4all said:

Who would know more about funeral homes being overwhelmed than a funeral director?
 

https://www.bitchute.com/embed/gJYsYMZgtcmn/ 

Dear god you have jumped the shark. Lol

Are you really serious. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
1 hour ago, LIBrty4all said:

Clearly you didn't watch it.  Guess the reception sideways up in the MDL makes it tough.

909391422_nbmdl.thumb.jpg.7739a5cc01279c81d58f976dba88cfd5.jpg

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
5 hours ago, laylalex said:

My mom (literally Doctor Mom) said she is waiting to hear the results from the NIH and Oxford studies, which are both large-scale and anonymized. She -- who is the biggest anti-quack I know -- encouraged me to keep an open mind for future results, but for now it's not a proven treatment and she would never prescribe it for a patient until it's approved. If it is an effective treatment in some people, great! We'll know it works and for whom, and for whom it doesn't, and doctors can prescribe accordingly. But until then, nope. 

2O4M.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...