Jump to content

39 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted

Sorry for this off-topic post, but it’s important:

 

Guys, you will save yourself a lot of trouble if you do this one thing: hire a driving instructor.

 

We had threads about this in the past, and the overwhelming opinion was to hire a driving instructor.  
 

I wish I had done so!

 

~ Tahoma

Posted
8 hours ago, Jorgedig said:

I stand by what I said.  

 

K-1 arrivals who have a pending AOS case and who leave the US without AP are presumed to have abandoned their case.  This is a well-known drawback to the K-1 vs a CR-1, as CR-1 holders receive GCs immediately and do not need AP.

 

Anyone who would rely on the possibility of being granted an info pass to ask for emergency in the era of COVID is naive if they expect it to be 'easy.'  And knowing this, IF there is a possibility of needing to travel back home emergently before having AP, a K visa is not the best choice.

You stated "In addition to being unable to work, she would not be able to return to the US if she leaves during this time" .  Which has been proved false by a long time poster in the Philippines Section.  I am gonna take his word instead of your word since he has actual knowledge and know people who has done it.

 

As a general rule people coming to the USA either on fiance or Spousal visa will not be "needing to travel back home emergently".

 

I will follow and tend to listen to Chinooks opinions on this matter 

Posted
8 hours ago, Joe Kano said:

You stated "In addition to being unable to work, she would not be able to return to the US if she leaves during this time" .  Which has been proved false by a long time poster in the Philippines Section.  I am gonna take his word instead of your word since he has actual knowledge and know people who has done it.

 

As a general rule people coming to the USA either on fiance or Spousal visa will not be "needing to travel back home emergently".

 

I will follow and tend to listen to Chinooks opinions on this matter 

LOL.   So you think K-1 visa holders can come and go without AP?

Posted
16 hours ago, Jorgedig said:

LOL.   So you think K-1 visa holders can come and go without AP?

So you want to twist my comments?

 

You said "In addition to being unable to work, she would not be able to return to the US if she leaves during this time."

 

Which is false and you can actually apply to emergency AP, and a long time poster familiar with this say it's possible.  And further if one wants to work and is working for a company outside the USA then you can work during K1 process, you know and I know this is a gray area.

 

You seem to be real familiar with the Philippines and the culture.   

 

How many trips have you made over to the Philippines?  Did you ever live in the Philippines?

Posted
7 hours ago, Joe Kano said:

So you want to twist my comments?

 

You said "In addition to being unable to work, she would not be able to return to the US if she leaves during this time."

 

Which is false and you can actually apply to emergency AP, and a long time poster familiar with this say it's possible.  And further if one wants to work and is working for a company outside the USA then you can work during K1 process, you know and I know this is a gray area.

 

You seem to be real familiar with the Philippines and the culture.   

 

How many trips have you made over to the Philippines?  Did you ever live in the Philippines?

How are my comments about EAD and AP anything even remotely to do with the Philippines?   
 

Bottom line for other readers:   I would not rely on the potential for getting emergency AP these days, and the ability to travel home emergently remains one of the primary benefits of the CR-1 vs K-1.

Posted
41 minutes ago, Jorgedig said:

How are my comments about EAD and AP anything even remotely to do with the Philippines?   
 

Bottom line for other readers:   I would not rely on the potential for getting emergency AP these days, and the ability to travel home emergently remains one of the primary benefits of the CR-1 vs K-1.

I was just wondering how many trips you have made to the Philippines?  

 

Did you use to live there? I was curious?  You are always hanging out in the Philippines sections

Posted
45 minutes ago, Joe Kano said:

I was just wondering how many trips you have made to the Philippines?  

 

Did you use to live there? I was curious?  You are always hanging out in the Philippines sections

LOL, I read most of the boards here.   And as most people see new messages in the order they’re posted on the front page, it’s an assortment from all the boards.

Posted
17 minutes ago, Jorgedig said:

LOL, I read most of the boards here.   And as most people see new messages in the order they’re posted on the front page, it’s an assortment from all the boards.

So since you won't answer the question, I am gonna assume never

 

Kinda what I was thinking

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Thread is locked for review.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Thread is reopened; administrative action has been applied to one participant's account for derailing the thread and violating these provisions of the site's Terms of Service:

 

"Make comments in a Post either direct or implied toward another member that are purposely designed to upset, antagonize, make fun of, belittle, harass, insult, or otherwise instigate an argument that takes away from the personal enjoyment of the Service by other users";

and

"Restrict or inhibit any other user from using and enjoying the Forums."

 

Stay on topic from here on.

 

TBoneTX

for VJ Moderation

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Posted
On 8/14/2021 at 6:34 PM, Jorgedig said:

I stand by what I said.  

 

K-1 arrivals who have a pending AOS case and who leave the US without AP are presumed to have abandoned their case.  This is a well-known drawback to the K-1 vs a CR-1, as CR-1 holders receive GCs immediately and do not need AP.

 

Anyone who would rely on the possibility of being granted an info pass to ask for emergency in the era of COVID is naive if they expect it to be 'easy.'  And knowing this, IF there is a possibility of needing to travel back home emergently before having AP, a K visa is not the best choice.

Advance parole is available for K1’ers regardless of whether they have married or not.  It’s not an uncommon procedure.  You can read about it on the USCIS website.  
 

Also, visa re-validation is possible in cases where K1’ers leave the U.S. without advance parole, but that’s a risky strategy. 
 

 

Posted
15 minutes ago, Tahoma said:

Advance parole is available for K1’ers regardless of whether they have married or not.  It’s not an uncommon procedure.  You can read about it on the USCIS website.  
 

Also, visa re-validation is possible in cases where K1’ers leave the U.S. without advance parole, but that’s a risky strategy. 
 

 

And neither option should be a realistic part of anyone's plan in the event of an emergency.   With current AP processing times what they are, CR-1 is still a much better choice.

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...