Jump to content
TBoneTX

The 'Centers for Disease Control' is No Such Thing

 Share

19 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

This is easy reading.  Comments?

Quote

The 'Centers for Disease Control' is No Such Thing

By Ted Noel, MD

 

You read that right.  That's the name on the sign in front of the building.  It's the advertising when one of its higher level bureaucrats testifies before Congress.  And it's the bludgeon used to corral all dissenters into one place where individual choice is extinguished.  Beyond all that, it's a lie.  [...]

 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/08/the_centers_for_disease_control_is_no_such_thing.html  

 

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline

 

4 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

This is easy reading.  Comments?

Trump will be reinstated any day now. He alone can fix it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

If he does run and win, he won't neglect the housecleaning this time.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Crtcl Rice Theory said:

 

Trump will be reinstated any day now. He alone can fix it.

Trump will not be reinstated. We are stuck with the dementia addled usurper until 2024 (or until he is removed for being unfit for office and replaced by Kamala). Anyone who can't accept that is delusional.

morfunphil1_zpsoja67jml.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
13 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

This is easy reading.  Comments?

Here is the 411 on Dr Ted Noel, MD, license expired

 

https://factcheck.afp.com/doctor-expired-license-falsely-claims-masks-dont-work

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Country: Guyana
Timeline
1 hour ago, Crtcl Rice Theory said:

Here is the 411 on Dr Ted Noel, MD, license expired

 

https://factcheck.afp.com/doctor-expired-license-falsely-claims-masks-dont-work

When a person's license expires, that means they can no longer do the work they were certified for.  It doesn't mean they suddenly forget all their experience, knowledge, and expertise.

 

To dumb it down a little, a truck driver can let his CDL expire, but that doesn't mean he's not a good driver still, nor that he is rendered unable to drive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LIBrty4all said:

Tell you what.  Put your mask on.  Adjust it properly.  Now rip a big ole fart and see what it smells like.  Simple yet effective test for how well the masks keep out viruses.

  Just becuse your olfactory senses can smell a scent carried by matter in the gas state through a mask, it does not mean it will not help slow the spread of a Virus encapsulated by matter in the liquid state. 

   Trying to tie that analogy, to the possible ineffectiveness of masks, must have taken some amazing mental gymnastics. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline

image.png.28ec5faa5244e29889f1878ea557ac5c.png

3 hours ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

  Just becuse your olfactory senses can smell a scent carried by matter in the gas state through a mask, it does not mean it will not help slow the spread of a Virus encapsulated by matter in the liquid state. 

   Trying to tie that analogy, to the possible ineffectiveness of masks, must have taken some amazing mental gymnastics. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

It's objective fact that masks, even with borders plastered around one's face, can't come close to blocking tiny viral particles.

 

I don't know whether or not "building a chain-link fence to keep mosquitoes out" is an accurate description in terms of the size differential between viral particles and mask pores.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
24 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

It's objective fact that masks, even with borders plastered around one's face, can't come close to blocking tiny viral particles.

 

I don't know whether or not "building a chain-link fence to keep mosquitoes out" is an accurate description in terms of the size differential between viral particles and mask pores.

I think there is a misunderstanding here. The virus doesn't get exhaled on its own. It embeds itself into the droplets and moisture people exhale. You are not stopping the virus, you are stopping it's vehicle of transmission.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Country: Guyana
Timeline
7 hours ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

  Just becuse your olfactory senses can smell a scent carried by matter in the gas state through a mask, it does not mean it will not help slow the spread of a Virus encapsulated by matter in the liquid state. 

   Trying to tie that analogy, to the possible ineffectiveness of masks, must have taken some amazing mental gymnastics. 

You seem to be a really nice fella, so I'll try to be nice here.  

 

It is a PROVEN FACT that covid can pass right thru a mask,  similar to a train passing thru a tunnel.  Masks can stem the movement of droplets, yes... care to take a guess at how many millions or billions of virus particles are in a single droplet?


 

 

Quote

 

Medical masks

Also called surgical masks, these are loosefitting disposable masks. They're meant to protect the wearer from contact with droplets and sprays that may contain germs. A medical mask also filters out large particles in the air when the wearer breathes in.

 

Not only that, but very little actually goes THRU the mask, but travels AROUND it.   Don't believe me?  Put on a pair of glasses and breathe normally while reading a book. 

 

Your nose smells the tiny particles that are released into the air, exactly as your nose can take in the virus particles not inhibited by the mask.  

 

To see it from a different perspective, tobacco smoke ranges from 0.01-4 microns.  Does your mask prevent you from smelling cigarette smoke?  No.   Why not?  Because the mask cannot filter out particles that small.  Do you know what the filtration level of a standard surgical mask is?  Roughly 0.3 microns.  The corona virus ranges between 0.06-0.14 microns.  At the smaller end, that means that 5 covid virus particles could pass between any two threads in a mask.  So while yes, you WILL block a FEW particles with a standard surgical mask, it will be much like trying to prevent a sunburn by sitting in a screened-in porch.

 

Masks are mostly a part of virtue signaling control methods being employed.  If you are sick, and sneezing and coughing, they will slightly reduce the amount and distance your viruses can travel each time you sneeze.  If they worked as well as you seem to be claiming, no one in Korea or Japan would have gotten sick the past 50 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
7 hours ago, LIBrty4all said:

You seem to be a really nice fella, so I'll try to be nice here.  

 

It is a PROVEN FACT that covid can pass right thru a mask,  similar to a train passing thru a tunnel.  Masks can stem the movement of droplets, yes... care to take a guess at how many millions or billions of virus particles are in a single droplet?


 

 

Not only that, but very little actually goes THRU the mask, but travels AROUND it.   Don't believe me?  Put on a pair of glasses and breathe normally while reading a book. 

 

Your nose smells the tiny particles that are released into the air, exactly as your nose can take in the virus particles not inhibited by the mask.  

 

To see it from a different perspective, tobacco smoke ranges from 0.01-4 microns.  Does your mask prevent you from smelling cigarette smoke?  No.   Why not?  Because the mask cannot filter out particles that small.  Do you know what the filtration level of a standard surgical mask is?  Roughly 0.3 microns.  The corona virus ranges between 0.06-0.14 microns.  At the smaller end, that means that 5 covid virus particles could pass between any two threads in a mask.  So while yes, you WILL block a FEW particles with a standard surgical mask, it will be much like trying to prevent a sunburn by sitting in a screened-in porch.

 

Masks are mostly a part of virtue signaling control methods being employed.  If you are sick, and sneezing and coughing, they will slightly reduce the amount and distance your viruses can travel each time you sneeze.  If they worked as well as you seem to be claiming, no one in Korea or Japan would have gotten sick the past 50 years.

You are uneducated about how the virus is transmitted, all the information above is not applicable to stopping the transmission of the virus. When you breath out the virus is attached to a larger particle and that is what is filtered.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, LIBrty4all said:

You seem to be a really nice fella, so I'll try to be nice here.  

 

It is a PROVEN FACT that covid can pass right thru a mask,  similar to a train passing thru a tunnel.  Masks can stem the movement of droplets, yes... care to take a guess at how many millions or billions of virus particles are in a single droplet?

 

You assumed my pronoun. Reported 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Country: Guyana
Timeline
3 hours ago, Crtcl Rice Theory said:

You are uneducated about how the virus is transmitted, all the information above is not applicable to stopping the transmission of the virus. When you breath out the virus is attached to a larger particle and that is what is filtered.  

 

 

Sorry, I forgot you were an expert in epidemiology.  Good thing we all put on masks and no one got sick for months, eh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...