Biden team's misguided and deadly COVID-19 vaccine strategy

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,376]

8 minutes ago, LIBrty4all said:

Thank you for agreeing with me.

 

In fact, the (over-inflated) covid deaths globally stands at 4,245,846.  We shall use this false number for our math.

 

The world population is 7,884,420, 900 and climbing swiftly.

 

If you divide those two, the result is: 0.000538510824555.  This means that 99.94615% of the population survived covid world wide.

 

In 2017, the WHO estimated that the flu killed as many as 650,000 people globally.  In 2020, the CDC shows as many as 62,000 Too early for 2020 flu deaths globally, but for 2021 the US is estimating 646.

and does not mean 99% are resistant  to it by any means. 

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,376]

7 minutes ago, LIBrty4all said:

So using a sample size of 0.05385% of the US population, they determined that 10% don't have antibodies. So 90% DO have antibodies.  Yet 99.94615% survive, with or without antibodies.  

What am I to make of this, in layman's terms?

No they determined 10% do have anti bodies . Reading is fundamental. Stop getting your news from CNN and whitehouse.gov

[LIBrty4all 3,754]

10 minutes ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

and does not mean 99% are resistant  to it by any means. 

I did not say resistant to it.  I said more than 99% survive it.  So what?  99% survive the original SARS virus, the common cold.  99% survive the flu.  

 

401 people die from strokes every single day.  That's over 145,000 EVERY YEAR in the US alone.  Are we forcing people to take experimental drugs to slow that number?  Why not???  Whatever happened to "my body, my choice"???

 

Edited August 6, 2021 by LIBrty4all

[LIBrty4all 3,754]

 

7 minutes ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

No they determined 10% do have anti bodies . Reading is fundamental. Stop getting your news from CNN and whitehouse.gov

My posts come from pure math.  I haven't had cable TV in over 20 years, and I don't watch what passes for "news" much these days.  99.34567% of the news I see comes from CEHST.  

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,376]

2 minutes ago, LIBrty4all said:

I did not say resistant to it.  I said more than 99% survive it.  So what?  99% survive the original SARS virus, the common cold.  99% survive the flu.  

 

401 people die from strokes every single day.  That's over 145,000 EVERY YEAR in the US alone.  Are we forcing people to take experimental drugs to slow that number?  Why not???  Whatever happened to "my body, my choice"???

 

You said --"
Can you show me the five, or seven, or 10 years worth of studies that led to FDA approval for the current medicine being called a vaccine for covid?  You know, the disease that humans have already shown a NATURAL 99% resistance to?

 

[LIBrty4all 3,754]

 

27 minutes ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

Less than 10% of US population has COVID-19 antibodies, data show

https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/09/less-10-us-population-has-covid-19-antibodies-data-show

 

 

 

 

11 minutes ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

No they determined 10% do have anti bodies . Reading is fundamental. Stop getting your news from CNN and whitehouse.gov

So which is it?  10% DO, or less than 10% do??

[LIBrty4all 3,754]

3 minutes ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

You said --"
Can you show me the five, or seven, or 10 years worth of studies that led to FDA approval for the current medicine being called a vaccine for covid?  You know, the disease that humans have already shown a NATURAL 99% resistance to?

 

Yes, then I corrected it right below with...

 

 

 

25 minutes ago, LIBrty4all said:

Thank you for agreeing with me.

 

In fact, the (over-inflated) covid deaths globally stands at 4,245,846.  We shall use this false number for our math.

 

The world population is 7,884,420, 900 and climbing swiftly.

 

If you divide those two, the result is: 0.000538510824555.  This means that 99.94615% of the population survived covid world wide.

 

In 2017, the WHO estimated that the flu killed as many as 650,000 people globally.  In 2020, the CDC shows as many as 62,000 Too early for 2020 flu deaths globally, but for 2021 the US is estimating 646.

 

 

I was using NB wording to prove a point.

 

let me state it very clearly so that there is no confusion:

 

With or without the vaccine, more than 99% of people the world over will survive covid.

 

That is a medical FACT, and indisputable using ANY source.

[TBoneTX 45,572]

Hosing all the figures are the varied-from-the-start diagnostic issues (died of vs. with the virus, too-high PCR cycles, etc.), the reality that recurrent viral cases in the same patient have been counted as new cases, and much more.

 

And, gee man -- a thread with (so far) 2 pp. of robust debate with no upvotes for He Who Posted It?  Hmmmph, man.

[TBoneTX 45,572]

The one thing that has mystified me most from the start:  early treatment has not been pushed by the Voices with Power.  Patients who actually or presumably contract the virus are essentially told, "Go home and wait, and if you have trouble breathing later, rush yourself to the emergency department."

 

The available early treatments (HCQ + azithromicin + zinc + vitamin D), ivermectin, et al. have been actively suppressed, even with empirical and investigated proof of efficacy.

 

I attribute most of this to the reflexive attitude, "Trump mentioned these, so we must automatically dismiss them," and the rest to what others have said:  no money can be made off HCQ, ivermectin, and other medicines that are essentially in the public domain.

 

Regardless of the reason, I consider it tantamount to widespread medical malpractice, and perhaps even criminal to some standpoint, to have NOT pursued and prescribed promising early therapies, whether the above or others.  The maxim "an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure" has been ignored.

 

Furthermore, the adverse side effects from these investigational vaccines are FAR more numerous and severe than those that caused the H1N1 vaccines to be abandoned during their development phase in 2009.

 

I firmly agree that every statement and action by public and governmental figures threatens to, or actually does, violate the Nuremburg Code, and there's NO excuse for that.

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,376]

17 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

The one thing that has mystified me most from the start:  early treatment has not been pushed by the Voices with Power.  Patients who actually or presumably contract the virus are essentially told, "Go home and wait, and if you have trouble breathing later, rush yourself to the emergency department."

 

The available early treatments (HCQ + azithromicin + zinc + vitamin D), ivermectin, et al. have been actively suppressed, even with empirical and investigated proof of efficacy.

 

I attribute most of this to the reflexive attitude, "Trump mentioned these, so we must automatically dismiss them," and the rest to what others have said:  no money can be made off HCQ, ivermectin, and other medicines that are essentially in the public domain.

 

Regardless of the reason, I consider it tantamount to widespread medical malpractice, and perhaps even criminal to some standpoint, to have NOT pursued and prescribed promising early therapies, whether the above or others.  The maxim "an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure" has been ignored.

 

Furthermore, the adverse side effects from these investigational vaccines are FAR more numerous and severe than those that caused the H1N1 vaccines to be abandoned during their development phase in 2009.

 

I firmly agree that every statement and action by public and governmental figures threatens to, or actually does, violate the Nuremburg Code, and there's NO excuse for that.

its absurd a possible breakthrough like Ivomec cant at least be considered because people hate, a man that did more to trun this country around in 4 years than any President except possibly Reagan 

[rlm1893 29]

On 8/6/2021 at 12:30 PM, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

Actually Ivermectin was created specifically for humans to treat for parasites. It is regularly used world wide, including the US. It is also used to treat Malaria and Yellow Fever in the US and around the world. Did you know that my horses take penicillin, also a drug created for humans? Obviously the dose is different, just like the dose of ivermectin would be different. Taking the paste for a 1200lb horse is kinda stupid. Kinda like taking 10 Extra strength Tylenol. (Horse dose). 

I find it funny that people on visa journey embrace Socialism

 

When someone will not take a vaccine that was tested and shown to be very effective in the war against COVID, developed by some of the most brilliant minds in the world

 

But will will rush to take a heart worm treatment for animals/Anti parasitic with no conclusive studies to prove it is effective and can be fatal if administered  incorrectly .

 

 

 

 

Ivermectin: why a potential COVID treatment isn’t recommended for use

https://theconversation.com/ivermectin-why-a-potential-covid-treatment-isnt-recommended-for-use-157904