Biden team's misguided and deadly COVID-19 vaccine strategy

[TBoneTX 45,572]

This is one of the best "policy" prescriptions that I've read yet, and it puts the knee-jerk panic of local/county/state/national politicians into some perspective.  Comments on the article?

Quote

Biden team's misguided and deadly COVID-19 vaccine strategy

By Dr. Robert Malone and Peter Navarro - - Thursday, August 5, 2021

 

The Biden administration's strategy to universally vaccinate in the middle of the pandemic is bad science and badly needs a reboot.

 

This strategy will likely prolong the most dangerous phase of the worst pandemic since 1918 and almost assuredly cause more harm than good – even as it undermines faith in the entire public health system.  [...]

 

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/aug/5/biden-teams-misguided-and-deadly-covid-19-vaccine-/  

 

[milimelo 4,505]

I agree with this article. Malone invented MRNA technology so he knows what he’s talking about. All that talk about India and they managed to bring the numbers down with ivermectin and hcq. 

[Dashinka 24,629]

2 hours ago, milimelo said:

I agree with this article. Malone invented MRNA technology so he knows what he’s talking about. All that talk about India and they managed to bring the numbers down with ivermectin and hcq. 

It is interesting, no one talks about India anymore, and no one can seem to definitively explain what went on in the UK.  It really seems there has to be more focus on therapeutics, but it is all fear mongering and vaccines.

[jg121783 3,919]

4 hours ago, milimelo said:

I agree with this article. Malone invented MRNA technology so he knows what he’s talking about. All that talk about India and they managed to bring the numbers down with ivermectin and hcq. 

Can't talk about alternative treatments because if they exist the vaccine doesn't qualify for an emergency use authorization.

[milimelo 4,505]

5 hours ago, Dashinka said:

It is interesting, no one talks about India anymore, and no one can seem to definitively explain what went on in the UK.  It really seems there has to be more focus on therapeutics, but it is all fear mongering and vaccines.

Oh totally. Mainstream media will not cover anything but experimental shots even though there are treatments out there very successful. Heck what Fauci talked about last week about pill treatment is - ivermectin- but he made sure not to come out and say it already exists with no protection for manufacturers as you can get it for pennies per pill. Why go with safe and cheap pill when they can sell you booster shot for minimum $160 a pop?  Even prevention is not pushed - adequate levels of vitamin d. 

[milimelo 4,505]

3 hours ago, jg121783 said:

Can't talk about alternative treatments because if they exist the vaccine doesn't qualify for an emergency use authorization.

I know! Yet they’re trying to get everyone to take the shot even though those treatments work and can be easily used. Did you see about some families having to sue doctors/hospitals (in the US) as they wouldn’t authorize use of ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine? 

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,376]

but I thought Biden had saved us all. Can you imagine the 15 incomitance headlines if Trump was still President 

[LIBrty4all 3,754]

NINE new billionaires have been made in the past year.  Guess who? (I'll post a CNN article so a certain few will know it's actually true, without the need to fact check it)

 

https://www.cnn.com/2021/05/21/business/covid-vaccine-billionaires/index.html 

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,376]

 

When someone will not take a vaccine that was tested and shown to be very effective in the war against COVID, developed by some of the most brilliant minds in the world

 

But will will rush to take a heart worm treatment for animals/Anti parasitic with no conclusive studies to prove it is effective and can be fatal if administered  incorrectly .

 

 

 

 

Ivermectin: why a potential COVID treatment isn’t recommended for use

https://theconversation.com/ivermectin-why-a-potential-covid-treatment-isnt-recommended-for-use-157904

[LIBrty4all 3,754]

1 minute ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

 

When someone will not take a vaccine that was tested and shown to be very effective in the war against COVID, developed by some of the most brilliant minds in the world

 

But will will rush to take a heart worm treatment for animals/Anti parasitic with no conclusive studies to prove it is effective and can be fatal if administered  incorrectly . 

ALL drugs can be fatal if administered incorrectly, not sure why you'd even say that?

As for the bold part...

Can you show me the five, or seven, or 10 years worth of studies that led to FDA approval for the current medicine being called a vaccine for covid?  You know, the disease that humans have already shown a NATURAL 99% resistance to?

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,376]

1 hour ago, LIBrty4all said:

ALL drugs can be fatal if administered incorrectly, not sure why you'd even say that?

As for the bold part...

Can you show me the five, or seven, or 10 years worth of studies that led to FDA approval for the current medicine being called a vaccine for covid?  You know, the disease that humans have already shown a NATURAL 99% resistance to?

So 99% of people have resistance huh.  If that was the case the virus would not have wiped out over 4 million people 

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,376]

1 hour ago, LIBrty4all said:

ALL drugs can be fatal if administered incorrectly, not sure why you'd even say that?

As for the bold part...

Can you show me the five, or seven, or 10 years worth of studies that led to FDA approval for the current medicine being called a vaccine for covid?  You know, the disease that humans have already shown a NATURAL 99% resistance to?

Less than 10% of US population has COVID-19 antibodies, data show

https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/09/less-10-us-population-has-covid-19-antibodies-data-show

[LIBrty4all 3,754]

1 minute ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

So 99% of people have resistance huh.  If that was the case the virus would not have wiped out over 4 million people 

Thank you for agreeing with me.

 

In fact, the (over-inflated) covid deaths globally stands at 4,245,846.  We shall use this false number for our math.

 

The world population is 7,884,420, 900 and climbing swiftly.

 

If you divide those two, the result is: 0.000538510824555.  This means that 99.94615% of the population survived covid world wide.

 

In 2017, the WHO estimated that the flu killed as many as 650,000 people globally.  In 2020, the CDC shows as many as 62,000 Too early for 2020 flu deaths globally, but for 2021 the US is estimating 646.

[Dashinka 24,629]

6 minutes ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

Less than 10% of US population has COVID-19 antibodies, data show

https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/09/less-10-us-population-has-covid-19-antibodies-data-show

Just a note, it is not all about measurable antibodies., the B-Cells and T-Cells play a huge role, and they do not show up in the current antibody test to my knowledge.  I still have no idea why people that have recovered from the Vid are not included in the immune category.  Heck, even a Dr. from John's Hopkins says natural immunity is better than the vaccine.

 

https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/lasting-immunity-found-after-recovery-covid-19 

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/dr-makary-says-natural-immunity-is-more-effective-then-vaccine-immunity/ar-AAMX3sM

Edited August 6, 2021 by Dashinka

[LIBrty4all 3,754]

8 minutes ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

Less than 10% of US population has COVID-19 antibodies, data show

https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/09/less-10-us-population-has-covid-19-antibodies-data-show

So using a sample size of 0.05385% of the US population, they determined that 10% don't have antibodies. So 90% DO have antibodies.  Yet 99.94615% survive, with or without antibodies.  

What am I to make of this, in layman's terms?

Edited August 6, 2021 by LIBrty4all