Pastor in Canada to Be Arrested Using 'Anything Necessary'

[Ban Hammer 13,476]

18 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

      It's illegal to run people over under any circumstances, so no, no comparison with police arresting someone for repeatedly violating the law despite numerous warnings.

 

  

conversely, i'm sure it's also illegal to protest in the middle of the street.

[Steeleballz 7,550]

Just now, Ban Hammer said:

conversely, i'm sure it's also illegal to protest in the middle of the street.

 

  It is, but nobody ran the preacher over with a car for breaking the law, nor would it be legal or moral to do so,  so it's difficult to see arrived at that comparison.

 

  Now if you said people getting arrested for protesting in the street, then yes, that would be a similar situation. 

[LIBrty4all 3,754]

21 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

   Some people are comparing this to the holocaust online so I do give you credit for holding back.

 

   It's illegal to run people over under any circumstances, so no, no comparison with police arresting someone for repeatedly violating the law despite numerous warnings.

 

  

That may be changing soon, perhaps this year?  

 

https://www.claremoreprogress.com/news/lawmakers-advance-bills-granting-immunity-to-drivers-who-hit-protesters/article_b09f7c78-8282-11eb-a226-03e8b03c8c0e.html

 

I think I read another state is considering something similar.

[Dashinka 24,725]

3 minutes ago, LIBrty4all said:

That may be changing soon, perhaps this year?  

 

https://www.claremoreprogress.com/news/lawmakers-advance-bills-granting-immunity-to-drivers-who-hit-protesters/article_b09f7c78-8282-11eb-a226-03e8b03c8c0e.html

 

I think I read another state is considering something similar.

Loved the example the Democrat lawmaker used.    Apparently they believe if a driver finds themselves in a situation where they are in fear of their lives they should simply give up their own lives.

[Crtcl Rice Theory 2,432]

37 minutes ago, Ban Hammer said:

conversely, i'm sure it's also illegal to protest in the middle of the street.

yeah but one is a potential violent felony

[Ban Hammer 13,476]

34 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  It is, but nobody ran the preacher over with a car for breaking the law, nor would it be legal or moral to do so,  so it's difficult to see arrived at that comparison.

 

  Now if you said people getting arrested for protesting in the street, then yes, that would be a similar situation. 

in one case, the cops run amok in a house of the lord, which in the past was regarded as a place of sanctuary.

in another, people run amok in the streets - and if any cops are seen in the video, the cops are doing nothing about the protest.   and the protesters are

allowed to vandalize, harass, and sometimes assault those in the vehicles.....

[Crtcl Rice Theory 2,432]

55 minutes ago, Dashinka said:

You seem to be avoiding the question, but whatever.  Government needs followers.

And you seem to be avoiding any publication with a rational take on the actual circumstances surrounding the events but more than willing to push Townhall's view from the states on how Canada should operate. 

[Dashinka 24,725]

6 minutes ago, CanAm1980 said:

And you seem to be avoiding any publication with a rational take on the actual circumstances surrounding the events but more than willing to push Townhall's view from the states on how Canada should operate. 

So you are criticizing a source, I thought that was not allowed anymore.  Regardless, the sources you quoted really didn't say anything we didn't already know.  This entire thing was a protest, that was quite obvious, and we will see how it plays out in court when the government lawyers decide they have enough "science".  I fully expect these folks to be found guilty and be subjected to the maximum penalty.  It is Canada afterall.

[Crtcl Rice Theory 2,432]

5 minutes ago, Dashinka said:

So you are criticizing a source, I thought that was not allowed anymore.  Regardless, the sources you quoted really didn't say anything we didn't already know.  This entire thing was a protest, that was quite obvious, and we will see how it plays out in court when the government lawyers decide they have enough "science".  I fully expect these folks to be found guilty and be subjected to the maximum penalty.  It is Canada afterall.

When did criticizing sources not become allowed?  

[Steeleballz 7,550]

23 minutes ago, Ban Hammer said:

in one case, the cops run amok in a house of the lord, which in the past was regarded as a place of sanctuary.

in another, people run amok in the streets - and if any cops are seen in the video, the cops are doing nothing about the protest.   and the protesters are

allowed to vandalize, harass, and sometimes assault those in the vehicles.....

 ....then your comparison still fails?

[Dashinka 24,725]

4 minutes ago, CanAm1980 said:

When did criticizing sources not become allowed?  

 

[TBoneTX 45,888]

1 hour ago, Dashinka said:

when the government lawyers decide they have enough "science". 

I would personally like to hear precisely how many lives have been saved by the social distancing/no-church policy, presented by time period.  Of note, "All of them!" is insufficiently specific.

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,378]

4 hours ago, Dashinka said:

So you are criticizing a source, I thought that was not allowed anymore.  Regardless, the sources you quoted really didn't say anything we didn't already know.  This entire thing was a protest, that was quite obvious, and we will see how it plays out in court when the government lawyers decide they have enough "science".  I fully expect these folks to be found guilty and be subjected to the maximum penalty.  It is Canada afterall.

Before my very great, wonderful in fact letter response system was banned that would have been B.

[TBoneTX 45,888]

Referring to letter system that no one remembers the details of!  Reported!!!

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,378]

13 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

Referring to letter system that no one remembers the details of!  Reported!!!

Well it was back in the day when the CABBA sisterhood agenda reported everything they could and certain mods went along with it. Don't be coy with my hero you know you remember it LOL

 

Here it is just as a historical reference in all its grandness 

 

Liberal excuses

 

A. Bush's fault . can also be "conjure up any conservative in history that even remotely did anything similar to what is going on today. It makes it ok.

 

 

B. It was not on MSNBC or the Bill Maher show , so it never happened

 

 

C.

C. I have no idea idea how to respond to the overwhelming facts you presented, so I will just deflect the issue and move on. This covers the Tin foil hat nonsense , the Face Palm, The double Face Palm and of course the

 

D. You are Racist .

 

E-You can't comprehend what I am saying, or as they say around here between every statement.. "Know what I saying".