Pastor in Canada to Be Arrested Using 'Anything Necessary'

[Ban Hammer 13,973]

  On 5/10/2021 at 4:38 PM, Steeleballz said:

 

      It's illegal to run people over under any circumstances, so no, no comparison with police arresting someone for repeatedly violating the law despite numerous warnings.

 

  

Expand  

conversely, i'm sure it's also illegal to protest in the middle of the street.

[Steeleballz 7,550]

  On 5/10/2021 at 4:57 PM, Ban Hammer said:

conversely, i'm sure it's also illegal to protest in the middle of the street.

Expand  

 

  It is, but nobody ran the preacher over with a car for breaking the law, nor would it be legal or moral to do so,  so it's difficult to see arrived at that comparison.

 

  Now if you said people getting arrested for protesting in the street, then yes, that would be a similar situation. 

[LIBrty4all 3,754]

  On 5/10/2021 at 4:38 PM, Steeleballz said:

 

   Some people are comparing this to the holocaust online so I do give you credit for holding back.

 

   It's illegal to run people over under any circumstances, so no, no comparison with police arresting someone for repeatedly violating the law despite numerous warnings.

 

  

Expand  

That may be changing soon, perhaps this year?  

 

https://www.claremoreprogress.com/news/lawmakers-advance-bills-granting-immunity-to-drivers-who-hit-protesters/article_b09f7c78-8282-11eb-a226-03e8b03c8c0e.html

 

I think I read another state is considering something similar.

[Dashinka 25,357]

  On 5/10/2021 at 5:05 PM, LIBrty4all said:

That may be changing soon, perhaps this year?  

 

https://www.claremoreprogress.com/news/lawmakers-advance-bills-granting-immunity-to-drivers-who-hit-protesters/article_b09f7c78-8282-11eb-a226-03e8b03c8c0e.html

 

I think I read another state is considering something similar.

Expand  

Loved the example the Democrat lawmaker used.    Apparently they believe if a driver finds themselves in a situation where they are in fear of their lives they should simply give up their own lives.

[Crtcl Rice Theory 2,432]

  On 5/10/2021 at 4:57 PM, Ban Hammer said:

conversely, i'm sure it's also illegal to protest in the middle of the street.

Expand  

yeah but one is a potential violent felony

[Ban Hammer 13,973]

  On 5/10/2021 at 5:00 PM, Steeleballz said:

 

  It is, but nobody ran the preacher over with a car for breaking the law, nor would it be legal or moral to do so,  so it's difficult to see arrived at that comparison.

 

  Now if you said people getting arrested for protesting in the street, then yes, that would be a similar situation. 

Expand  

in one case, the cops run amok in a house of the lord, which in the past was regarded as a place of sanctuary.

in another, people run amok in the streets - and if any cops are seen in the video, the cops are doing nothing about the protest.   and the protesters are

allowed to vandalize, harass, and sometimes assault those in the vehicles.....

[Crtcl Rice Theory 2,432]

  On 5/10/2021 at 4:40 PM, Dashinka said:

You seem to be avoiding the question, but whatever.  Government needs followers.

Expand  

And you seem to be avoiding any publication with a rational take on the actual circumstances surrounding the events but more than willing to push Townhall's view from the states on how Canada should operate. 

[Dashinka 25,357]

  On 5/10/2021 at 5:39 PM, CanAm1980 said:

And you seem to be avoiding any publication with a rational take on the actual circumstances surrounding the events but more than willing to push Townhall's view from the states on how Canada should operate. 

Expand  

So you are criticizing a source, I thought that was not allowed anymore.  Regardless, the sources you quoted really didn't say anything we didn't already know.  This entire thing was a protest, that was quite obvious, and we will see how it plays out in court when the government lawyers decide they have enough "science".  I fully expect these folks to be found guilty and be subjected to the maximum penalty.  It is Canada afterall.

[Crtcl Rice Theory 2,432]

  On 5/10/2021 at 5:54 PM, Dashinka said:

So you are criticizing a source, I thought that was not allowed anymore.  Regardless, the sources you quoted really didn't say anything we didn't already know.  This entire thing was a protest, that was quite obvious, and we will see how it plays out in court when the government lawyers decide they have enough "science".  I fully expect these folks to be found guilty and be subjected to the maximum penalty.  It is Canada afterall.

Expand  

When did criticizing sources not become allowed?  

[Steeleballz 7,550]

  On 5/10/2021 at 5:37 PM, Ban Hammer said:

in one case, the cops run amok in a house of the lord, which in the past was regarded as a place of sanctuary.

in another, people run amok in the streets - and if any cops are seen in the video, the cops are doing nothing about the protest.   and the protesters are

allowed to vandalize, harass, and sometimes assault those in the vehicles.....

Expand  

 ....then your comparison still fails?

[Dashinka 25,357]

  On 5/10/2021 at 5:59 PM, CanAm1980 said:

When did criticizing sources not become allowed?  

Expand  

 

[TBoneTX 46,839]

  On 5/10/2021 at 5:54 PM, Dashinka said:

when the government lawyers decide they have enough "science". 

Expand  

I would personally like to hear precisely how many lives have been saved by the social distancing/no-church policy, presented by time period.  Of note, "All of them!" is insufficiently specific.

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,397]

  On 5/10/2021 at 5:54 PM, Dashinka said:

So you are criticizing a source, I thought that was not allowed anymore.  Regardless, the sources you quoted really didn't say anything we didn't already know.  This entire thing was a protest, that was quite obvious, and we will see how it plays out in court when the government lawyers decide they have enough "science".  I fully expect these folks to be found guilty and be subjected to the maximum penalty.  It is Canada afterall.

Expand  

Before my very great, wonderful in fact letter response system was banned that would have been B.

[TBoneTX 46,839]

Referring to letter system that no one remembers the details of!  Reported!!!

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,397]

  On 5/11/2021 at 2:22 AM, TBoneTX said:

Referring to letter system that no one remembers the details of!  Reported!!!

Expand  

Well it was back in the day when the CABBA sisterhood agenda reported everything they could and certain mods went along with it. Don't be coy with my hero you know you remember it LOL

 

Here it is just as a historical reference in all its grandness 

 

Liberal excuses

 

A. Bush's fault . can also be "conjure up any conservative in history that even remotely did anything similar to what is going on today. It makes it ok.

 

 

B. It was not on MSNBC or the Bill Maher show , so it never happened

 

 

C.

C. I have no idea idea how to respond to the overwhelming facts you presented, so I will just deflect the issue and move on. This covers the Tin foil hat nonsense , the Face Palm, The double Face Palm and of course the

 

D. You are Racist .

 

E-You can't comprehend what I am saying, or as they say around here between every statement.. "Know what I saying".