Jump to content
Nature Boy 2.0

Daily update on Biden tanking america

 Share

2,965 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, PGA said:

Checks? Good lord, you are old! 😁

I don't need you to tell me that.  I've got a mirror.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
7 minutes ago, PGA said:

Checks? Good lord, you are old! 😁

And he probably meant travelers' checks!

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, PGA said:

OK...so what do YOU think? What do YOU think the standards should be? What for YOU is the age teachers should teach these issues? Today, maybe nobody, or few (mostly in college campuses) gets asked their preferred pronouns, but what about a few years from now?

 

Yes, I have met and have been friends with several transgender people (though one, the first time I met her, she looked at me like I was ham sandwich 😆) ... I've even been to several drag shows in Hawaii and Texas on occasion (though someone pinched my ### at one in Hawaii which wasn't really appreciated). Honestly, I don't think anything was wrong too much in Florida but we're watching the craziness happening all over the rest of the country and trying to nip it. 

 

Will only conservative voices be heard in developing standards if they aren't developed yet? Do you ask this same question to yourself about the more liberal states: California, Oregon, Washington? I am guessing you don't. 

 

If my child came up to me today, she is 10, and said "daddy,  I think I should've been born a boy"....what is your proposal? Should I call the surgery center and schedule an appointment? Or, should I leave it to the school to decide? 

Yes, some parents are abusers...that's terrible, but should we assume ALL parents are abusers and not give them the right to information about their child?   

   

Aaaaah again I think we are actually a lot closer than you think on quite a few of these issues, but I'm game (taking a break from watching the England v Ireland match, please do not spoil the result).

 

I don't have an opinion on what the standards should be, because I'm not qualified to have an opinion. I mean, in a sort of amorphous way I believe that it's silly to pretend that there aren't non-traditionally gendered people in the world, because there very clearly are, and have been for millennia. To pretend that somehow ignoring their narratives will protect kids doesn't make sense. I'm not talking about "let's get into the nitty-gritty of the biological, social, psychological, political, etc. background" but -- as we seem to agree -- there appears to be no space for a book that happens to have a gay person in it. Kids ask all sorts of questions, and the bill seems to say that teachers couldn't respond to extremely anodyne ones like "so sometimes there can be two mommies?" 

 

Let's be real, little kids aren't doing preferred pronouns. I'm sure we could find an instance or two out there, but the exception doesn't prove any rule. It's older kids who are asking about them, kids old enough to find words to express what's happening with them. Their feelings should be appreciated and explored with the adults in their lives -- parents, doctors, faith leaders, and yes, even teachers. We are not all the same, and the lack of uniformity doesn't mean that the norm is necessarily best and should be imposed on everyone when it comes to gender identity. Again, there are ways to do this without making it about sexual congress -- gender and sexuality are very different animals. One of the trans people I know was attracted to women before he transitioned and now that he's a man, he's still attracted to women. For me personally, being a woman has little to do with being attracted to men even though I am definitely straight. 

 

Binaries are neat and tidy, and being a human really isn't neat or tidy. We're messy and we change, we grow into ourselves and keep on growing. There is so much opportunity for schools to be spaces to explore the untidiness of the human condition that respects where kids are in terms of their intellectual and emotional development. I am not capable of saying how that would be done, because I'm not an educator. But ideally that would have been thrashed out before this bill was passed. It's rather like putting the cart before the horse.

 

I have a stepdaughter who's 8 and a half. If she came to me and said she thought she'd been born in the wrong body, I'd first get all the other parents (my husband, his ex and her fiancé) in the same room with us. We'd discuss it as a family -- what does she mean when she says that? What does being a boy or being a girl mean to her? It would be a discussion for the family, first and foremost, and I would never want her teachers involved in anything more than being an ear to listen to her concerns. And no surgeon in this country will perform gender reassignment surgery to young children. None. Zip.

 

If my child is unhappy, I want to know why and I want to know what I can do to help. It could be that she thinks she's a boy because she doesn't like "girl" things (my stepdaughter would prefer to be fighting pirates, but is happy enough wearing dresses and baking cakes). That's the basis for a discussion about why it's fine to like to do things that maybe aren't "normal" amongst her peers. Or maybe there's something more to it. But no one is talking about "let's go to the surgery center" from the beginning. That's ridiculous, and I suspect you already know that. :)

 

Please don't put words in my mouth that you assume I want only liberal voices at the table. With all due respect, you don't know me, and most people who do say that I am very open to hearing from many viewpoints, and I know the power in representation. (If that wasn't clear already!) Skewing policy to reflect only one portion of society is a weak position to play from -- ultimately, there will be legal challenges and about-faces when a new partisan faction gains control. This leads to instability and polarization, or, in states like California, stagnation in policy. We need good faith actors from across the spectrum, and we need people who are open to thinking about what the goal of legislation is besides scoring cheap political points and entrenching power. I may be a pretty liberal person, but I try not to deal in absolutes wherever I can. 

 

Okay, I am being told that if we are going to finish watching the rugby before the clocks go forward, I have to wrap it up. :lol: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

Regardless of whether I believe the above argument, I upvoted it for its depth of thinking.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline

Cheques

 

English only please

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Peru
Timeline
32 minutes ago, laylalex said:

But no one is talking about "let's go to the surgery center" from the beginning. That's ridiculous, and I suspect you already know that. :)

 

OMG....go on Twitter and follow  https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^author and see what crazy is going on..

 

36 minutes ago, laylalex said:

Please don't put words in my mouth that you assume I want only liberal voices at the table. With all due respect, you don't know me, and most people who do say that I am very open to hearing from many viewpoints, and I know the power in representation. (If that wasn't clear already!) Skewing policy to reflect only one portion of society is a weak position to play from -- ultimately, there will be legal challenges and about-faces when a new partisan faction gains control. This leads to instability and polarization, or, in states like California, stagnation in policy. We need good faith actors from across the spectrum, and we need people who are open to thinking about what the goal of legislation is besides scoring cheap political points and entrenching power. I may be a pretty liberal person, but I try not to deal in absolutes wherever I can. 

Didn't intend to "put words in your mouth" but Ted Cruz? Nancy Pelosi?  AOC? Love to hear your thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Quote

New Biden Whine: Americans Are Just Too Stupid to Understand the Great Job He's Doing

BY ROBERT SPENCER MAR 12, 2022 12:01 PM ET

 

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/robert-spencer/2022/03/12/new-biden-whine-americans-are-just-too-stupid-to-understand-the-great-job-hes-doing-n1565938  

 

Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Taiwan
Timeline

image.png.2db44cae7ca2834d21fe56fb3f48605c.png

"The US immigration process requires a great deal of knowledge, planning, time, patience, and a significant amount of money.  It is quite a journey!"

- Some old child of the 50's & 60's on his laptop 

 

Senior Master Sergeant, US Air Force- Retired (after 20+ years)- Missile Systems Maintenance & Titan 2 ICBM Launch Crew Duty (200+ Alert tours)

Registered Nurse- Retired- I practiced in the areas of Labor & Delivery, Home Health, Adolescent Psych, & Adult Psych.

IT Professional- Retired- Web Site Design, Hardware Maintenance, Compound Pharmacy Software Trainer, On-site go live support, Database Manager, App Designer.

______________________________________

In summary, it took 13 months for approval of the CR-1.  It took 44 months for approval of the I-751.  It took 4 months for approval of the N-400.   It took 172 days from N-400 application to Oath Ceremony.   It took 6 weeks for Passport, then 7 additional weeks for return of wife's Naturalization Certificate.. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline

Such strong leadership in the WH.  Are they still courting Iran even after the recent missile attack?

 

Russia-Ukraine war exposes fissures between Obama, Biden officials with oil-rich country leaders
 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/russia-ukraine-war-exposes-tfissures-obama-biden-officials-oil-rich-countries

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Taiwan
Timeline

image.png.871180f0774a7b29576761430179693f.png

"The US immigration process requires a great deal of knowledge, planning, time, patience, and a significant amount of money.  It is quite a journey!"

- Some old child of the 50's & 60's on his laptop 

 

Senior Master Sergeant, US Air Force- Retired (after 20+ years)- Missile Systems Maintenance & Titan 2 ICBM Launch Crew Duty (200+ Alert tours)

Registered Nurse- Retired- I practiced in the areas of Labor & Delivery, Home Health, Adolescent Psych, & Adult Psych.

IT Professional- Retired- Web Site Design, Hardware Maintenance, Compound Pharmacy Software Trainer, On-site go live support, Database Manager, App Designer.

______________________________________

In summary, it took 13 months for approval of the CR-1.  It took 44 months for approval of the I-751.  It took 4 months for approval of the N-400.   It took 172 days from N-400 application to Oath Ceremony.   It took 6 weeks for Passport, then 7 additional weeks for return of wife's Naturalization Certificate.. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Myanmar
Timeline

I can’t fathom why he is on his knees to these three despots when all he has to do is uncancel Keystone XL. Does Premier Jason Kenney really intimidate Biden that much?
 

What a strange world when the USA treats one of its top allies worse than it treats three dictators, one of which regularly attacks America.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...