Jump to content
Jody and Misho

Public Charge Rule Dead?

 Share

37 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

On 3/9/2021 at 12:00 PM, Lucky Cat said:

That is not what I gathered from reading the article.

https://www.uscis.gov/green-card/green-card-processes-and-procedures/public-charge/inadmissibility-on-public-charge-grounds-final-rule-litigation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Taiwan
Timeline

"The US immigration process requires a great deal of knowledge, planning, time, patience, and a significant amount of money.  It is quite a journey!"

- Some old child of the 50's & 60's on his laptop 

 

Senior Master Sergeant, US Air Force- Retired (after 20+ years)- Missile Systems Maintenance & Titan 2 ICBM Launch Crew Duty (200+ Alert tours)

Registered Nurse- Retired- I practiced in the areas of Labor & Delivery, Home Health, Adolescent Psych, & Adult Psych.

IT Professional- Retired- Web Site Design, Hardware Maintenance, Compound Pharmacy Software Trainer, On-site go live support, Database Manager, App Designer.

______________________________________

In summary, it took 13 months for approval of the CR-1.  It took 44 months for approval of the I-751.  It took 4 months for approval of the N-400.   It took 172 days from N-400 application to Oath Ceremony.   It took 6 weeks for Passport, then 7 additional weeks for return of wife's Naturalization Certificate.. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

But several states have filed to join in on the lawsuit and not let it die.

It's currently dead (because of the Northern District of Illinois court order vacating the rule) so the motion by the 11 AGs in the 9th Circuit case is a totally different appellate approach since the Northern District of Illinois is in the 7th circuit. What could result (if the AGs are successful) is a circuit split and subsequent review by SCOTUS.

 

https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/docs/press-releases/2021/motions/Public_Charge_CA9_Motion_to_Intervene_FILED.02.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, HRQX said:

It's currently dead (because of the Northern District of Illinois court order vacating the rule) so the motion by the 11 AGs in the 9th Circuit case is a totally different appellate approach since the Northern District of Illinois is in the 7th circuit. What could result (if the AGs are successful) is a circuit split and subsequent review by SCOTUS.

 

https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/docs/press-releases/2021/motions/Public_Charge_CA9_Motion_to_Intervene_FILED.02.pdf

What do you think are the chances of it being revived? I assume the process will take a long time (several months) to see the final outcome.

 

 

Edited by powerpuff

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/9/2021 at 2:53 PM, Jody and Misho said:

I am hearing that the Public Charge Rule is now 'dead' again.

Silly question but does this mean I can stop paying for the garbage Cigna Global Health Insurance plan I bought for the 944 for my husband? Once he finally has an SSN Ill surely get us a marketplace plan of course. Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On 3/16/2021 at 10:33 PM, powerpuff said:

I assume the process will take a long time (several months) to see the final outcome.

There's been further development. A few weeks ago the 9th Circuit denied the Republican AGs motions with that court: http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2021/04/08/19-17213.pdf Then, yesterday SCOTUS denied without prejudice their attempts to intervene in the Northern District of Illinois case: "We deny the application, without prejudice to the States raising these and other arguments before the District Court, whether in a motion for intervention or otherwise. After the District Court considers any such motion, the States may seek review, if necessary, in the Court of Appeals, and in a renewed application in this Court." https://www.aila.org/File/Related/19050634bl.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...