Foreign News Shows Are Now Raising Questions About Joe Biden's Cognitive Issues

[Crazy Cat 41,982]

12 minutes ago, CanAm1980 said:

So you would violate your oath to protect your country ?

Huh???  I said we had THEIR bags packed. 

Edited March 11, 2021 by Lucky Cat

[Crtcl Rice Theory 2,432]

1 hour ago, Lucky Cat said:

Huh???  I said we had THEIR bags packed. 

You indicated that you would communicate the defense posture of the United States outside your command.

[TBoneTX 45,572]

Gee... the dismissed AT article cites the NY Post, Mediaite, CNN twice, webmd twice, and senate.gov -- really unreliable.  Critics should go through other AT articles at random to see how well-referenced they are, and by which sources.

[Dashinka 24,629]

14 hours ago, CanAm1980 said:

You indicated that you would communicate the defense posture of the United States outside your command.

Yep, right before he sacrificed himself for your freedom.

[Steeleballz 7,550]

10 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

Gee... the dismissed AT article cites the NY Post, Mediaite, CNN twice, webmd twice, and senate.gov -- really unreliable.  Critics should go through other AT articles at random to see how well-referenced they are, and by which sources.

 

  They also do all the things listed in the media bias site. That is often poor/unchecked sourcing, extreme bias to highlight one side of a story that they want to portray, consistent promotion of conspiracy and propaganda and lack of transparency/fake news. Many examples of those can also be found, and the site even lists several for you. 

 

  Some people seem to like AT because it says what they want to hear. That's not a good reason for anyone to listen to news or media. It's also not a good reason for anyone else to sift between what is real and what is fake on a site with an obviously biased agenda and history of making things up too many times. 

 

  People seem to have become lost on the inherent danger of confirmation bias. It doesn't matter how many sources are referenced if the author is unable to make an attempt at objectivity.

 

   

[Neonred 3,576]

I don't need to read an AT article.  I can see it with my own eyes.

[Steeleballz 7,550]

3 hours ago, Neonred said:

I don't need to read an AT article.  I can see it with my own eyes.

 

  A lot of people saw it in Trump too. As we all heard, if it was that easy to observe from a distance, psychiatrists and neurologist wouldn't be making the big bucks they do for office consults.

[Ban Hammer 13,421]

29 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  A lot of people saw it in Trump too. As we all heard, if it was that easy to observe from a distance, psychiatrists and neurologist wouldn't be making the big bucks they do for office consults.

yet oddly enough, those same armchair shrinks and facebook medical degree doctors are mysteriously silent about sleepy joe.........
perhaps there was an agenda with trump?

Edited March 11, 2021 by Ban Hammer

[Neonred 3,576]

1 hour ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  A lot of people saw it in Trump too. As we all heard, if it was that easy to observe from a distance, psychiatrists and neurologist wouldn't be making the big bucks they do for office consults.

Surely you're not trying to tell me that you think Joe is 100% and at the top of his game.  

[Steeleballz 7,550]

11 minutes ago, Neonred said:

Surely you're not trying to tell me that you think Joe is 100% and at the top of his game.  

 

  None of us will be at the top of our game at 78 years old. I don't think Joe has taken a sudden turn for the worse in the last month or two, but I don't expect his mental acuity to improve over the next 4 years.

[Steeleballz 7,550]

1 hour ago, Ban Hammer said:

yet oddly enough, those same armchair shrinks and facebook medical degree doctors are mysteriously silent about sleepy joe.........
perhaps there was an agenda with trump?

 

  Also oddly enough, all those people who defended Trump as being fine and chastised the armchair critic's diagnosis are now suddenly able to diagnose everything syndrome in Biden.

[Neonred 3,576]

6 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  None of us will be at the top of our game at 78 years old. I don't think Joe has taken a sudden turn for the worse in the last month or two, but I don't expect his mental acuity to improve over the next 4 years.

You are right.  It hasn't been a sudden turn for the worse in the last month or two.  It was painfully obvious what was happening during the campaign.  Lucky for Joe, for the most part he was able to hide away from public sight due to the covid crisis.

[Ban Hammer 13,421]

28 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  Also oddly enough, all those people who defended Trump as being fine and chastised the armchair critic's diagnosis are now suddenly able to diagnose everything syndrome in Biden.

well the left introduced that to the playbook.
 

[yuna628 9,686]

58 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  None of us will be at the top of our game at 78 years old. I don't think Joe has taken a sudden turn for the worse in the last month or two, but I don't expect his mental acuity to improve over the next 4 years.

 Man, how did we ever survive an old man president that was showing the slow decent of their age and still managed to be considered great?