Jump to content

2 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline
Posted
Quote

 

Last October, the Boston School Committee voted to temporarily rework the admissions process for the city’s three exam high schools, substituting grades, MCAS scores, and ZIP codes for the traditional entrance exam for one year.

Under the plan, 20 percent of the seats would be allocated on the basis of grades. The remaining 80 percent would be based on a combination of grades and ZIP codes, with the neighborhoods with the highest percentage of school-age children getting the greatest number of seats.

The idea behind this change is no secret: The change grew out of a years-long push to increase the number of Black and Latino students at the three elite schools: Boston Latin School, Boston Latin Academy, and the John D. O’Bryant School of Mathematics and Science.

Now, a parents group, the Boston Parent Coalition for Academic Excellence, has filed suit, claiming that the change would discriminate against white and Asian students, by reducing their presence at those schools. Meanwhile, civil rights groups have declared their intention to intervene to oppose the suit.

This is the latest chapter in a fight that has defined Boston for decades: the battle for educational equity.

The group that’s suing — officially, on behalf of 14 Asian and white students and their families — argues that ZIP code is being used here as a transparent proxy for race and ethnicity, which is pretty much true.

But it’s also true that the opportunity offered by city’s exam schools — the jewels of a system with too few quality high schools — need to be opened up to more Boston residents.

 

https://www.bostonglobe.com/2021/03/01/metro/once-again-bostons-battles-over-equity-center-schools/

 

I thought this was interesting, I can see both sides. The real issue is that according to the article there are only 3 good High Schools in Boston.

 

I do not know if that is true but assuming it is then why?  strikes me the focus should be raising the others.

 

Suggesting there is a clear civil rights issues seems spurious at best, if that was the case then allocation should be a lottery, they just want selection skewed their way. Which I can understand.

 

 

 

 

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Public education is not a democracy and it was never intended to be.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...