Jump to content

127 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, CanAm1980 said:

You didn't, but you connected their words and actions to an increase in gun sales which, if we believe the gun lobby, is not a driver of gun violence. Gun ownership <> gun violence (as per the gun lobby). 

 

I am glad we agree on addressing the root cause, I am not sure "the person" is the root cause, unless you have some insight into how we can identify and isolate who needs to be focused on. All people are not the cause, but certain people in certain situations are.

It’s pretty simple logic. As soon as there is talk of bans, the gun buying goes through the roof. People want to get in or get one more before it’s too late. Read the gun sales statistics for the past year or so, you may be shocked. 

When a drunk gets behind the wheel, do you think that alcohol should be more regulated? Or maybe cars? Or is the person responsible? I’m the odd man out in today’s world, I believe I am responsible for my own actions and choices.

And again, the media or politicians don’t care about the dozens shot every week in Chicago. No sensationalism there. 

R.I.P Spooky 2004-2015

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, spookyturtle said:

It’s pretty simple logic. As soon as there is talk of bans, the gun buying goes through the roof. People want to get in or get one more before it’s too late. Read the gun sales statistics for the past year or so, you may be shocked. 

So? Do more guns equal more gun violence? If not, do we care? 

Quote

When a drunk gets behind the wheel, do you think that alcohol should be more regulated? Or maybe cars? Or is the person responsible? I’m the odd man out in today’s world, I believe I am responsible for my own actions and choices.

There are regulations on serving alcohol and if a bar continues to cross the risky line, laws and insurance companies will step in. If an individual is caught driving impaired, it will cost you and you may find yourself doing a breathalyzer to start your car. It's not like there are zero safeguards.

 

Quote

And again, the media or politicians don’t care about the dozens shot every week in Chicago. No sensationalism there. 

I cannot argue that individual deaths don't have the impact that mass shootings have. I am not sure why deaths due to guns in Chicago are special compared to other areas.

Edited by CanAm1980
Posted
29 minutes ago, CanAm1980 said:

So? Do more guns equal more gun violence? If not, do we care? 

There are regulations on serving alcohol and if a bar continues to cross the risky line, laws and insurance companies will step in. If an individual is caught driving impaired, it will cost you and you may find yourself doing a breathalyzer to start your car. It's not like there are zero safeguards.

 

I cannot argue that individual deaths don't have the impact that mass shootings have. I am not sure why deaths due to guns in Chicago are special compared to other areas.

There are already more guns than people in the country. Stop selling them tomorrow and gun violence will end, right? All the crazy people will disappear. 

 

There are more regulations on guns than there are on alcohol. Who needs a bar to get alcohol and drive drunk? Who needs a license to drive drunk? Who needs a license to drive period? 

 

And you can’t figure out why shootings in Chicago or any other large city don’t get much attention? Did you know that up until 5 years ago or so that Chicago residents weren’t allowed to carry a handgun? Yet there were hundreds of shooting deaths every year. I wonder how that could be? Hmmmmm.....

 

 

R.I.P Spooky 2004-2015

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted (edited)
40 minutes ago, spookyturtle said:

There are already more guns than people in the country. Stop selling them tomorrow and gun violence will end, right? All the crazy people will disappear. 

I am not trying to make the case that increases in gun sales = increases in gun violence. You said that actions by Biden and Obama increased gun sales, I don't know why we would care if those folks are mentally fit and well trained.

 

Quote

There are more regulations on guns than there are on alcohol. Who needs a bar to get alcohol and drive drunk? Who needs a license to drive drunk? Who needs a license to drive period? 

If driving drunk is outlawed, only unlicensed drunks will drive? 

 

Quote

 

And you can’t figure out why shootings in Chicago or any other large city don’t get much attention? Did you know that up until 5 years ago or so that Chicago residents weren’t allowed to carry a handgun? Yet there were hundreds of shooting deaths every year. I wonder how that could be? Hmmmmm.....

 

 

No I don't know the history of gun regulation of Chicago. Do they have more or less mass shootings?

Edited by CanAm1980
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
1 hour ago, CanAm1980 said:

Do they have more or less mass shootings?

Tally the number of daily deaths-by-shooting in Chicago, and let's ask ourselves whether those totals approach, equal, or surpass the deaths from any one mass shooting that has grabbed the news headlines.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Posted
6 hours ago, CanAm1980 said:

I am not trying to make the case that increases in gun sales = increases in gun violence. You said that actions by Biden and Obama increased gun sales, I don't know why we would care if those folks are mentally fit and well trained.

 

If driving drunk is outlawed, only unlicensed drunks will drive? 

 

No I don't know the history of gun regulation of Chicago. Do they have more or less mass shootings?

Drunk driving is already against the law. Owning an illegal gun is against the law. Some people don’t follow the law. And you don’t think the person is the problem? What’s worse, ten individuals getting killed in separate incidents daily or 10 in one event? The number killed in separate incidents is many times higher than the mass incidents. 

R.I.P Spooky 2004-2015

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted
11 hours ago, CanAm1980 said:

I just wish the gun lobby would show as much respect for the victims mass shootings as they do for their desire to empty a magazine at the range. 

 

that just doesn't sound right.

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, CanAm1980 said:

So? Do more guns equal more gun violence? If not, do we care? 

There are regulations on serving alcohol and if a bar continues to cross the risky line, laws and insurance companies will step in. If an individual is caught driving impaired, it will cost you and you may find yourself doing a breathalyzer to start your car. It's not like there are zero safeguards.

 

I cannot argue that individual deaths don't have the impact that mass shootings have. I am not sure why deaths due to guns in Chicago are special compared to other areas.

Where are the regulations for selling someone a smartphone?

Edited by Dashinka

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, spookyturtle said:

Drunk driving is already against the law. Owning an illegal gun is against the law. Some people don’t follow the law. And you don’t think the person is the problem? What’s worse, ten individuals getting killed in separate incidents daily or 10 in one event? The number killed in separate incidents is many times higher than the mass incidents. 

These killings didn't come from an illegal gun, unless there is new info

 

 

I don't think all people are the problem, even the shooters in these cases were not raised to kill, what triggers these events?

 

How you can tell these two young men, who purchased very close to the time of attack from ever other young man who chooses to purchase a gun? If we could go back in time we would not let the purchase go through, but do we know what they would look like if they walked into a gun shop?

 

You can say they,or their families,  should have taken responsibility for the situation but that doesn't bring back the dead.

 

My issue the the gun lobby is that there is zero compromise on the topic of reforming the background check, magazine sizes and a host of other issues. Isn't there room to at least let the local law enforcement review the application? Can't the default be a 7 day wait unless there is a personal protection issue?

Edited by CanAm1980
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, CanAm1980 said:

Can't the default be a 7 day wait unless there is a personal protection issue?

Why should there be a wait if the background check is clear?  I haven't purchased a gun in a few years (2014-2015, I think) , but I don't recall there being a wait...other than about 15 minutes to complete the BG check.

Edited by Lucky Cat

"The US immigration process requires a great deal of knowledge, planning, time, patience, and a significant amount of money.  It is quite a journey!"

- Some old child of the 50's & 60's on his laptop 

 

Senior Master Sergeant, US Air Force- Retired (after 20+ years)- Missile Systems Maintenance & Titan 2 ICBM Launch Crew Duty (200+ Alert tours)

Registered Nurse- Retired- I practiced in the areas of Labor & Delivery, Home Health, Adolescent Psych, & Adult Psych.

IT Professional- Retired- Web Site Design, Hardware Maintenance, Compound Pharmacy Software Trainer, On-site go live support, Database Manager, App Designer.

______________________________________

In summary, it took 13 months for approval of the CR-1.  It took 44 months for approval of the I-751.  It took 4 months for approval of the N-400.   It took 172 days from N-400 application to Oath Ceremony.   It took 6 weeks for Passport, then 7 additional weeks for return of wife's Naturalization Certificate.. 
 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted
6 minutes ago, CanAm1980 said:

My issue the the gun lobby is that there is zero compromise on the topic of reforming the background check, magazine sizes and a host of other issues. Isn't there room to at least let the local law enforcement review the application? Can't the default be a 7 day wait unless there is a personal protection issue?

that's because the gun lobby (and gun owners) are well aware of what happens when there is "reforms" "compromise" "common sense gun control" and other infringements upon their rights as citizens.

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted
2 minutes ago, Lucky Cat said:

Why should there be a wait if the background check is clear?  I haven't purchased a gun in a few years, but I don't recall there being a wait...other than about 15 minutes to complete the BG check.

Provide time for a more thorough check, possibly by local law enforcement who might have background on the applicant and to add a cooling of period if the applicant is in the wrong state of mind. Getting a first time owner into training wouldn't hurt.

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, CanAm1980 said:

and to add a cooling of period if the applicant is in the wrong state of mind.

That is an infringement on my rights...an extra burden placed on a law abiding citizen......sounds like it is making assumptions about my state of mind.

Edited by Lucky Cat

"The US immigration process requires a great deal of knowledge, planning, time, patience, and a significant amount of money.  It is quite a journey!"

- Some old child of the 50's & 60's on his laptop 

 

Senior Master Sergeant, US Air Force- Retired (after 20+ years)- Missile Systems Maintenance & Titan 2 ICBM Launch Crew Duty (200+ Alert tours)

Registered Nurse- Retired- I practiced in the areas of Labor & Delivery, Home Health, Adolescent Psych, & Adult Psych.

IT Professional- Retired- Web Site Design, Hardware Maintenance, Compound Pharmacy Software Trainer, On-site go live support, Database Manager, App Designer.

______________________________________

In summary, it took 13 months for approval of the CR-1.  It took 44 months for approval of the I-751.  It took 4 months for approval of the N-400.   It took 172 days from N-400 application to Oath Ceremony.   It took 6 weeks for Passport, then 7 additional weeks for return of wife's Naturalization Certificate.. 
 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...