The second impeachment of Donald Trump thread

[Crtcl Rice Theory 2,432]

JAN 20 WORD OF THE DAY

clown coup

A deranged, poorly-planned attempt to seize power; particularly if an election does not turn out in your favor.

Disgraced attorney Rudy Giuliani’s face became drenched in sweat and hair dye as he invented evidence of widespread voter fraud during President Trump’s clown coup

[Dashinka 24,736]

On 1/21/2021 at 10:00 PM, CanAm1980 said:

JAN 20 WORD OF THE DAY

clown coup

A deranged, poorly-planned attempt to seize power; particularly if an election does not turn out in your favor.

Disgraced attorney Rudy Giuliani’s face became drenched in sweat and hair dye as he invented evidence of widespread voter fraud during President Trump’s clown coup

Well good old Chuck Schumer called the events of the 6th an “erection”, so I guess they are all idiots in DC.

[jskibo 588]

2 hours ago, Dashinka said:

Well good old Chuck Schumer called the events of the 6th an “erection”, so I guess they are all idiots in DC.

Guess it really was an "up-Rising"

[TBoneTX 45,953]

Didn't Biden win the erection?

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

3 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

Didn't Biden win the erection?

Is that why all the blood to his brain is gone? 

[TBoneTX 45,953]

13 minutes ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

Is that why all the blood to his brain is gone? 

Or maybe the brain issue is associated with an Occasional-Cortex?

[nykolos 711]

 

On 1/21/2021 at 6:33 PM, Steeleballz said:

 

The courts very definitively let everyone know, the Trump campaign had nothing.

 

 I agree, when you separate voter signatures from the ballots, and their is no law preventing States from lowering the threshold on signature verification, the Trump campaign did have nothing. That doesn't mean there wasn't mass voter fraud.

 

 

[Steeleballz 7,550]

4 hours ago, nykolos said:

 

 I agree, when you separate voter signatures from the ballots, and their is no law preventing States from lowering the threshold on signature verification, the Trump campaign did have nothing. That doesn't mean there wasn't mass voter fraud.

 

 

 

  Sure. Same as the 2016 election. Technically you could say there is never a way to disprove fraud or outside interference, since absence of proof does not mean something didn't occur. Still at some point you need to actually have some proof that it did occur. The more the better, but you have have at least a little.

 

  The courts told the Trump team over and over, give us something,  give us anything to support your claim. We need that tiny bit of evidence. They had nothing, to the point that some of the attorneys are currently facing disbarment for misconduct. 

 

  If we wanted to sum up the reason for Trump's loss, it's simply that he was the worst person ever to hold the office and people had enough. The one time he united people and inspired people in 4 years in office was by having them come together and vote him out of office. That didn't require any fraudulent votes. Honestly if they redid the election tomorrow, it would turn out even worse for the guy. He didn't do anything in his final months in office except show how unqualified he is for the job.

[Dashinka 24,736]

12 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  Sure. Same as the 2016 election. Technically you could say there is never a way to disprove fraud or outside interference, since absence of proof does not mean something didn't occur. Still at some point you need to actually have some proof that it did occur. The more the better, but you have have at least a little.

 

  The courts told the Trump team over and over, give us something,  give us anything to support your claim. We need that tiny bit of evidence. They had nothing, to the point that some of the attorneys are currently facing disbarment for misconduct. 

 

  If we wanted to sum up the reason for Trump's loss, it's simply that he was the worst person ever to hold the office and people had enough. The one time he united people and inspired people in 4 years in office was by having them come together and vote him out of office. That didn't require any fraudulent votes. Honestly if they redid the election tomorrow, it would turn out even worse for the guy. He didn't do anything in his final months in office except show how unqualified he is for the job.

I disagree he was the worst to hold the office, there are a lot of many worse examples.  He was probably the most unrefined politician to hold the office, and people like to be lied to by ‘nice’ people I guess.

[Steeleballz 7,550]

6 minutes ago, Dashinka said:

I disagree he was the worst to hold the office, there are a lot of many worse examples.  He was probably the most unrefined politician to hold the office, and people like to be lied to by ‘nice’ people I guess.

 

    That's why I phrased it specifically. I don't think he's the worst president in terms of outcomes, but I meant as a person. Worst was not the best choice of words I guess. I probably should have said the most flawed person to hold office. 

[moxy 1,051]

7 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

    That's why I phrased it specifically. I don't think he's the worst president in terms of outcomes, but I meant as a person. Worst was not the best choice of words I guess. I probably should have said the most flawed person to hold office. 

Certainly the most seditious president to ever hold office.

[Steeleballz 7,550]

Just now, moxy said:

Certainly the most seditious president to ever hold office.

 

  Yeah in modern times certainly, and in terms of his character flaws and actions throughout his term, something that wasn't all that hard to see coming. 

[Crtcl Rice Theory 2,432]

18 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  Yeah in modern times certainly, and in terms of his character flaws and actions throughout his term, something that wasn't all that hard to see coming. 

I don't think we have ever had a president incite a riot against against congress. 

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

 

3 hours ago, CanAm1980 said:

I don't think we have ever had a president incite a riot against against congress. 

That's right, we haven't.

[Crtcl Rice Theory 2,432]

5 minutes ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

 

That's right, we haven't.

....till 2021