Trump banned from Twitter!

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

Just now, CanAm1980 said:

Oddly enough, I never get called a racist or xenophobe.

I have... I have been called "someone that is racist against brown people" just because I am telling the facts in regards to immigration law. Even though my wife and two kids are brown people. 

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

Just now, Cyberfx1024 said:

Of course but you are letting the big tech be bigger than our government. Not to mention this flies in the face of Section 230 itself. So if they are wanting to go against Section 230 then they can suffer the consequences. 

Again... I love how nobody has done anything about the groups calling for violence, genocide, rioting, or anything else because it fits their agenda. 

I really don't get what they think they're actually achieving. Parler will quickly have another host if not host themselves like Gab. Then what's the next step in the censorship master plan? 

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

Just now, yuna628 said:

For a while it seemed like some people were very enthusiastic about the right of a cake baker to not bake gay cakes. Ya know, their shop, their rules or whatever... and there was this lengthy court thingy about it.. I could have sworn it all got settled.. Now it seems like a company has to be forced to host toilet cesspools when it just doesn't fit with their ideals because someone needs a safe space and can't be bothered to build their own.

You are right...... But I have also seen it the other way around on here from people in regards to the cake fight. If I remember correctly you were against the baker. 

[Crtcl Rice Theory 2,432]

3 minutes ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

Of course but you are letting the big tech be bigger than our government. Not to mention this flies in the face of Section 230 itself. So if they are wanting to go against Section 230 then they can suffer the consequences. 

Again... I love how nobody has done anything about the groups calling for violence, genocide, rioting, or anything else because it fits their agenda. 

Section 230 is not the bill of rights though.

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

16 minutes ago, CanAm1980 said:

I am not sure how Capitol police were not ready for this situation. This journalist outlined maps and tactics being published in thedonald.win two days before the rally. 

 

 

https://www.washingtonian.com/2021/01/05/maga-geniuses-plot-takeover-of-us-capitol/

Supposedly from what I heard they didn't figure that crowd would do anything crazy. 

But they also didn't account for the agitators in the crowd either on both sides. Because have arrested a couple of BLM guys that broke into the capitol in the midst of the crowd. 

1 minute ago, CanAm1980 said:

Section 230 is not the bill of rights though.

For online platforms is kinda is.

[Crtcl Rice Theory 2,432]

11 minutes ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

So he supposedly upvoted a comment that he didn't write right?

He up voted a comment that calls out how the revolution is going to go down on the 17th and that was bridge too far for the other platforms

[Crtcl Rice Theory 2,432]

1 minute ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

Supposedly from what I heard they didn't figure that crowd would do anything crazy. 

But they also didn't account for the agitators in the crowd either on both sides. Because have arrested a couple of BLM guys that broke into the capitol in the midst of the crowd. 

For online platforms is kinda is.

Let me look again.... nope cannot see Apple , Random house, AWS mentioned in the constitution.

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

This will only increase the radicalization and not decrease it at all. So do not be surprised when some crazy stuff starts popping off from people. You can bet your bottom dollar that there will be countries fanning the flames with the hopes of bringing us down.

Which supposedly that is what the CCP did in regards to the BLM riots. DHS confiscated hundreds of thousands of dollars in counterfeit bills going to specific places like Minneapolis, not to mention hundreds of IDs in Texas

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

2 minutes ago, yuna628 said:

For a while it seemed like some people were very enthusiastic about the right of a cake baker to not bake gay cakes. Ya know, their shop, their rules or whatever... and there was this lengthy court thingy about it.. I could have sworn it all got settled.. Now it seems like a company has to be forced to host toilet cesspools when it just doesn't fit with their ideals because someone needs a safe space and can't be bothered to build their own.

They are building their own. The cake analogy makes sense if the cake owners then find out everywhere the gay couple go and convince others not to make products for them as well. 

 

Regardless, the people find their own cake, making the bakers foolishness moot. Likewise the comically childish attempts to censor others wind up failing too. Just seems like a waste of time by people who simply have issues dealing with opposing viewpoints. 

[yuna628 9,676]

1 minute ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

You are right...... But I have also seen it the other way around on here from people in regards to the cake fight. If I remember correctly you were against the baker. 

I was against it from the angle that the cake baker argued their position, but I did not necessarily disagree with the decision that was made. The reality is though, the cake baker was a real jerk to the couples and if someone treated you that rudely you'd go find another baker that would kindly take you - that's how it should work in a free market. You or I might not sue the cake baker, but we'd be really annoyed. It was certainly a very interesting legal question, and it was a good effort by both sides. Parler's current host or any platform they were on are under no obligation to keep them if they do not fit with their values. They can go elsewhere or build something themselves so that they could be 'beholden' to no one. 

 

 

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

2 minutes ago, CanAm1980 said:

He up voted a comment that calls out how the revolution is going to go down on the 17th and that was bridge too far for the other platforms

How would they know he did it and that it wasn't photoshopped?

[Crtcl Rice Theory 2,432]

3 minutes ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

Supposedly from what I heard they didn't figure that crowd would do anything crazy. 

But they also didn't account for the agitators in the crowd either on both sides. Because have arrested a couple of BLM guys that broke into the capitol in the midst of the crowd. 

The arrested a blm protestor but let people attacking Capitol police walk away....

 

3 minutes ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

For online platforms is kinda is.

 

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

1 minute ago, CanAm1980 said:

The arrested a blm protestor but let people attacking Capitol police walk away....

 

 

Which they allowed the protestors through the gates in some instances and into the capitol. 

[Crtcl Rice Theory 2,432]

1 minute ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

This will only increase the radicalization and not decrease it at all. So do not be surprised when some crazy stuff starts popping off from people. You can bet your bottom dollar that there will be countries fanning the flames with the hopes of bringing us down.

 

So just like what we have gone through with our youngest getting caught up with a radical Iman, how are we going to manage radicalization that is not Muslim

 

 

1 minute ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

Which supposedly that is what the CCP did in regards to the BLM riots. DHS confiscated hundreds of thousands of dollars in counterfeit bills going to specific places like Minneapolis, not to mention hundreds of IDs in Texas

 

[Crtcl Rice Theory 2,432]

4 minutes ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

How would they know he did it and that it wasn't photoshopped?

I don't know, but you seem to have a hard time believing what is in plain sight to me, Trump will dupe other people into all manner of trouble, and he walks away untouched.