Trump banned from Twitter!

[Crtcl Rice Theory 2,432]

I am not sure how Capitol police were not ready for this situation. This journalist outlined maps and tactics being published in thedonald.win two days before the rally. 

 

 

https://www.washingtonian.com/2021/01/05/maga-geniuses-plot-takeover-of-us-capitol/

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

So this is ok with everyone but not actual free speech right?
 

 

[Crtcl Rice Theory 2,432]

5 minutes ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

The Parlet letter? Say a username or something

The user name is visible from this post, I got mine out of an archive.

 

 

 

Quote

The thing though is that they aren't just banning "racists" but anyone else they are associating with him. They have banned many well known people just because they have worked hard to get Trump reelected like the #walkaway campaign

 

Edited January 10, 2021 by CanAm1980

[yuna628 9,676]

4 minutes ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

So censorship at it's best right? You guys are turning into the very thing you hate

Who is "you guys"?

 

4 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

   Where do the poor closet racists go next?

Oh they got plenty of options. Afterall the internet is a place of opportunity. I'd say perhaps they should pull themselves up by their bootstraps, armbands, Auschwitz sweatshirts.. ya know whatever is in the latest nazi fashion and make some sort of "safe space" where they can have their own TOS.

[Steeleballz 7,550]

Just now, Cyberfx1024 said:

The Parlet letter? Say a username or something

 

The thing though is that they aren't just banning "racists" but anyone else they are associating with him. They have banned many well known people just because they have worked hard to get Trump reelected like the #walkaway campaign

 

  Well yeah, that's what happens when you allow hate speech to propagate. It doesn't even take a lot for that type of thing to take over, but maybe if Parler had done a better job of keeping that out, they wouldn't have run afoul of everyone else's terms of service agreements. I'm not sure they were ever willing to do that.

 

   So we once again learn the lesson, free speech doesn't absolve you from the consequences of free speech.

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

1 minute ago, CanAm1980 said:

The user name is visible from this post, I got mine out if am archive.

 

 

 

 

So he supposedly upvoted a comment that he didn't write right?

[Crtcl Rice Theory 2,432]

1 minute ago, yuna628 said:

Who is "you guys"?

 

Oh they got plenty of options. Afterall the internet is a place of opportunity. I'd say perhaps they should pull themselves up by their bootstraps, armbands, Auschwitz sweatshirts.. ya know whatever is in the latest nazi fashion and make some sort of "safe space" where they can have their own TOS.

Shopify is shutting that stuff down too.

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

21 minutes ago, yuna628 said:

Paler will be going offline as of tomorrow, because the host is pulling them. 

Their host is joining the deplatform attempt? This was tried on Gab as well. How did that work out? 🙂

[yuna628 9,676]

Just now, Burnt Reynolds said:

Their host is joining the deplatform attempt? This was tried on Gab as well. How did that work out? 🙂

Yes, they are pulling hosting effective tomorrow. Don't know and don't care about Gab. If they found a new host that would keep them or created their own network, more power to them. A host is under no obligation to keep something they don't want or won't abide by the rules.

[Crtcl Rice Theory 2,432]

2 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  Well yeah, that's what happens when you allow hate speech to propagate. It doesn't even take a lot for that type of thing to take over, but maybe if Parler had done a better job of keeping that out, they wouldn't have run afoul of everyone else's terms of service agreements. I'm not sure they were ever willing to do that.

 

   So we once again learn the lesson, free speech doesn't absolve you from the consequences of free speech.

People seem to forget :

"Congress shall make no law" is not "Apple and Simon& Schuster have to publish your stuff"

 

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

Just now, Steeleballz said:

 

  Well yeah, that's what happens when you allow hate speech to propagate. It doesn't even take a lot for that type of thing to take over, but maybe if Parler had done a better job of keeping that out, they wouldn't have run afoul of everyone else's terms of service agreements. I'm not sure they were ever willing to do that.

 

   So we once again learn the lesson, free speech doesn't absolve you from the consequences of free speech.

But what exactly are you implying hate speech? Because that can mean different things to different people. The obvious course of hate speech against any race, ethnic, or religious group is obviously hate speech and shouldn't be allowed. But I have seen people lately being called violent online simply for having an opinion. Heck, Jimmy Dore got called out by AOC because supposedly his words about her on #Forcethevote somehow equates to violence. Do you know how many times I get called a racist or a xenophobe simply for spouting out the laws of immigration on reddit or fb? 

[Crtcl Rice Theory 2,432]

Just now, Cyberfx1024 said:

But what exactly are you implying hate speech? Because that can mean different things to different people. The obvious course of hate speech against any race, ethnic, or religious group is obviously hate speech and shouldn't be allowed. But I have seen people lately being called violent online simply for having an opinion. Heck, Jimmy Dore got called out by AOC because supposedly his words about her on #Forcethevote somehow equates to violence. Do you know how many times I get called a racist or a xenophobe simply for spouting out the laws of immigration on reddit or fb? 

Oddly enough, I never get called a racist or xenophobe.

[Steeleballz 7,550]

1 minute ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

But what exactly are you implying hate speech? Because that can mean different things to different people. The obvious course of hate speech against any race, ethnic, or religious group is obviously hate speech and shouldn't be allowed. But I have seen people lately being called violent online simply for having an opinion. Heck, Jimmy Dore got called out by AOC because supposedly his words about her on #Forcethevote somehow equates to violence. Do you know how many times I get called a racist or a xenophobe simply for spouting out the laws of immigration on reddit or fb? 

 

  I don't know that, but I know I've never been called racist for talking about immigration or immigration law, and I used to talk about it a lot.

 

  Might it be your delivery?

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

Just now, CanAm1980 said:

People seem to forget :

"Congress shall make no law" is not "Apple and Simon& Schuster have to publish your stuff"

 

Of course but you are letting the big tech be bigger than our government. Not to mention this flies in the face of Section 230 itself. So if they are wanting to go against Section 230 then they can suffer the consequences. 

Again... I love how nobody has done anything about the groups calling for violence, genocide, rioting, or anything else because it fits their agenda. 

[yuna628 9,676]

1 minute ago, CanAm1980 said:

People seem to forget :

"Congress shall make no law" is not "Apple and Simon& Schuster have to publish your stuff"

 

For a while it seemed like some people were very enthusiastic about the right of a cake baker to not bake gay cakes. Ya know, their shop, their rules or whatever... and there was this lengthy court thingy about it.. I could have sworn it all got settled.. Now it seems like a company has to be forced to host toilet cesspools when it just doesn't fit with their ideals because someone needs a safe space and can't be bothered to build their own.