Trump banned from Twitter!

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

8 hours ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  I'll give you credit, it's not often you can get "Trump" and "honest" in the same sentence without using a negative qualifier. Good job.

What can I say he is an ### but at least you know where he stands on most things

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

26 minutes ago, laylalex said:

As a capitalist, I am all for competition. Given that several people in CEHST have said in the past week they've never heard of Gab before, and people on here seem to be pretty into online communication (I mean, hello, we are all in a forum), Gab will have a tough hill to climb. It has an in-built audience, sure, but expanding it to all the people on Twitter who just want to complain to McDonalds about their substandard Chicken McNuggets or get fast-breaking local news (what I use it for) is going to be much harder. This is said without value judgment on whatever is on Gab -- I certainly know of it, but it kind of does not seem like a place I'd find welcoming.

 

Also, my statement about meth and memes stands.  

I am all for competition and the TOS on any site. I just wish the TOS is fair to all those no matter what. I know they were more lenient with DT because he is the President but the long drawn out explanation they used to de-platform was bs at best. I am saying this because I have seen some crazy stuff from people on the Left and nothing is done to them at all. I mean it took hours of people complaining an reporting the Lincoln Project of doxxing before they even suspended the account. 

I have heard of Gab before but never felt the need to use them, the same goes for Parler as well. I have the Parler app on the phone but never even signed up yet. But if Parler wants to hire me as a InfoSec guy then that would be great. Because supposedly they had over 500+ servers on the AWS system so that will be alot of build up for them to do in a short amount of time. What I have seen from their statement is that they knew something like this was coming so they have been investing in buying up the needed physical infrastructure to make this possible.

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

31 minutes ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

I am all for competition and the TOS on any site. I just wish the TOS is fair to all those no matter what. I know they were more lenient with DT because he is the President but the long drawn out explanation they used to de-platform was bs at best. I am saying this because I have seen some crazy stuff from people on the Left and nothing is done to them at all. I mean it took hours of people complaining an reporting the Lincoln Project of doxxing before they even suspended the account. 

I have heard of Gab before but never felt the need to use them, the same goes for Parler as well. I have the Parler app on the phone but never even signed up yet. But if Parler wants to hire me as a InfoSec guy then that would be great. Because supposedly they had over 500+ servers on the AWS system so that will be alot of build up for them to do in a short amount of time. What I have seen from their statement is that they knew something like this was coming so they have been investing in buying up the needed physical infrastructure to make this possible.

The TOS has clearly been a shield from the company's malicious curating. Which is fine from a "capitalist"/"private company" perspective, but not okay for one that has government protections from liability. Should be wiped out. No company should be able to defer liability as any public platform when they are acting no differently than publishers who don't enjoy those protections.

Edited January 11, 2021 by Burnt Reynolds

[Crtcl Rice Theory 2,432]

[laylalex 7,284]

 

 

[Crtcl Rice Theory 2,432]

5 hours ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

I am all for competition and the TOS on any site. I just wish the TOS is fair to all those no matter what. I know they were more lenient with DT because he is the President but the long drawn out explanation they used to de-platform was bs at best. I am saying this because I have seen some crazy stuff from people on the Left and nothing is done to them at all. I mean it took hours of people complaining an reporting the Lincoln Project of doxxing before they even suspended the account. 

I have heard of Gab before but never felt the need to use them, the same goes for Parler as well. I have the Parler app on the phone but never even signed up yet. But if Parler wants to hire me as a InfoSec guy then that would be great. Because supposedly they had over 500+ servers on the AWS system so that will be alot of build up for them to do in a short amount of time. What I have seen from their statement is that they knew something like this was coming so they have been investing in buying up the needed physical infrastructure to make this possible.

Parler is not a good bet. They will need to build out a data center, payment stack, security and edge, containers..on and on..one does simply roll off of AWS. Send your resume to the other place with the green frog.

 

Parler CEO Says Service Dropped By “Every Vendor” And Could End His Business

 

https://deadline.com/2021/01/parler-ceo-says-service-dropped-by-every-vendor-and-could-end-the-company-1234670607/

[nykolos 711]

8 hours ago, CanAm1980 said:

Didn't Fox News predate Twitter and Facebook?

 

Of course, I was referring to how cable news was dominated by the left before Fox News came along,  the msn created the need for a conservative network, news viewers were starving for it. And now we have Twitter and Facebook doing the same thing.

 

 

Edited January 11, 2021 by nykolos

[nykolos 711]

7 hours ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

What can I say he is an ### but at least you know where he stands on most things

Bingo!, This is what voters want to see in our elected leaders, Reagan and Trump both took very unpopular positions on a variety of issues, they did it because they believed it was the right thing to do, NOT the politically correct thing to do.

 

We'll never see that from Biden, he's been a politician all his life,  failing to act or say on what he truly believes because it won't benefit him politically, The man has ZERO integrity, just like Harris, their both fakes. It's as plain as day.

 

 

[Boiler 45,486]

4 hours ago, CanAm1980 said:

We certainly studied Orwell at School, is he not part of the US school curriculum? I remember reading 3 of his books and then there has been the tv, films.

 

 

[spookyturtle 9,465]

1 hour ago, nykolos said:

Bingo!, This is what voters want to see in our elected leaders, Reagan and Trump both took very unpopular positions on a variety of issues, they did it because they believed it was the right thing to do, NOT the politically correct thing to do.

 

We'll never see that from Biden, he's been a politician all his life,  failing to act or say on what he truly believes because it won't benefit him politically, The man has ZERO integrity, just like Harris, their both fakes. It's as plain as day.

 

 

Reagan had class. Reagan cared about America, not fueling his own ego so he could tell everyone how great he was. Trump shouldn’t be mentioned in the same sentence as Reagan. Trump is as bad or worse than those in the so called swamp. 

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

6 hours ago, CanAm1980 said:

Parler is not a good bet. They will need to build out a data center, payment stack, security and edge, containers..on and on..one does simply roll off of AWS. Send your resume to the other place with the green frog.

 

Parler CEO Says Service Dropped By “Every Vendor” And Could End His Business

 

https://deadline.com/2021/01/parler-ceo-says-service-dropped-by-every-vendor-and-could-end-the-company-1234670607/

According to his statement they knew something like this was coming and have been planning an taking steps to mitigate it. But it's kinda hard to procure and stand up hundreds of servers in the blink of an eye

[Dashinka 24,493]

Victor David Hanson says it quite well.

Crazy 2020 Is Dead! Long Live Crazier 2021!

 

In the 19th century, “progressives” sought to curb the power of monopolies and trusts on the logic that the proverbial people had only the railroads or telegraphs to travel or communicate, and should be freed from their octopus “tentacles.” The railroad argument, “Ride a horse if you don’t like us,” never washed.

Now progressives enlist social media monopolies to ensure that they alone can control, censor, and cancel incorrect communications over the publicly owned airspace. “Just email or use your cell phone, if you don’t like us” won’t wash either. Progressives are no longer the watchdogs breaking up trusts. They are the trusts breaking up watchdogs.

Soon we may see all alternative social media emasculated, those with conservative views deplatformed, and the United States becoming essentially a closed society. How can we resist China when we become China—the model of efficiency in the mind of many progressives, some of whom praise their control of the social media and their solar and wind energy authoritarianism.

 

https://amgreatness.com/2021/01/10/crazy-2020-is-dead-long-live-crazier-2021/

[Boiler 45,486]

7 minutes ago, Dashinka said:

Victor David Hanson says it quite well.

Crazy 2020 Is Dead! Long Live Crazier 2021!

 

In the 19th century, “progressives” sought to curb the power of monopolies and trusts on the logic that the proverbial people had only the railroads or telegraphs to travel or communicate, and should be freed from their octopus “tentacles.” The railroad argument, “Ride a horse if you don’t like us,” never washed.

Now progressives enlist social media monopolies to ensure that they alone can control, censor, and cancel incorrect communications over the publicly owned airspace. “Just email or use your cell phone, if you don’t like us” won’t wash either. Progressives are no longer the watchdogs breaking up trusts. They are the trusts breaking up watchdogs.

Soon we may see all alternative social media emasculated, those with conservative views deplatformed, and the United States becoming essentially a closed society. How can we resist China when we become China—the model of efficiency in the mind of many progressives, some of whom praise their control of the social media and their solar and wind energy authoritarianism.

 

https://amgreatness.com/2021/01/10/crazy-2020-is-dead-long-live-crazier-2021/

I had a beer with a friend who is a Conservative and not happy, my point was that Trump came and went and like Hillary in a few years will be effectively gone, as many say on here Irrelevant.

 

What scares me is the impact of big tech, now that is Orwellian.

[Dashinka 24,493]

2 minutes ago, Boiler said:

I had a beer with a friend who is a Conservative and not happy, my point was that Trump came and went and like Hillary in a few years will be effectively gone, as many say on here Irrelevant.

 

What scares me is the impact of big tech, now that is Orwellian.

Do you think for a minute the Dems and their media allies will not do everything they can to keep Trump in the forefront at least until 2022, and Trump will most likely cater to them based on his ego and mentality?  The entire impeachment play is as much to get members on record so they can be hammered in 2022.  The two faced messages we are getting and have gotten from the Left/Dems/MSM are much more divisive than Trump ever was, and the political divisions have been forming way before Trump, so what does Nancy and the Dems do, proceed with impeachment to further fan the flames.

[Boiler 45,486]

We have seen signs, but I am not sure how they can. Like Hillary he is bound to fade, if they wanted to do that they should not have closed off his outlets?

 

There will be those looking for pay back, the infighting will be inevitable, especially as their margins are so small, they need everybody on side and everybody will want their cut.