Jump to content

180 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted
2 hours ago, moxy said:

 If you're a conservative then the popular vote--where it's literally one person, one vote--is a core conservative value and should appeal to you.

i'd like to know what playbook you're reading that from.

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted
11 minutes ago, moxy said:

So you're saying one person one vote is NOT a core conservative value?

 

The ghost of Ronald Reagan would like a word.

that's not answering the question.

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Posted
2 minutes ago, Ban Hammer said:

that's not answering the question.

I see. I thought you were being rhetorical, but no. So let me get this straight. You want to know what literal playbook I am literally reading from, to form the conclusion that a core conservative value is the idea of one person, one vote. Just so I understand the question you are asking, you are not rhetorically asking me about a playbook, you are asking for an actual playbook, title, author, etc. Is that correct?

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted
2 hours ago, moxy said:

States run elections, not the federal government so any recounts would have to be at the state level. (if you're a "states rights" person, this is exactly what you want)

 

I guess I'm 0/2 for sussing out the problem today. But again, if recounts are your biggest concerns, then I think they would be worked out. If you're a conservative then the popular vote--where it's literally one person, one vote--is a core conservative value and should appeal to you.

Yes, like I said, the states would be relegated to simply running a Federal election.  In your scenario though, only the total number matters, they don’t matter which state they come from.

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Posted
2 minutes ago, Dashinka said:

Yes, like I said, the states would be relegated to simply running a Federal election.  In your scenario though, only the total number matters, they don’t matter which state they come from.

Exactly.

 

And the states run a federal election anyway. The presidential election is a federal election run by the states.

Posted
7 minutes ago, moxy said:

Exactly.

 

And the states run a federal election anyway. The presidential election is a federal election run by the states.

I was gonna say... 

Quote

 

Federal elections occur every two years, on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November. Every member of the House of Representatives and about one-third of the Senate is up for reelection in any given election year. A presidential election is held every fourth year.

Federal elections are administered by state and local governments, although the specifics of how elections are conducted differ between the states. The Constitution and laws of the United States grant the states wide latitude in how they administer elections.

 

https://www.whitehouse.gov/about-the-white-house/elections-voting/

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted
46 minutes ago, moxy said:

I see. I thought you were being rhetorical, but no. So let me get this straight. You want to know what literal playbook I am literally reading from, to form the conclusion that a core conservative value is the idea of one person, one vote. Just so I understand the question you are asking, you are not rhetorically asking me about a playbook, you are asking for an actual playbook, title, author, etc. Is that correct?

yes.  it sounds like required reading.

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted
33 minutes ago, moxy said:

If you’re a conservative, yes. Definitely.

i'll work my way through that one right after i finish the democrat playbook on how to steal an election.

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Posted
2 minutes ago, Ban Hammer said:

i'll work my way through that one right after i finish the democrat playbook on how to steal an election.

Like everybody else here, I’m an independent so I haven’t read it. Sounds intriguing though, maybe start a new thread with that topic.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...