Jump to content
abum

Disputing Trump, Barr says no widespread election fraud

 Share

117 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
2 minutes ago, moxy said:

Has the bar actually taken action? I hadn't heard.

 

Still, it's one thing to lie to the media, and another to bald-face lie to a federal court judge. You might get censured by the bar if you lie in public; you could be thrown in jail for lying to a judge.

No but even the bat_droppings crazy Trump legal team saw fit to clarify their relationship after she stepped over the line. Imagine Guliani being embarrassed by someones behavior.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CanAm1980 said:

No but even the bat_droppings crazy Trump legal team saw fit to clarify their relationship after she stepped over the line. Imagine Guliani being embarrassed by someones behavior.

Yeah, when you're too mental to be kicked off Rudy's team, you really need to re-evaluate your life. (or just double-down and pretend it didn't happen I guess)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CanAm1980 said:

No but even the bat_droppings crazy Trump legal team saw fit to clarify their relationship after she stepped over the line. Imagine Guliani being embarrassed by someones behavior.

He was embarrassed by his own behavior once: https://people.com/politics/rudy-giuliani-embarrassed-he-hired-james-comey/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So this is actually big news right here. So what the AZ GOP is saying is that at least 1-2% of the Biden ballots have been tampered with. Which if true could have turned the election to Trump's favor.
 

 

Edited by Cyberfx1024
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Timeline
12 minutes ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

So this is actually big news right here. So what the AZ GOP is saying is that at least 1-2% of the Biden ballots have been tampered with. Which if true could have turned the election to Trump's favor.
 

 

 

 

gee, Ducey failed to take a look at this "findings"  from the "investigation"?

 

Come on, bring the lawsuit. People are waiting for the evidence to be presented at the court, not on make believe hearing or twitter "cast". 

52 minutes ago, laylalex said:

does this warrant a pardon?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

So this is actually big news right here. So what the AZ GOP is saying is that at least 1-2% of the Biden ballots have been tampered with. Which if true could have turned the election to Trump's favor.
 

 

 

 

    We were discussing this earlier over a game of Trump blackjack. Trump blackjack is like regular blackjack except you hit on 21 and stay on 22. We were wondering who thought you could extrapolate 2 votes in Arizona to 2% of the total election result nationwide?

995507-quote-moderation-in-all-things-an

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Timeline
Just now, Steeleballz said:

 

 

    We were discussing this earlier over a game of Trump blackjack. Trump blackjack is like regular blackjack except you hit on 21 and stay on 22. We were wondering who thought you could extrapolate 2 votes in Arizona to 2% of the total election result nationwide?

 

also, it could be the reason for this call but got ignored by Ducey. LOL. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

well, i hope Rudy would take this "evidence" all the way to the Supreme Courtyard by Marriot. 

 

32SJo4q.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

So this is actually big news right here. So what the AZ GOP is saying is that at least 1-2% of the Biden ballots have been tampered with. Which if true could have turned the election to Trump's favor.
 

 

I'm going to take Kelli Ward at her word, which lemme tell ya, is a lot of credit.

 

So, taking Kelli Ward on her word, she did not say that "at least 1-2% of the Biden ballots have been tampered with" as you have said. She said that they were allowed to see a sample size of 100 replacement ballots. A replacement ballot is a ballot that has been mangled or damaged to the point that it cannot be read by the machines. Poll workers are allowed to take those damaged ballots and re-create them manually using a blank ballot, so that the machine can read them. Again, taking Ward at her word, 2 of those ballots that they audited were incorrectly reproduced. One ballot was switched from Trump to Biden, the other ballot she says "was just taken away from Trump," whatever that means.

 

So what she's referring to is 2% of the replacement ballots that they audited, not 2% of "Biden ballots" (as you said) and not 2% of all replacement ballots, and certainly not 2% of all ballots. And they weren't tampered with, as I explained. Were they done incorrectly by some malicious poll worker trying to fix an election? There is no evidence, or at least none that Ward has provided.

 

At best, you can extrapolate that 2% of the replacement ballots are incorrect. Not tampered with, not fraudulent. Incorrect. Is this a problem? Perhaps. It really depends on how many replacement ballots were created. If there were millions of replacement ballots, then yeah, it could be a problem. I suspect (always willing to be corrected with factual numbers) that the number is closer to the hundreds. If some malicious poll worker thought they could steal the vote by altering 2% of replacement ballots that number in the hundreds, or hell, even in the thousands, then that poll worker cannot math. And if there was malicious intent, I suspect very much that each replacement ballot is tracked back to the replacement worker who created them.

 

This kraken is an ex-kraken.

 

--

 

moxycorp is a subdivision of moxcorp. moxycorp: we do the research for you, because you won't

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
24 minutes ago, abum said:

 

also, it could be the reason for this call but got ignored by Ducey. LOL. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

well, i hope Rudy would take this "evidence" all the way to the Supreme Courtyard by Marriot. 

 

32SJo4q.jpg

To be fair, I got this meme out in the forum a few weeks ago.  I will be glad to split the Rep points 50/50.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
1 hour ago, moxy said:

Has the bar actually taken action? I hadn't heard.

 

Still, it's one thing to lie to the media, and another to bald-face lie to a federal court judge. You might get censured by the bar if you lie in public; you could be thrown in jail for lying to a judge.

The bar or the Barr?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got censured by a bar once, and it was for lying in public.

 

I mean, lying down in public. On top of the bar. Not my best moment. :P 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, laylalex said:

I got censured by a bar once, and it was for lying in public.

 

I mean, lying down in public. On top of the bar. Not my best moment. :P 

I bet you did.... Trying to be like Coyote Ugly?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

I bet you did.... Trying to be like Coyote Ugly?

I... didn't get that far. :lol: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline

Must Cee-Span TV

 

Her theories probably  make more sense when you are three-sheets

Edited by CanAm1980
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline

Behive lady again. This poor soul cannot get a cyber job anymore, I don't think public testimony while drinking is a good c.v. builder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...