All Things Coronavirus (Part 2)

[Dashinka 24,499]

If You've Had COVID, This Is How Long You Have Immunity, New Study Finds

 

There's not much of a bright side to contracting COVID, but people have at least clung to the hope that they'd acquire some immunity after recovering from the virus. Studies have shown that people who had COVID have maintained some level of antibody response after the infection leaves their system, though it's still not clear exactly how long those antibodies last—and how thoroughly they protect you from getting sick again. Now, a new study suggests that you may be in the clear for longer than we previously thought. According to recent research, the overwhelming majority of people who have COVID retain antibodies against the virus for at least 10 months.

 

 

The study from Labcorp, which was published on May 24 in the medical journal The Lancet, examined samples from more than 39,000 people who were previously infected with COVID. The researchers found that nearly 87 percent of them had antibodies at least 10 months after their infection. The researchers also found that people over 65 generally didn't hang on to antibodies as long as those under 65.

 

Another study published on May 24 in the journal Nature also found promising results that suggest antibodies linger for months. The study found that mild cases of COVID result in lasting antibody protection and that reinfections are likely uncommon. While the study found antibody-producing cells in people 11 months after they experienced their first symptoms, researchers believe immunity lasts even longer than that, as it has with similar coronaviruses. In the 2002 SARS outbreak, for example, those who came down with the virus were naturally immune for about two years on average.

 

https://bestlifeonline.com/covid-antibodies-news/

[LIBrty4all 3,749]

 

[Crazy Cat 41,857]

 strange statement by Potatus:

 

 

[Neonred 3,562]

9 minutes ago, Lucky Cat said:

 strange statement by Potatus:

 

 

Damn, he looks like Walter the grumpy old man (puppet)

[Dashinka 24,499]

54 minutes ago, Neonred said:

Damn, he looks like Walter the grumpy old man (puppet)

 

[TBoneTX 45,291]

I'm distracted by his lack of a mask.  He needs to call Fauci for relevant guidance.

[Boiler 45,516]

https://thebulletin.org/2021/05/the-origin-of-covid-did-people-or-nature-open-pandoras-box-at-wuhan/

 

The best article I've come across regarding the origin, well worth the somewhat long read.

[LIBrty4all 3,749]

It was said on here a year ago (and several scoffed) that the virus came from the wuhan lab, and not animals in a "wet market".  Where are those who scoffed last year?  I see them posting nothing in rebuttal today.  

[Crtcl Rice Theory 2,432]

1 hour ago, LIBrty4all said:

It was said on here a year ago (and several scoffed) that the virus came from the wuhan lab, and not animals in a "wet market".  Where are those who scoffed last year?  I see them posting nothing in rebuttal today.  

Can you bring up a few of those posts? 

 

[LIBrty4all 3,749]

22 hours ago, CanAm1980 said:

Can you bring up a few of those posts? 

 

I probably could, but since it wouldn't change your mind even if I did, I'll let you find them.

 

I also remember reading many posts saying hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin were ineffective against covid by the resident experts.  

[Dashinka 24,499]

On 5/30/2021 at 1:22 AM, CanAm1980 said:

Can you bring up a few of those posts? 

 

There is a 199 page thread you can sift through them to find that discussion.  I also remember some discussions as to this possibly being a lab escape, and those were dismissed much like the drive-by media was doing.  

[Dashinka 24,499]

On 5/30/2021 at 1:22 AM, CanAm1980 said:

Can you bring up a few of those posts? 

 

Here you go, I had some free time.  A couple of the members are now gone for good, some have not posted in sometime, but others are still fairly active.  Whether this was man-made, or some form of natural gain-of-function research gone awry, who knows.  Nicholas Wade's article is really good at going through all of it in a fairly unbiased way that shows there are some features of the Sars-Covid2 virus that are hard to explain as a natural phenomenon.  Regardless, the OP in the first thread was essentially ridiculed as a conspiracy nut.

 

 

 

 

[B_J 2,752]

Interesting discussion with Bill Maher.  They even acknowledge that the lab hypothesis was dismissed because of politics.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMGWLLDSA3c

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,370]

1 hour ago, B_J said:

Interesting discussion with Bill Maher.  They even acknowledge that the lab hypothesis was dismissed because of politics.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMGWLLDSA3c

OL Bill is a lefty for sure, but at times gets it right. 

[Dashinka 24,499]

1 hour ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

OL Bill is a lefty for sure, but at times gets it right. 

He is much more of a classical Liberal as opposed to a Neolib.