All Things Coronavirus (Part 2)

[Dashinka 24,422]

12 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

I like how this guy thinks and writes.

I think there were some saying almost the same thing quite a bit and being ridiculed for it.  I also brought up the long-term question which the venerable Fauci echoed with respect to an HIV vaccine back in 1999.  My point is this is really nothing new.

[LIBrty4all 3,749]

Quote

SHOCKING: UK Government admits COVID Vaccinated Children are 4423% more likely to die of any cause & 13,633% more likely to die of COVID-19 than Unvaccinated Children

The UK Government has quietly confirmed that the Covid-19 vaccines are killing children at an unprecedented rate. Shocking figures contained in an official

 

 

 

https://expose-news.com/2022/07/27/uk-gov-vaccinated-children-increased-mortality/

 

 

 

[LIBrty4all 3,749]

On 7/26/2022 at 11:02 AM, Dashinka said:

The scarf lady seems to agree.  Just a lot of gaslighting by our "betters".

 

COVID expert Deborah Birx says she 'knew' vaccines 'were not going to protect against infection'

 

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/coronavirus/covid-expert-deborah-birx-says-she-knew-vaccines-were-not-going-protect

Gonna re-post some comments from a forum where users aren't forced to use PC words.  Hopefully no one here will require therapy after reading this...

 

To put these comments into perspective, the people commenting here are among some of the smartest, highest-wage-earning folks in America.  Not the one-percenters, but certainly the two-percenters.  They are not some random conspiracy theorists on an extremist site.  
(De-identified of course)
 

Quote

Awesome. Just lie to the entire country about something you force injected in them.
Then admit your lie with a smile and sleep soundly.
The medical community is bananas.

Quote

No adult was force injected. One could argue that children were when their parents made children’s healthcare decisions for them. But adults, even if they were sold a bill of goods, made the decision to allow someone to inject this substance into their bodies. It was often under duress and with plenty of coercion, but people who made their own decisions were not forced.

Quote

XXXX:

It was often under duress and with plenty of coercion, but people who made their own decisions were not forced.

Which is how leftist's try to define of freedom of choice.
Only their sheeple believe them.
The rest will take up arms!

Quote

Everyone has their own personal limit as to how much they will allow another to impose his or her will on them. The last 2.5 years has been a valuable lesson on that topic. Unfortunately, many have a personal limit that does not afford self preservation. Life’s most valuable lessons are often the costliest.

Quote

Sure, choose between an unnecessary “vaccine” that you do not need or supporting your family. Yes, technically that is not force, but it sure as hell is a damn blurry line and one that I will NEVER forget.

Quote

It IS blurry. And the person/entity applying the coercion or force assumes a tremendous amount of liability if the subject is injured or dies.. But that liability whether civil, criminal or both still needs to be worked out in the courts. If the question was not a “vaccine” but rather a game of Russian roulette with a single trigger pull to keep one’s job, how many would have done that? Would more have pulled the trigger if they knew that there were 999 empty chambers and only one with a bullet? It’s an interesting analogy but one that seems applicable with not only an unnecessary but potentially harmful or fatal injection.. The plan utilized the principal of divide and conquer. And it was well executed..

Quote

The Marxist Democrat left in this country has been gaslighting and lying to the American public and not only lying but using disinformation and propaganda campaigns to deny the American people the facts and the truth about political leaders and politically controlled situations.

America is being undermined and Americans are being attacked in their own homes, at their school boards, at their places of employment. This must stop and it has to stop now! The quickest way is to vote for nationalist conservative candidates from the school board on up to the President of the United States and all representatives of our constitutional republic in between those seats

 

 

 

[Dashinka 24,422]

I see Old Joe caught The Vid again.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11065075/Biden-tests-positive-COVID-goes-White-House-isolation.html

[yuna628 9,665]

2 hours ago, Dashinka said:

I see Old Joe caught The Vid again.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11065075/Biden-tests-positive-COVID-goes-White-House-isolation.html

It's not really catching it again... he's just not cleared his previous infection. Kind of like how if you stop taking antibiotics after only a few days, it's unlikely to be useful. Paxlovid rebound which is at a higher rate than reported. The five day dosage is not enough to kill off the virus and there is some indication these strains are resistant. Ridiculous that he thought he was clear after five days and was not wearing a mask, and that is why the current CDC guide is nonsense. Ten days is an average, but many are going even longer than that.

 

A family member was not clear until after two weeks and that was not with Paxlovid, but Lagevrio (similar treatment option but more risky and less effective. but when it works.. it does work.). People feel so much better with Paxlovid, unfortunately within 48hrs without the drug, things go downhill from there.

Edited July 30, 2022 by yuna628

[Mike E 11,739]

The science keeps changing 

[TBoneTX 45,077]

Dr. Peter McCullough and his research group came up with wonderful plans, involving either hydroxychloroquine (some of which I had) or ivermectin.

 

Even more important than the medication regimen is to use a nasal bulb to rinse your sinuses with diluted povidone/iodine solution 3 or 4 times daily.

 

This is not a "self-isolate until you can't breathe, then go to the hospital" disease.

[LIBrty4all 3,749]

1 hour ago, yuna628 said:

It's not really catching it again... he's just not cleared his previous infection. Kind of like how if you stop taking antibiotics after only a few days, it's unlikely to be useful. Paxlovid rebound which is at a higher rate than reported. The five day dosage is not enough to kill off the virus and there is some indication these strains are resistant. Ridiculous that he thought he was clear after five days and was not wearing a mask, and that is why the current CDC guide is nonsense. Ten days is an average, but many are going even longer than that.

 

A family member was not clear until after two weeks and that was not with Paxlovid, but Lagevrio (similar treatment option but more risky and less effective. but when it works.. it does work.). People feel so much better with Paxlovid, unfortunately within 48hrs without the drug, things go downhill from there.

I doubt Biden even has covid.  It's just a way for his handlers to keep him out of the public eye.

 

When I got covid, I was negative for it 5 days after first symptoms (though we ALL know that the tests are highly unreliable, in either direction).  Nothing but Quercitin, Zinc, D, and Ivermectin.  

[TBoneTX 45,077]

23 minutes ago, LIBrty4all said:

I doubt Biden even has covid.  It's just a way for his handlers to keep him out of the public eye.

https://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/751660-all-things-coronavirus-part-2/page/152/?tab=comments#comment-10710579

 

[LIBrty4all 3,749]

15 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

https://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/751660-all-things-coronavirus-part-2/page/152/?tab=comments#comment-10710579

 

Your link takes me to the top of this page.  Not sure what you are saying?

[TBoneTX 45,077]

21 minutes ago, LIBrty4all said:

Your link takes me to the top of this page.

Weird; it worked OK for me.  Anyway, it was to this piece that agreed with you:

https://amgreatness.com/2022/07/27/does-biden-really-have-covid-19/

[LIBrty4all 3,749]

19 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

Weird; it worked OK for me.  Anyway, it was to this piece that agreed with you:

https://amgreatness.com/2022/07/27/does-biden-really-have-covid-19/

Ahhh, gotcha.  

[yuna628 9,665]

2 hours ago, LIBrty4all said:

I doubt Biden even has covid.  It's just a way for his handlers to keep him out of the public eye.

 

When I got covid, I was negative for it 5 days after first symptoms (though we ALL know that the tests are highly unreliable, in either direction).  Nothing but Quercitin, Zinc, D, and Ivermectin.  

With new variants come different patterns of testing and length of time of infection. Some people never test positive for a variety of reasons (most but not all of those reasons are not because of a faulty test), and some take longer to test positive with this variant. Most are positive for longer than the five days the CDC claims. 

 

I was not thrilled with my family member being given Lagevrio vs Paxlovid, but they did have an improvement of symptoms, which was better than how things were looking at the start (hospitalization was a real possibility on day 3) and since it was not Paxlovid there seemed to be no rebound. I also made sure they received most of the treatments I have to take every day now to stabilize mast cells. I have no reason to doubt that Biden has Covid, any more than I had to doubt Trump having Covid. My only concern is that his doctor was stupid enough to not expect Paxlovid rebound wouldn't happen and that there is incredible hubris to tout a recovery and go without a mask, when everyone else knows that's just not the reality on the ground. I know people that were forced to go to work while still testing positive and still quite ill. The president has the luxury of sitting put, and he could at least set an example by being sensible. Paxlovid is not the golden cure, and the more people take it for a short treatment course, the more useless it will become.

Edited July 31, 2022 by yuna628

[TBoneTX 45,077]

I truly suspect some kind of sweetheart deal between the drug-manufacturers and the official health agencies.  As we've discussed here, there's no profit in using (prescribing) medicines that are in the public domain (so to speak), like HCQ and ivermectin.

[Dashinka 24,422]

12 hours ago, yuna628 said:

It's not really catching it again... he's just not cleared his previous infection. Kind of like how if you stop taking antibiotics after only a few days, it's unlikely to be useful. Paxlovid rebound which is at a higher rate than reported. The five day dosage is not enough to kill off the virus and there is some indication these strains are resistant. Ridiculous that he thought he was clear after five days and was not wearing a mask, and that is why the current CDC guide is nonsense. Ten days is an average, but many are going even longer than that.

 

A family member was not clear until after two weeks and that was not with Paxlovid, but Lagevrio (similar treatment option but more risky and less effective. but when it works.. it does work.). People feel so much better with Paxlovid, unfortunately within 48hrs without the drug, things go downhill from there.

Yes, I have heard of this with Paxlovid.  The question is why this Administration was so quick to tell us the President was clear when there was other truth to be told.

Edited July 31, 2022 by Dashinka