All Things Coronavirus (Part 2)

[LIBrty4all 3,749]

Dr. Peter McCullough.  He's been telling the truth all thru the covid mess.  He will never get the award he so deserves.

[TBoneTX 45,288]

If I were President, I'd give him his choice of whichever health agency to head.

The drawback would be that his patients would want to kill me for taking him away from them.

 

I sent him the link to the American Thinker article and asked if he'd seen it.

He responded, "Yes, so thankful."

Edited July 24, 2022 by TBoneTX

[LIBrty4all 3,749]

Of course, this will never be admitted to by the MSM.  

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/07/must-watch-dr-peter-mccullough-discusses-new-study-shows-pfizers-covid-mrna-vaccines-can-modify-dna-human-genome-video/

[TBoneTX 45,288]

He truly is a brilliant, selfless dude.

[LIBrty4all 3,749]

Know what the difference between a conspiracy theory and the truth is?

[laylalex 7,284]

8 hours ago, LIBrty4all said:

Of course, this will never be admitted to by the MSM.  

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/07/must-watch-dr-peter-mccullough-discusses-new-study-shows-pfizers-covid-mrna-vaccines-can-modify-dna-human-genome-video/

 

You should also read what the scientists who actually wrote and published the study say about what the study represents to get greater context. This information is really easy to find, it took me about 45 seconds. This is definitely the same study, I checked.

Quote

 

What did your study conclude?

YDM: This study does not investigate whether the Pfizer vaccine alters our genome. Our publication is the first in vitro study on the conversion of mRNA vaccine into DNA, inside cells of human origin. We show that the vaccine enters liver cells as early as 6 hours after the vaccine has been administered. We saw that there was DNA converted from the vaccine's mRNA in the host cells we studied.

MR: These findings were observed in petri dishes under experimental conditions, but we do not yet know if the converted DNA is integrated into the cells' DNA in the genome - and if so, if it has any consequences.

...

What are key limitations of the study?

MR: One should consider that cell lines differ from cells in living organisms, and therefore it is important that similar investigations are also studied in humans.

It is important to bear in mind that the liver cells in this study are more genetically unstable than our own liver cells.

YDM: One of the limitations of our study is that we don’t know if what we observed in this cell line could also happen in cells of other tissue types, and this needs to be addressed in follow-up studies.

...

Based on this study, is there any reason to not get vaccinated?

MR: There is no reason for anyone to change their decision to take the vaccine based on this study.

 

https://www.lunduniversity.lu.se/article/qa-covid-19-vaccine-study-gains-attention

 

More information is better, particularly if it comes from the people who should know it better than most. It is too early to say anything definitively, but that Gateway Pundit thing makes it sound like the science has "proved" that the converted DNA is integrated into human DNA in the genome, and that that is actually detrimental to health. That's just not correct, according to the authors. It may turn out to be correct but it's just too early to tell. I could be awful and say that will never be admitted to by the Gateway Pundit but I won't.  

[LIBrty4all 3,749]

I wasn't duped into injecting experimental drugs into my body, so I have zero concerns.

ETA:  I do feel sorry for those who were forced to do so.  That is nothing short of criminal.

Edited July 25, 2022 by LIBrty4all

[LIBrty4all 3,749]

Quote

Antibodies From Vaccines Interfering Instead of Neutralizing Because of Spike Protein Changes: Dr. Risch

 

Quote

The antibodies triggered by COVID-19 vaccines are interfering with people’s immune systems as newer virus variants emerge, Dr. Harvey Risch said.

 

The two most widely-used vaccines in the United States, produced by Pfizer and Moderna, both work by sending messenger RNA into muscle cells, where they produce a piece of the spike protein from the virus that causes COVID-19. The spike protein triggers the production of antibodies, which are believed to help prevent infection by SARS-CoV-2, which causes COVID-19, and fight illness if one still gets infected.

 

But the vaccines are based on the spike protein from the original virus variant, which was displaced early in the pandemic. Since then, a series of newer strains have become dominant around the world, with the latest being BA.5.

 

https://www.theepochtimes.com/antibodies-from-vaccines-interfering-instead-of-neutralizing-because-of-spike-protein-changes-dr-risch_4609932.html

[LIBrty4all 3,749]

Will this mean future pregnancy issues for vaccinated women?

 

Quote

Thousands report changes to menstrual bleeding after COVID-19 vaccine, study shows

 

 

 

https://thehill.com/changing-america/well-being/medical-advances/3569539-thousands-report-changes-to-menstrual-bleeding-after-covid-19-vaccine-study-shows/

[yuna628 9,676]

7 hours ago, LIBrty4all said:

Will this mean future pregnancy issues for vaccinated women?

 

 

 

 

https://thehill.com/changing-america/well-being/medical-advances/3569539-thousands-report-changes-to-menstrual-bleeding-after-covid-19-vaccine-study-shows/

It will not. Did you read the study? If you're interested take a look at it. The study was run by Kate Clancy and I was one of the respondents. She was incredibly kind and thorough and the subject is a passionate one for her. Her aim is to make women confident on these issues by helping them understand why these changes happen, and how they are temporary. My results were not typical compared to the many that responded to her questions. There are many reasons why a woman's cycle has changes, may become lighter or heavier, or may even skip, or double. Women who were infected also reported these changes. Her study explains why and also points out this vaccine is not unique in causing temporary changes or none at all - because we all aren't cookie-cutters that menstruate at the same time or the same flow. You will note that in the study women who had irregularities for any reason on a normal day also responded, and because again we all aren't cookie-cutter, it is extremely hard to discover the reasons why these persons have certain triggers in their cycles because they are irregular to begin with. Irregularities does not = fertility consequences. She noted that a higher number of respondents had menstrual conditions to begin with and some of them already DO affect fertility to begin with. Vaccine research has long not taken these things into account and they should. As she notes a substantial amount of those responding had no changes to their menstruation at all. 

[Dashinka 24,494]

15 minutes ago, yuna628 said:

It will not. Did you read the study? If you're interested take a look at it. The study was run by Kate Clancy and I was one of the respondents. She was incredibly kind and thorough and the subject is a passionate one for her. Her aim is to make women confident on these issues by helping them understand why these changes happen, and how they are temporary. My results were not typical compared to the many that responded to her questions. There are many reasons why a woman's cycle has changes, may become lighter or heavier, or may even skip, or double. Women who were infected also reported these changes. Her study explains why and also points out this vaccine is not unique in causing temporary changes or none at all - because we all aren't cookie-cutters that menstruate at the same time or the same flow. You will note that in the study women who had irregularities for any reason on a normal day also responded, and because again we all aren't cookie-cutter, it is extremely hard to discover the reasons why these persons have certain triggers in their cycles because they are irregular to begin with. Irregularities does not = fertility consequences. She noted that a higher number of respondents had menstrual conditions to begin with and some of them already DO affect fertility to begin with. Vaccine research has long not taken these things into account and they should. As she notes a substantial amount of those responding had no changes to their menstruation at all. 

I thought it was just a survey and not really a study.  Regardless, I am curious how they conclude the following?  What is the actual study data on the long-term effects of these experimental jabs?

 

“This doesn’t have any long-term consequences but getting COVID disease will likely disrupt the menstrual cycle much more than the vaccine.”  

[yuna628 9,676]

27 minutes ago, Dashinka said:

I thought it was just a survey and not really a study.  Regardless, I am curious how they conclude the following?  What is the actual study data on the long-term effects of these experimental jabs?

 

“This doesn’t have any long-term consequences but getting COVID disease will likely disrupt the menstrual cycle much more than the vaccine.”  

Dr Clancy did a series of in-depth surveys and interviews that formed the basis of the study since the vaccines were introduced. She also tried to present her findings to the NIH to get a long term funded project going to further look at the connection between women's health, cycles, and vaccines, but they weren't interested. ANY vaccine can interact with a cycle and cause these temporary changes. So can any drug. So can stress, the weather, weight, dietary changes, pre-existing conditions, illness, or any random reason at all. It also can matter where in a cycle a woman is when these changes happen. Women experience it all the time. She has discussed these subjects many times. There have been other studies of women that were infected with COVID and the consequences it had on their cycles likely because of the pathways the virus infects and damages - there was also clear signs that it could cause reproductive harm during pregnancy.

 

 

[Dashinka 24,494]

11 minutes ago, yuna628 said:

Dr Clancy did a series of in-depth surveys and interviews that formed the basis of the study since the vaccines were introduced. She also tried to present her findings to the NIH to get a long term funded project going to further look at the connection between women's health, cycles, and vaccines, but they weren't interested. ANY vaccine can interact with a cycle and cause these temporary changes. So can any drug. So can stress, the weather, weight, dietary changes, pre-existing conditions, illness, or any random reason at all. It also can matter where in a cycle a woman is when these changes happen. Women experience it all the time. She has discussed these subjects many times. There have been other studies of women that were infected with COVID and the consequences it had on their cycles likely because of the pathways the virus infects and damages - there was also clear signs that it could cause reproductive harm during pregnancy.

 

 

Makes sense, but still doesn't answer the question as to how Taraneh Shirazian, who did not take part in the survey, came to the conclusion they did.  It was also interesting that this survey was conducted by anthropologists, and not OBGYNs. 

[yuna628 9,676]

17 minutes ago, Dashinka said:

Makes sense, but still doesn't answer the question as to how Taraneh Shirazian, who did not take part in the survey, came to the conclusion they did.  It was also interesting that this survey was conducted by anthropologists, and not OBGYNs. 

Dr Clancy is a biological anthropologist that specializes in reproductive health, fertility, and the endometrium. Taraneh Shirazian, that was interviewed for the article is a board certified OBGYN. Both women are qualified to speak on the subject.

Edited July 25, 2022 by yuna628

[Dashinka 24,494]

4 minutes ago, yuna628 said:

Dr Clancy is a biological anthropologist that specializes in reproductive health, fertility, and the endometrium. Taraneh Shirazian, that was interviewed for the article is a board certified OBGYN. Both women are qualified to speak on the subject.

OK, that is fine, but what data lead to Dr. Shirazian's conclusion?