All Things Coronavirus (Part 2)

[LIBrty4all 3,749]

Ahhh, the efficacy of the "vaccines" comes even more into question.  95% at two weeks post-jab.  50% (or less) three months later.  But A.30?  Pfffftttt.... go away!

 

https://www.kxan36news.com/coronavirus-a30-variant-efficiently-evades-antibodies-induced-by-pfizer-astrazeneca-vaccines-lab-study

 

 

[Ontarkie 14,222]

~~One post removed as requested by the poster~~

[LIBrty4all 3,749]

 

[laylalex 7,284]

I was invited to join a large scale (100k people) study being conducted by the NIH and Cedars-Sinai as a result of my adverse reaction to the Moderna vaccine earlier this year. The study is looking into inflammatory and immune responses to the vaccine and infections, and how these can affect our health and well-being over time.

 

I am absolutely thrilled to take part in a long-range study (5 years) and help others through my own experiences.  

[TBoneTX 45,288]

This is great, LL ma'am.  Send us links to interim published reports.

[Dashinka 24,494]

15 hours ago, laylalex said:

I was invited to join a large scale (100k people) study being conducted by the NIH and Cedars-Sinai as a result of my adverse reaction to the Moderna vaccine earlier this year. The study is looking into inflammatory and immune responses to the vaccine and infections, and how these can affect our health and well-being over time.

 

I am absolutely thrilled to take part in a long-range study (5 years) and help others through my own experiences.  

Good for you (I ran out of upvotes).  I think some of that should have been done before jabs were administered, and it only shows that these vaccines are still truly only experimental.  Now that is fine as when you got yours, or I got mine, we agreed to give informed consent and talk to our personal Drs., to essentially take part in this experiment, but now that governments are mandating the jab, taking away someone's informed consent, it is problematic.

Edited November 9, 2021 by Dashinka

[LIBrty4all 3,749]

21 minutes ago, Dashinka said:

Good for you (I ran out of upvotes).  I think some of that should have been done before jabs were administered, and it only shows that these vaccines are still truly only experimental.  Now that is fine as when you got yours, or I got mine, we agreed to give informed consent and talk to our personal Drs., to essentially take part in this experiment, but now that governments are mandating the jab, taking away someone's informed consent, it is problematic.

Such a simple concept.  Amazes me how many Americans aren't upset about this potential loss of freedom.

Edited November 9, 2021 by LIBrty4all

[TBoneTX 45,288]

The problem with running randomized clinical trials is that there isn't enough unvaxxed population to form a control group.

[LIBrty4all 3,749]

13 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

The problem with running randomized clinical trials is that there isn't enough unvaxxed population to form a control group.

68% have had one shot.  59% have received the full regimen of experimental drugs.  That means at least 40% are currently eligible to be a control group.  (Not sure how that breaks down in adults/teens/children)

[TBoneTX 45,288]

And how many of the 40% are willing and includable.

[LIBrty4all 3,749]

19 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

And how many of the 40% are willing and includable.

Cannot say.  I'd do it, if need be.  

Edited November 10, 2021 by LIBrty4all

[laylalex 7,284]

Quote

 

The judge said the governor's order impedes children with disabilities from the benefits of public schools’ programs, services and activities to which they are entitled.

The advocacy group, Disability Rights Texas, filed the federal lawsuit on behalf of several Texan families in late August against Abbott, Paxton and Texas Education Agency Commissioner Mike Morath. It states that the governor’s order and the TEA’s enforcement of it deny children with disabilities access to public education as they are at high risk of illness and death from the virus.

Kym Davis Rogers, litigation attorney with Disability Rights Texas, said in a statement that the court found that Texas is not above federal law and state officials cannot prevent school districts from providing accommodations to students who are especially vulnerable to the risks of COVID-19.

"No student should be forced to make the choice of forfeiting their education or risking their health, and now they won’t have to," Rogers said.

 

https://www.texastribune.org/2021/11/10/texas-schools-mask-mandate-ban-overturned/

[Lemonslice 4,841]

From the extreme left magazine known as "The Economist", nothing to see, no one is dying. 

 

economist.com/graphic-detail/coronavirus-excess-deaths-tracker

Edited November 11, 2021 by Lemonslice

[LIBrty4all 3,749]

4 minutes ago, Lemonslice said:

From the extreme left magazine known as "The Economist", nothing to see, no one is dying. 

 

economist.com/graphic-detail/coronavirus-excess-deaths-tracker

At least the US is balancing things with their extreme over-counting of covid deaths without the need for testing.

[TBoneTX 45,288]

1 hour ago, laylalex said:

It states that the governor’s order and the TEA’s enforcement of it deny children with disabilities access to public education as they are at high risk of illness and death from the virus.

What -- wearing a mask won't protect them?  What, then, have masks been for, all this time?